Columnist Deems Enslaved Racially Insensitive

Recommended Videos

Wandrecanada

New member
Oct 3, 2008
460
0
0
The bottom line here is that this person saw something from afar and decided to analyze it's content without actually touching or examining what it was at all. I can understand where he draws his reference from but that doesn't give him a right to criticize without validating his views.

If he had done his due diligence he'd know that Monkey is in fact a character name and not a racial slur. He's also know that the story is much older than colonial slavery and in fact stems from a culture so far removed from colonialism it makes his arguments laughable. Even referencing 'Driving Miss Daisy' is clearly drawing at straws for comparisons and realistically makes no sense whatsoever in his analogy between the two IPs. Driving Miss Daisy being about the residual cultural effects of abolition and what he describes as the culture of slave gladiators (something that has been around since the Roman Empire).

Despite the gravitas of his message he should be laughed off stage merely for his poor performance in his job. Sadly his message is what protects his work from criticism merely because said criticism could easily be misconstrued or spun as racism. It belittles everyone involved when you start invoking racism without integrity or validity.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,621
0
0
Idiot ranting about racist elements in a video game that aren't actually there, but he makes up crap anyways for the monthly quota.

..This guy is no different than the rest.
 

Catalyst6

Dapper Fellow
Apr 21, 2010
1,359
0
0
Careful, columnist. If you jerk your knee any harder then you're going to break right through your desk.
 

DTWolfwood

Better than Vash!
Oct 20, 2009
3,715
0
0
Ok i find extreme offense to this racist bastard! yes i called him racist! Y because these are the kind of ppl that perpetuate racism. They call attention to it in everything to the point of absurdity, as in this case. Continually reminding everyone that race is important and that everyone and everything needs to be race related/sensitive.

I say FUCK THAT! You are who you are not based on the color of your skin but by your actions and EVERYONE must be accountable for their own. But no, that is one thing no one ever considers PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY!

So i ask whose more racist? the one who constantly calls attention to it or someone who just a bigot? I dont really see much difference between the two.

/angry rant
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,908
0
0
awesomebillfromdawsonville said:
Decent argument, but the only thing I'd dispute is that racism is dead in the US or in the first world altogether. It's a lot more subtle, but that ugly monster is still lurking around. I work in construction and witness it every day in our very own USA. Take another first world country like Japan, of which is highly xenophobic, and you'll see that this evil beast lives on in the hearts of men and women worldwide, regardless of demographics.
I think the idea of subtle or unintentional racism is simply an effort to keep it around as a "monster in the closet" so nothing overt has to be shown to justify the existance of certain movements, positions, and attitudes. I haven't been to your construction site of course, but I'd also say that a lot of things people think are racist actually aren't. Given the way that sub-cultures break down, someone can be against someone for being part of say a black subculture and acting that part, without being against them specifically because they are black and nothing else. It's sort of like when Bill Cosby talks about the problems, and education. If your act like an ignorant moron with a chip on your shoulder, it doesn't mean someone is racist for treating you like one. When you look at how much of black America takes a "git rich or die trying" attitude and feeling that there is something wrong with working, "bowing down" and becoming educated, and other things, it's not surprising that people react to those attitudes and how they behave. Racism is an excuse used to avoid the simple issue that minority groups, like Black Americans in many cases, have a lot of growing up to do. It's not racism when someone brings the problems upon themselves due to their own behavior....

Look at say comics discussions and if someone brings up a character like say "Storm" or "The Black Panther" one of the first complaints a lot of blacks will make is that they don't "act black". That right there, and the very fact that such an attitude exists on a massive scale represents the largest part of the problem. The problem is that it comes from willful ignorance, not due to a lack of oppertunity.

I myself did mention that racism exists, but it's a tiny fringe. A few neo-nazis, or skinheads out on the fringes of society are pretty much irrelevent. They have no real power, they don't make policies. People who are revealed to have such attitudes are socially ostricized. Being viewed as a racist is such a bad thing it's used both as a political weapon even when everyone realizes it's not true, and is something that people will go to huge lengths to avoid even the slightest association with.

I mentioned the far east and middle east as exceptions. I'm not sure if Japan can even properly be considered a country, never mind a first world one other than perhaps in extremely diplomatic terms. I can't think of a word that properly defines what it is.

