Why not, but I'm sure the jiggle physics are still in place.Gatx said:Wait wait wait, I thought Team Ninja was trying to turn DoA AWAY from that direction after Itagaki left. Isn't that why the first footage featured two guys fighting?
It's clever. Everybody is too preoccupied to notice the lacking gameplayKungfu_Teddybear said:This is just sad. Focus on the gameplay not the jiggling of the chesticles.
Well for one I believe the sex scene with Jacob Taylor in ME2 is with him shirtless (he doesn't really do it for me so I never romanced him so I don't know for certain). There's also a scene in ME 2 of a shirtless Jacob doing sit-ups.David Bjur said:.>Screamarie said:First and foremost, it was a joke to point out how wrong this situation is. If a guy read that post and felt that it was "wrong" or "stupid" to use men in that way...well guess how I feel about DoA? Don't get me wrong, I'm all for fanservice but a game SPECIFICALLY designed FOR fan service? With little to no other redeeming qualities except boobies? It wears a little on the nerves.RelexCryo said:I think the game industry as a whole should cater to women more, but, demanding each invididual franchise cater to both genders equally is a bit unreasonable. Romance Novels almost exclusively cater to women, Boy Bands are clearly designed to cater primarily to women, and so are most soap operas. And the fact that Romance Novels cater almost exclusively to women is made even worse by the fact that the vast majority of books sold in drug stores, airports, and walmarts, are romance novels- meaning it is hard to find a convenient book department in an average grocery store that sells sci-fi.
The tendency of specific franchises and even genres to cater to specific demographics- and specific genders- applies to a lot of artistic mediums. It isn't really reasonable to, for example, demand that all boy bands hire a bunch of attractive women singers to appeal to men. I do think the games industry in general should produce more for women though, and there should be more games which focus on immersion.
And romance novels are, yes, written with women in mind...but 90% of them are written by women. There's nothing to stop a man to go out and write a romance novel, yes there are societies perceptions but that would have to be the risk he would want to take to write that and hopefully change the genre...though what exactly a romance novel written for men would be like. The obvious joke is porn, but I know that most guys actually want more than that out of their relationships.
And while there are plenty of boy bands for women to swoon over and plenty of hot male singers...there's also a lot of girl bands and hot female singers for guys to fantasize over as well. So we're pretty evenly represented in the music business.
The thing about games is...there's very little fanservice for female gamers. There is absolutely nothing like DoA Xtreme Beach Volleyball for women. Yes we get a little fanservice here and there, Mass Effect comes to mind, but there has been absolutely nothing that catered specifically to women in games, no AAA title that made was specifically so women can look at hot men running around.
Now am I saying that we necessarily NEED that? No. I'm perfectly fine with getting light fanservice here and there because I don't play games to drool over guys, I play because it's fun and I like to see stories unfold. That said though, if that's all I get, and that's all the other straight female gamers get, then why should male gamers get more than we do? What makes you so much more special that you can get a game built around fan service and we can't?
I'm not seriously asking Team Ninja to make a game called DoA Men, I'm just asking for a little equality, one way or the other.
I don't want to sound like a creep, but I don't really now which parts of Mass Effect that would appeal to women, so can you please like, explain which parts there is?
Unless it's from Mass Effect 3, then I don't want to know, since I haven't played that one yet.
OT: Great, breasts. Although if I would buy the game, then I would be too obsessed with the actual gameplay to care about the jiggles anyway. Only game where sex appeal has been interesting to me was in Mass Effect 1 and 2 since they weren't really blown out of proportion which seems to happen in these fighting games.
Perhaps you are the chosen one who can answer my question.Screamarie said:The thing about games is...there's very little fanservice for female gamers. There is absolutely nothing like DoA Xtreme Beach Volleyball for women. Yes we get a little fanservice here and there, Mass Effect comes to mind, but there has been absolutely nothing that catered specifically to women in games, no AAA title that made was specifically so women can look at hot men running around.
Now am I saying that we necessarily NEED that? No. I'm perfectly fine with getting light fanservice here and there because I don't play games to drool over guys, I play because it's fun and I like to see stories unfold. That said though, if that's all I get, and that's all the other straight female gamers get, then why should male gamers get more than we do? What makes you so much more special that you can get a game built around fan service and we can't?
the term "bulge bounce" just made me sick. It's now burned into my imagination the way horses used to be branded with fiery metal!Screamarie said:Okay...Team Ninja I will not get pissed about the boobies....
