Skipping work in terms of your local workplace stinks of any old excuse to dodge work unless there's a regional outbreak. Skipping major international conferences is a whole different ballgame: those have a massively higher risk of exposure not just because of the wide number of people from many countries at the conference, but also from having to go through airports which are probably even more risky (says me, having been through Heathrow twice in the last fortnight.)CaitSeith said:You don't remember because you probably weren't in Mexico; but lots of people there skipped work back then, and for a couple of weeks the public transport and the streets were eerily emptier than usual.
* * *
I find it fascinating to wonder how governments are assessing this. They know travel is vital to the economy, and shutting some or all of it down at any level is economically painful. They also know that the virus means healthcare costs, fatalities, and economic costs.
I absolutely bet you they are frantically doing calculations to assess what the various human and economic costs of different scenarios are plus the likely probabilities in order to determine their response. I'm also willing to bet you that it's the money that's guiding their actions, not the lives.