Understand that Japan is under constant occupation and has been since World War II. Despite the economic rivalry that has happened, Japan more or less exists at the will of the US and it has an odd mix of gratitude and resentment over this. Japan is pretty much occupied by massive amounts of US troops and acts as our primary staging area for the Far East. While we play the game of being guests, it's really not a purely consentual relationship and anyone with half a brain knows it. We won't leave if simply asked because we need that foothold into that part of the world. We allow Japan to maintain a military (the SSDF) as a token gesture given the nature of their culture, but it's vastly outgunned just by the forces we have there all the time, and every once in a while you hear some rumbling about how we might take Japan's toys away from them for misbehaving.

Despite how that might sound the "gratitude" part of it comes into it largely because if we weren't there, Japan would have been wiped out long ago. I'm not talking about by the allies during World War II, but by nations like China and Korea. Japan did not treat it's neighbors well, even long before World War II. During World War II while people talk about Nazi atrocities only a few people her in the US seem to remember things like "Unit 731" (I think I have the number right, there were several similar units, but that was the especially nasty one) as well as experiments like the ones that inspired the Korean Manga "Island" (where there were photos and such in the back, along with notes about the historical incidents that inspired the story). The US might be Japan's occupiers, but we're also it's bodyguards. If we weren't there things would probably cease to be cordial with their neighbors and I think a lot of the surrounding nations would literally tear them to pieces. Japan isn't a military world power anymore, and their SSDF isn't going to have a prayer against China (which is becoming one) and North Korea (which is another big military nation) would doubtlessly both love to pay them a visit.

As a result I can't really consider Japan an independant nation, because despite the freedom and goverment allow, they are pretty much under a very polite occupation with no sign of it ever ending. It's not a territory of the US because at the same time we don't allow them quite that level of autonomy in a lot of matters, while occasionally allowing them to give us economic headaches. It's really a messed up kind of relationship.

Japan is all kinds of xenophobic on a lot of levels, bordering on xenocidal actually, which is contrasted by their odd relationship with America and the whole love/hate vibe there. I have a hard time using them as an example to base much on, because they are simply in a unique position at the moment.
 

00slash00

New member
Dec 29, 2009
2,320
0
0
to a logical human being, i dont think these thoughts would even occur. i havent played the game yet (once i actually have money, im getting it though) but there doesnt seem to be anything racist about it. i will agree that it would be pretty fuckin bad if they had a black character named monkey who was enslaved to a white person, but thats not the case here. its a tough looking tan guy with an american accent. im a hardcore feminist and even i have to say, people like this person, who try and dissect everything and attack it if they find anything remotely politically incorrect, kill creativity. im not trying to spark another video games as art debate, but part of me cant help but wonder if this same argument would be made, if it was a movie instead of a game
 

Thundero13

New member
Mar 19, 2009
2,392
0
0
I don't see how this makes any sense, Black people were slaves once and now they aren't there have been white slaves aswell and if you're looking for racism in games then thats racism in itself.
 

fozzy360

I endorse Jurassic Park
Oct 20, 2009
688
0
0
The best course of action is to take no action. Just ignore the guy, let the story fall into obscurity, and move on. Without a doubt, this is the type of person who's incredibly ignorant and so far off base with what is, but just ignore him. Otherwise, we're gonna have to deal with the Resident Evil nonsense all over again.
 

Koganesaga

New member
Feb 11, 2010
581
0
0
I hate people like this asshole who is either just like pissing people off or is so conceited that every time someone says they don't like dark chocolate, they call their lawyer.

My point is, when it's anyone else up there, not a peep is said, but the second a black person shows up a in a video game that you have to kill they try to organize a million man march? Go to hell, and let game developers do what will make a fun game, and I can safely say if I loved Left 4 Dead 2, and I killed all zombies equally regardless of race.
 

