No love for Gerry Lopez? Mr. Pipeline? The Goofyfoot Guru? The man who discovered G-Land? Greatest Surfer who ever lived and the best thing in that damn movie.Conan has always been about Darth Vader as Thulsa Doom and the Terminator as Conan
No love for Gerry Lopez? Mr. Pipeline? The Goofyfoot Guru? The man who discovered G-Land? Greatest Surfer who ever lived and the best thing in that damn movie.Conan has always been about Darth Vader as Thulsa Doom and the Terminator as Conan
I'm glad someone else spotted that too, otherwise I'd just feel immature...dragongit said:mmmmmmmmmmm... butt popcorn...
No no! Nono! NO NO NO NO NO!!! [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IXCK1EyP4s]K4RN4GE911 said:NO GOD!! No God please no, NO!! No!!! NOOOOOOOOOOO-!! [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umDr0mPuyQc]NLS said:I remember wathcing the first conan movie. Maybe I should go get the 2nd one.
Are we talking about the set design or that fact that Arnie was still in his physical prime at this point and the flab hadn't started to creep in just yet . True some of the sets were okay but the production values look much lower than the original and everything had that painted polystyrene look to it.Susan Arendt said:Truth. When Kareem Abdul-Jabbar is one of the leads in the film, you know it's not going to be good.Sovvolf said:Isn't that the one where Conan fights the mirror monster? if so DO,... NOT,... SEE,... IT seriously, my lord is that one bad. Conan in the first film (played by Arnie) had to good sense to keep his mouth closed for a good amount of it (seriously, he doesn't speak all that much in that movie) however in the sequel, he won't shut up, he as a plucky (read annoying) side kick and... and... its just awful.Susan Arendt said:No. No, no, no. No. Assuming you mean Conan the Destroyer, just....no.NLS said:I remember wathcing the first conan movie. Maybe I should go get the 2nd one.
That said, it does, at least, have some decent eye candy. It's pretty to look at in places.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tim5nU3DwIE]DazBurger said:No no! Nono! NO NO NO NO NO!!! [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IXCK1EyP4s]K4RN4GE911 said:NO GOD!! No God please no, NO!! No!!! NOOOOOOOOOOO-!! [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umDr0mPuyQc]NLS said:I remember wathcing the first conan movie. Maybe I should go get the 2nd one.
Set design and scenery. The effects are definitely weak, but there's some pretty decent glitz in there. I never thought Arnold was even slightly attractive.Sovvolf said:Are we talking about the set design or that fact that Arnie was still in his physical prime at this point and the flab hadn't started to creep in just yet . True some of the sets were okay but the production values look much lower than the original and everything had that painted polystyrene look to it.Susan Arendt said:Truth. When Kareem Abdul-Jabbar is one of the leads in the film, you know it's not going to be good.Sovvolf said:Isn't that the one where Conan fights the mirror monster? if so DO,... NOT,... SEE,... IT seriously, my lord is that one bad. Conan in the first film (played by Arnie) had to good sense to keep his mouth closed for a good amount of it (seriously, he doesn't speak all that much in that movie) however in the sequel, he won't shut up, he as a plucky (read annoying) side kick and... and... its just awful.Susan Arendt said:No. No, no, no. No. Assuming you mean Conan the Destroyer, just....no.NLS said:I remember wathcing the first conan movie. Maybe I should go get the 2nd one.
That said, it does, at least, have some decent eye candy. It's pretty to look at in places.
Though to give it the benefit of the doubt, at least they didn't end up putting him in modern day L.A -cough- Beastmaster 2 -cough-
i disagree and heres my proofxXxJessicaxXx said:haha at Erin's face xD. Also love the use of 'The Quote'. I'm not sure Conan is something that can be carried off seriously in this day and age but we will see.
Yeah, and although nobody realizes it, the character conveyed a lot of straight-up "civilized people are the real barbarians" moral commentary by the author. Bet we don't see that in the movies.thaluikhain said:I'm not usually a fan of these, but that was actually kinda funny.
...
I think a Conan movie could work, just not an Arnie type one...the original stories were very different, like a watered down Lovecraft with more muscles and less clothes.
I think you misread there, mate. I said "more/less" which is very different from "more-or-less" in context. I haven't seen the new film yet, so I can't comment on how close to the books it is.w00tage said:Yeah, and although nobody realizes it, the character conveyed a lot of straight-up "civilized people are the real barbarians" moral commentary by the author. Bet we don't see that in the movies.thaluikhain said:I'm not usually a fan of these, but that was actually kinda funny.
...
I think a Conan movie could work, just not an Arnie type one...the original stories were very different, like a watered down Lovecraft with more muscles and less clothes.
Regarding the "more-or-less faithful adaptation of the books" - why the heck is there still a "my village was slaughtered and I must avenge my father" plot? That's as far from the books as you can get fgodssakes. The character left his completely alive village and father for two reasons:
Operations said:Funny I dont remember Dave Prowse in Conanbut to me, Conan has always been about Darth Vader as Thulsa Doom
He's not supposed to be. The original Robert E. Howard stories are pulp yarns. It's just the Arnie/Milnius/Ollie North movie that had this Nietzchean meta-commentary on hippies and shell-shock, complete with Wagnerian soundtrack (RIP, Basil Poledouris).xXxJessicaxXx said:haha at Erin's face xD. Also love the use of 'The Quote'. I'm not sure Conan is something that can be carried off seriously in this day and age but we will see.
No, I misremembered when writing my post, my bad. I'd personally describe it as way less than more, given that it's got a plot premise from the first movieGrey Carter said:I think you misread there, mate. I said "more/less" which is very different from "more-or-less" in context. I haven't seen the new film yet, so I can't comment on how close to the books it is.w00tage said:Yeah, and although nobody realizes it, the character conveyed a lot of straight-up "civilized people are the real barbarians" moral commentary by the author. Bet we don't see that in the movies.thaluikhain said:I'm not usually a fan of these, but that was actually kinda funny.
...
I think a Conan movie could work, just not an Arnie type one...the original stories were very different, like a watered down Lovecraft with more muscles and less clothes.
Regarding the "more-or-less faithful adaptation of the books" - why the heck is there still a "my village was slaughtered and I must avenge my father" plot? That's as far from the books as you can get fgodssakes. The character left his completely alive village and father for two reasons:
I think you mean Hayden Christensen.Operations said:Funny I dont remember Dave Prowse in Conanbut to me, Conan has always been about Darth Vader as Thulsa Doom
Oh it wasn't that bad. It was a fun fantasy romp, and as enjoyably campy as beastmaster. Grace Jones and Kareem were great.Susan Arendt said:No. No, no, no. No. Assuming you mean Conan the Destroyer, just....no.NLS said:I remember wathcing the first conan movie. Maybe I should go get the 2nd one.
Ha I see, sadly its been a while since I last watched Conan the Destroyer (probably a good few years ago) so my memory is fuzzy when it comes to a lot of the sets. I can remember a few but they did come off as a little cheap and the rest just looked like your usual horse riding through field sets . I also remember the monster thing at the end looking pretty bad even for the standards of back then.Susan Arendt said:Set design and scenery. The effects are definitely weak, but there's some pretty decent glitz in there.
I see, don't worry I was just trying to make a poor joke. No offence intended .Susan Arendt said:I never thought Arnold was even slightly attractive.