IF you come out with a DOA Men with the same number of sexy male characters as there are of sexy female characters in the original DOA, clothing transparency, different costumes for each guy, and clothing specific bulge bounce, and lots of fanservice.
Then we're even.
I don't recall bringing media aimed at women up at all. I was merely pointing out that the age-old argument of "Yeah, the women are wearing chainmail bikinis and heels in epic fantasy battles, but look at the barbarian men wearing loincloths! There's fanservice for women, too!" isn't really much of an argument at all. It is about objectification, and yes I would argue that tawdry romance novels are objectifying men as games like DOA objectify women. It's just more problematic when women are the ones being objectified, as men have the institutional power on their side to lend that objectification more weight.RelexCryo said:I am going to quote what I said earlier: Boy Bands are clearly designed to appeal to women, Romance novels are clearly designed to appeal to women, and so are most soap operas. The tendency of specific franchises, and entire genres, to focus on appeasing on just one demographic, is a wide spread issue. Here is my problem with what you said John: You equated designing something for men with treating women as less than human, despite the fact that many entertainment mediums are designed for women, also with a focus on sexualizing men.John Funk said:It's less about hypersexualization and more about objectification. The super-sexy buxom girls fighting in heels is a male power fantasy. The shirtless ripping-muscle brawny dudes is... also a male powerfantasy. Guys want both; it's not female service as it is a different kind of male fanservice.ObsidianJones said:I have a question.
This is for the ladies (not men who like men, because it's a different situation with you guys).
For the vast majority of heterosexual men, the less a woman wears, the sexier he might find her to be. A lot of heterosexual men feel this way, as which when women go 'why are women hypersexualized', men go '... there are a ton of dudes with their shirts off'.
Ok. So... how would you guys design a man to make him hypersexualized? I don't think a bouncing bulge would really do it, so what will?
For female fanservice? I don't know, it depends on the lady. But rippling beefcake isn't necessarily it.
Do Boy Bands objectify men? Designing something for a specific demographic- in the case of DOA, men- is not the same as objectifying the group you are attracted to. It is not the same as treating women as mere objects.
I had a long bit written here and then I ended up losing it so let's try this again, but briefer.ObsidianJones said:Perhaps you are the chosen one who can answer my question.Screamarie said:The thing about games is...there's very little fanservice for female gamers. There is absolutely nothing like DoA Xtreme Beach Volleyball for women. Yes we get a little fanservice here and there, Mass Effect comes to mind, but there has been absolutely nothing that catered specifically to women in games, no AAA title that made was specifically so women can look at hot men running around.
Now am I saying that we necessarily NEED that? No. I'm perfectly fine with getting light fanservice here and there because I don't play games to drool over guys, I play because it's fun and I like to see stories unfold. That said though, if that's all I get, and that's all the other straight female gamers get, then why should male gamers get more than we do? What makes you so much more special that you can get a game built around fan service and we can't?
In your mind, how would you design fanservice for women? If 'hot shirtless' guys aren't it, what would be tantalizing to you?
There was a pic on Deviant Art with a Batman specifically designed to appeal to what women like. It was a comic with a female artist making Batman a specifically woman's fantasy, and it was basically Anime Batman, with larger, limpid eyes, less muscles and more sleek, and the guy she was drawing it for felt sick to his stomach just looking at it. I kick myself every day for not having faved it when I saw it, because now I can't find it.John Funk said:It's less about hypersexualization and more about objectification. The super-sexy buxom girls fighting in heels is a male power fantasy. The shirtless ripping-muscle brawny dudes is... also a male powerfantasy. Guys want both; it's not female service as it is a different kind of male fanservice.ObsidianJones said:I have a question.
This is for the ladies (not men who like men, because it's a different situation with you guys).
For the vast majority of heterosexual men, the less a woman wears, the sexier he might find her to be. A lot of heterosexual men feel this way, as which when women go 'why are women hypersexualized', men go '... there are a ton of dudes with their shirts off'.
Ok. So... how would you guys design a man to make him hypersexualized? I don't think a bouncing bulge would really do it, so what will?
For female fanservice? I don't know, it depends on the lady. But rippling beefcake isn't necessarily it.
