What I meant to say was that people who have not read any books that they were not forced to read. That was just poorly phrased on my part.wordsmith said:Sorry dude, I have to disagree. Now, I admit that the books aren't any Subtle Knife or Angels+Demons, but I can't see how it "forces" anyone to feel that. It's a book that is written well in some parts, not so well in others.InifniteWit said:I think it's because these girl who haven't read a book that they weren't force to ever feel like they accomplished some big feat and thing that Twilight is a pinnacle of literary mastery. Despite the fact that It's a complete rip off with size eighteen font and the fact that it's a hardback make it ridiculously expensive. And these girls and boys, thinking that they've read some huge book despite its grandma size font and ridiculous margin feel that they are now scholars who have the right to piss on everybody else.
Oh no! It's a hardback!! Guess what? They invented these things called softbacks- quite a bit cheaper, which I understand was your gripe here. The font size wasn't anything noticably larger or smaller than standard, or at least I didn't pick up on it.
And finally, the assumption that we feel that we're scholars for finishing the book? Nah, we're just better informed to talk about it, on account of not just having watched a screen for three hours. Scholars are people who are better informed and more aware of the full subject that they are talking about, so in a way you're right.
As for font size. Twilight and let's say Rainbow Six are about the same thickness, size wise. While Rainbow Six has 894 pages of novel while Twilight has 512. And the fact that Rainbow Six has substantially smaller pages only points to one thing. A ridiculously large font in Twilight.
And please note that I'm only speaking from personal experience here. In my experience Twilight fans are insufferably obnoxious about what they perceive as the best book ever, despite not have ever read anything not published before this miserable decade.