Susan Arendt

Nerd Queen
Jan 9, 2007
7,222
0
0
Therumancer said:
The problem is that racism is pretty much dead in the US, and the Western First World for that matter.
You are very fortunate that you apparently live in an area where you can go through day to day life and believe this to be true. But I assure you, racism is alive and well in the US. Having lived the majority of my life in the suburbs of Philadelphia, and now living in Durham, NC, I see it quite frequently.
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
Celtic_Kerr said:
Life is fulll of little pricks. Monkey is hardly tan, and enslaved is hardly a game based around any kind of historical slavery. End of story
He's possibly the whitest tan man ever! But alas, I do need to play the game myself, and whilst the plot summary was alittle unsettling, after seeing the review here, I doubt any of this guys points are valid.
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
Isn't automatically associating slavery with black people incredibly racist to start with. There have been numerous groups of people of a variety of origins who have been slaves throughout history. Slavery is not an associated with any race but instead with a human practice. Of course if the main character was black the game would have pulled not because it would make the game any different but because publishers are pussies and the media would get in a tizzy killing game sales. Why can't we explore black slavery in a game? Isn't that an interesting narrative model for a game? Why are we afraid?
 

Celtic_Kerr

New member
May 21, 2010
2,166
0
0
Doug said:
Celtic_Kerr said:
Life is fulll of little pricks. Monkey is hardly tan, and enslaved is hardly a game based around any kind of historical slavery. End of story
He's possibly the whitest tan man ever! But alas, I do need to play the game myself, and whilst the plot summary was alittle unsettling, after seeing the review here, I doubt any of this guys points are valid.
Well see Monkey IS enslaved. The only problem is that the machines are called enslavers. They enslave humans (duh). Trip puts a device on monkey to make him obey her, to keep him from attacking her, but after the first five seconds, she almost dies and he tells her "You follow my orders if you want to live" and she doesn't treat him mean. She's actually nice and caring.

The collar allows them to work as a team and communicate back and forth. And she tells him that she'll set him free once he's helped her out. There is VERY VERY VERY little to do with cruel slavery in the story
 

SelectivelyEvil13

New member
Jul 28, 2010
956
0
0
I find it peculiar that he has the motivation to explore the game's incorporation of a slave and "master" relationship, yet does not even read over the part mentioning its basis on Chinese legend. The comment regarding Monkey's skin color is beyond absurd and one could argue tinged with its own racist undertones. Why can't a caucasian be tan or olive? Are all caucasians the color of milk? If a picture of a caucasian is pasted on to Microsoft word, do they just blend in and disappear? I happen to be "white" but I am by no means white like a sheet of paper. With his logic, because of my olive complexion, if I were to say, be featured in a film where I was enslaved by a white girl, that film would carry an underlying message of slavery and prejudice?

Furthermore, a simple google search on slavery could possibly enlighten him regarding its worldwide history before it was prevalent in America. Perhaps he could just top off his argument with the icing of "And by the way: F--- YOU History!"
 

Sennz0r

New member
May 25, 2008
1,353
0
0
Trip and Monkey seem to have the same skin tone to me. Even if one's been forced into servitude by the other, how is it racism if they're both of -I assume- the same race?

If the game's locations were reversed, and it would take place in a ruined Tokyo, the title then being Oddyssey to the East, and the main characters subsequently being caucasian, I'd bet you all the copies of every game ever we wouldn't be having this discussion.
 

Ryujisama

New member
Sep 3, 2010
56
0
0
Thanks for setting us black folks back another few hundred years, guy. /facepalm

Seriously, read a book or two, and you'll see the inspiration for the game's story..... God, it's stuff like this almost makes me ashamed to be black....
 

ksn0va

New member
Jun 9, 2008
463
0
0
Why can't they play the game for once! Just once! It seems whenever these news groups decide to critcise a game the only research they do is look at the back of the game's casing and read the summary of the plot.
 

Chewster

It's yer man Chewy here!
Apr 24, 2008
1,050
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
chewbacca1010 said:
I have nothing to say about the story, but I honestly have no idea why stuff like this gets posted since all the reactions from people here are exactly the same.
You mean "being offended is bad, and you are a bad person for being offended?"
Basically, yeah. I don't necessarily agree with the columnist, but these reactions are so incredibly predictable.

Its the same every time. Article about Jack Thompson? "He's an idiot who knows nothing about games!" Ebert saying "games aren't art"? "Who cares what he thinks, he looks at films and is an idiot." Like, who the fuck cares man? We're so quick to jump up and down and scream and defend games at all cost.

Paying attention to this stuff ensure it will keep happening.
 

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
So it all boils down to "it'd be offensive if he was black". If that's not reaching, I don't know what the fuck is.