I think this thread exemplifies perfectly what a long way the transgender community still has to go to achieve some widespread public acceptance. Really, the amount of misinterpretations of scientific terminology in an effort to rationalize one's own phobias or searing hostility in here is rather staggering. In fact so much, that I think there is something more at work than a simple mistaken overgeneralizations based on limited evidence resulting in disgust. Fortunately for me, somebody in this thread did already hint at a very nice theory as to why this is:
OT: I don't have any quarrels if I have at least some attraction and I really enjoy the character.
Seemingly the pure idea that something exists that transcends the usual gender and sex boundaries perceived by the vast majority of people provides a real thread to their identity - otherwise they wouldn't have reacted like they did, making these constructions in an attempt to validate and protect their self. It really begs the question, though, why so many people identify so strongly with a quantity that should at least a priori have no intrinsic value apart from the pragmatic. Perhaps this is one of those few examples where actual social role models do still largely shape perception - a remnant or a sign of a patriarchic structure if you like. Definitely an interesting question to ponder...Katatori-kun said:I can't help but wonder if some of the more visceral responses in this thread aren't motivated by a thorough understanding of biology and are more the case of people being afraid of catching the gay.
OT: I don't have any quarrels if I have at least some attraction and I really enjoy the character.