omicron1 said:
Honestly, the amount of ridicule/ire directed at the ESRB's expanded ratings these days is rather confusing to me - as the point of the ESRB is to inform parents (including those who would rather not immerse themselves in bad language - yes, such people do exist) of the content of the game, and has no bearing on older, more responsible people's access to said game that I can see, it seems rather childish to poke fun at them for doing their job - a job that indirectly benefits the gaming public!
The ESRB expanded rating isn't meant for the hardcore gamer! Heck, it's not even meant for the casual gamer! It's meant for the parent trying to see if the content of the game fits within their particular standards for their children's access - similar, in all honesty, to a "family" review site for films. Yet it gets ridiculed up and down the Internet - and for what? For censoring coarse language? For making a list of all the possible "infractions" a parent might find in the game? Honestly...
My problems with the ESRB are that
A: They're completely self regulated and answerable to no one and yet still holds a massive degree of power over what is seen as "acceptable" content via deals with huge chain stores that won't stock a game unless it has an ESRB rating.
B: I find the list-like nature of ESRB ratings to be both misleading and easily manipulated by savvy developers. This results in developers being able to do what they want providing they avoid a few bullet points (no blood, no decapitations etc). While I don't expect every parent to play each and every game their child plays they should be watching, if not playing, some of the game to check for context and to discuss the issues raised by the game afterwards. Film ratings boards have a similar, easily manipulated system. For a good example, look how with some clever editing The Dark Knight managed to sail through with a PG12 rating despite a scene where the Joker jams a pencil into someone's eye socket.
C: I find "the F-word" and or F**K (look how friendly those asterisks are!) and variants thereof kind of ridiculous. But that's just a pet peeve.
Edit: Oh and to answer your point in the end of the first paragraph. About how the ratings have no bearing on people our age. I wish that were true. Being bumped into a higher age bracket has a notable effect on sales and many publishers will make drastic changes to their titles to avoid being bumped into the 15+ or dreaded AO ratings. That`s certainly not the ESRB`s fault (in fact that`s ALL about sleazy devs and publishers) but it illustrates how their policies are indirectly controlling the content in games. Throw in the fact there`s a different ratings group with a different set of standards in each and every major market and suddenly developers are on very shaky ground.