I'M NOT GAY!Screamarie said:Well for one I believe the sex scene with Jacob Taylor in ME2 is with him shirtless (he doesn't really do it for me so I never romanced him so I don't know for certain). There's also a scene in ME 2 of a shirtless Jacob doing sit-ups.
There's the low cut on Thane's top so you get a small view of drell muscle.
There's a couple of shirtless scenes in ME3, but I won't get into that.
Hmm...I'm pretty sure there's more, but I'm only one woman who does not have a photographic memory so I'm certain to be missing some stuff.
It's certainly not as often as male fanservice, and probably not as blatant, but it's there.
Can I ask why you want to know?
I never said they don't look for physical attractiveness, just that they aren't as stupid about it as guys are. We see boobs and most of us start staring and drooling, women are usually more controlled.Vyress said:Yup of course. Because women never care about looks at all. Because Justin Bieber got famous (in the US anyway) for his awesome songs. Because 'fangirls' are always rational in their tastes not caring about looks at all. Sure.
Wrong again, the number of serious female gamers is a minority, but they still probably make up around 30% of gamers, and maybe 10% of developers. Statistically, with the hundreds of games we have focused on tits, you'd think there'd be at least one focused on dicks.The only real reason why there aren't any games solely focused on female fanservice is the number of female gamers. It has nothing to do with girls caring less about these things than boys. Like, seriously... Ever went into a club?
It's a matter of tastes, I prefer more realistic games, not ones that feature 5-but-actually-200 year-old catwomen decked out in a metal thong, in some fantasy land, blah, blah, blah. Honestly, I'm quite happy sticking with Western FPS, RTS, racing, and RPG games.Staying clear off games with boobs and hot chicks: Tera Online is actually also a really good and fun game. ^^ There is more to gaming than FPS, racing and sports games.
It's not a moral card, I'm not saying people who like this game for it's... visual aspect are "bad" or "evil", just maybe they are thinking with the wrong head. Simply put, as a budding game developer, I see the use of sexualization to sell titles as one of the most unimaginative and pathetic attempts to draw my interest. The game cover itself might as well proclaim "Fuck gameplay, story, and everything else important, we have BOOBIES, YAY! Aren't you happy you stupid male teenager? Yes you are, who's a good boy! You are!". It seems almost condescending to me. Sorry if that isn't my style.OT: I love how some people are pulling the moral card here. I for one am going to be honest here. I love it. I prefer seeing beautiful things over ugly things. Simple as that. And I don't get what some are trying to achieve by saying they keep away from games that have a sexual connotation to them. I can only speak for myself but I assume that you all are beyond the times where you heard the word 'penis' and had to giggle and laugh unable to do anything about it, right?
In that case, if you REALLY don't like the sexual part of a game just overlook it and see things as they are. In this case, DOA: it has always been a very good fighting game. I mean it is different from other fighting games in gameplay, fast-paced, it introduced interaction with stages to fighting games the best, easy to pick up to play against friends and still complex enough for more advanced gameplay, mindgames etc. And if you dig the visuals also, well: more power to you.
Putting women in your game doesn't equal supporting female rights. If they're only there for horn teenage males to wank off over, and bring nothing to the game but metal thongs and bras, they are really more sexist than, say, Gears of War, with it's all-male crew.I mean people are able to do it with Juri in Street Fighter, Dizzy in Guilty Gear, Noel in Blazblue and even Peach in Smash Brothers (jk... or not? ^^).
Why is it so hard to do with Dead or Alive? Probably the number of female characters. So in short: many female characters are bad...? I hope that this is not the reason because that would make all those people sexists and therefore on this topic, hypocrites.
There is a HUGE difference between having mature, sexual content in a game, and using women with melon-sized tits as wank material in a game. I agree with you that saying sex in a game is bad, then having violence is fine is just stupid. But there are different ways of presenting something, and sex in games is simply not presented in a mature (or for me) interesting manner. Mature sexual content might be a somewhat believable sex scene or three somewhere through the game (or a really cheesy one, see Mass Effect), an immature expression of sexuality is using a chick with HUGE tits to advertise your game, just to rack up more sales from horny teenage males.Treating a game with a sexual touch to it like it is a bad thing is beyond me. I don't get it. I mean some here called it an embarrassment and how this puts gamers in bad light blabla. So ripping people apart, shooting in the head - possibly with reference to real life wars - , brains and guts spilling out is A-Ok but breasts and booty are evil? You serious?