Critical Miss: The Guide To Skyrim Modders: Part 1

Hobonicus

New member
Feb 12, 2010
212
0
0
JoJoDeathunter said:
Love the expression on the sociopath's face. On an related note, I find it funny that some people claim that not being able to kill children breaks their immersion in a game where your health recovers within a couple of minutes and can be done instantly by eating food, you don't need to eat, drink or use the toilet to live, one tiny bit of addition weight makes you go from normal movement to very slow and you can rest by standing in one place.
Those are gameplay details designed to make the experience more fluid and enjoyable. Most of them are representative of authentic functions that would be tedious or pointless to include. Invincible children is contextually incorrect in the Elder Scrolls universe. When your health recovers quickly, or you don't have to stop twice a day to shit, it's for convenience, but it doesn't mean those things don't exist. It allows you to suspend your disbelief without losing anything within the context of the game.

Putting children in the game and then making them invincible while still following the other physical laws of the world hurts immersion because you know the developers did it for reasons unrelated to the game itself.

Do you also think JRPG battles literally happen in a turn-based fashion within the context of the game? When will people understand that gameplay elements and context cannot be so simply compared? Authenticity and realism are similar but ultimately different concepts. This is why we can't have nice things.

EDIT: And for the record, I don't have the mod, nor will I bother downloading it because I don't see a situation where I'd want my character to kill a child in the game. But at least I understand where other people are coming from and I'd never support restricting them or judging their fictional character.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
darkmind35 said:
They forgot the anime and nude mods.
Note the "Part 1". We'll get an obligatory Estrus reference yet!

OT: I am a texture connoisseur, through and through. My Oblivion looked utterly spectacular, and I intend to do the same to Skyrim.

http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/542892729611501086/D2D356AE03F5AACC2990A90670713A9576FCF633/
Modded water.

http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/542892729612361404/2841E6A206C2B158CAC639FF8B1224CBA2C7DC2F/
Better lighting.

http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/542892729612476054/0FE753BE59D03850AE831C73DC0484E9EBC5136F/
See-through windows.

http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/542892729611548520/D2E5A402A8853E5983F113B601C502C06CC4E794/
My draw distance goes far.

http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/542893277978516151/D7FF6F82F3E3B5FB6F32DCBD5AC42A9D3495E4BE/
Like, really far.

http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/542893372182626369/65DD723CECFC20E0463E09981A7B6DE862B32D5A/
Really... REALLY far.

Feel free to zoom in on those, they're 1920x1200.
 

sifffffff

New member
Oct 28, 2011
226
0
0
SpaceBat said:
That might have to do with the people fiercely against the mod never coming up with a single worthwhile argument as to why such a mod, especially when looking at the game it's made for (a game that lets you do the worst things you could imagine to every single innocent adult you see) aside from "because I think it's bad".

Both sides are filled with absolutely retarded arguments (can you say ad hominem?), stereotypes, illogical thinking and whatnot, so I find it hilarious that you're merely concentrating on one side. In fact, neither of the two sides are worth talking against. It's a stalemate, a stupid vs stupid discussion that will keep going until both sides shut the fuck up and move on to things not as trivial and unimportant as a mod for a game.
Alright... The logical argument you're stating here being essentially: "I can kill adults in the game therefore it is laughably stupid to be against also being able to kill children in the game."

I do appreciate this argument better than the "it breaks my immersion" argument because at least it has it's basis in logic.

In fact this would be a perfectly valid argument if we lived in a world devoid of ethics, morals and values. However we don't. Killing children is considered an ethical and moral taboo in cultures throughout the world. Most people would agree that killing a child in the real world is a bad thing to do. To many killing a child is much worse than killing an adult because they happen to be both the most trusting and most defenseless members of our species.

Okay but that's all in the real world. How does this apply to Skyrim?

In Skyrim your options of killing people are largely into two categories. Kill or be killed and Murder. The first category can be written off as killing in self defense. In the second category you have the player making the decision to kill. Within the game world this is classified as a crime. If you get caught you get punished. Even though the punishment is laughable "Here's some money now I'm innocent," there is still a punishment. The killable-children mod as I believe it's listed on Skyrim nexus has the same laughable punishment. If you get caught you can throw some gold at the problem and go on being the big damn hero even if you get your kicks killing kids on the weekend.

Ultimately I view it as a stupid, pointless addition to the game. My two main issues with the mod are separate from my opinion on it.

Lets say Fox News gets a hold of this. I love gaming. The last thing I want to see is another sensationalist news piece painting gamers as crazy psychopaths.

My second issue is what is says about the players who are using it. I know gaming is all about rampant escapism and getting to do shit you wouldn't do in real life. Like a daydream you get to play. I play Skyrim to climb massive mountains and fight dragons with a sword. Stuff I don't get to do in real life. Color it however you like if you download and use the mod you're saying that fighting dragons isn't enough. You want the ability to kill children to be part of your escapism and it's fucking weird.

End of wall of text. Sorry. But maybe you're right. Maybe I should just how did you so eloquently put it? Shut the fuck up with my retarded argument.
 

JoJo

and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Goat 🐐
Moderator
Legacy
Mar 31, 2010
7,162
130
68
Country
🇬🇧
Gender
♂
SirBryghtside said:
Honestly, I rarely hear people saying that they want it for immersion. I'm pro-murder (not downloaded the mod, though - I usually play them vanilla for at least the first time round) and it's because... well, why not?

If we're going to make up words that the other side has said, then I'll throw a couple into your mouth - self-righteous, overreactive, and judgemental. It's a videogame, with the option of downloading a mod which changes the game a bit. I just... I don't see how it affects anyone. Not the downloader, apart from that he has a bit of fun for about 5 minutes, and certainly not the people complaining about it who just seem to be sitting on their throne of righteousness the whole time.

I just... bleh. People take this waaay more seriously than it should be taken.
Well I did say some, not all, and you can find an example in this very thread of someone claiming it breaks immersion (post #82, who did write a very reasonable response though I disagree since I don't see children as actually being immortal in the TES universe, just within the limitations of the game, just like the eating/toilet/health etc) so I think it's a reasonable statement to make. For the record I wouldn't ban the mod, since I don't believe in censorship unless the material actually harms someone by it's production, but that doesn't mean I can't disapprove of it.

Edit: Post #85 (above this post) makes some very good points which are among the reasons why I disapprove of the mod.
 

LTK_70

New member
Aug 28, 2009
598
0
0
Wow, panel two is the spitting image of my character, in more than one way. I have to admit I did spend some time crouching down to admire the level of detail in the wildflowers. @_@
 

SpaceBat

New member
Jul 9, 2011
743
0
0
aftohsix said:
DAMN IT. I had written up an entire reply to your comment, only to see it get eaten up by the bugs this new, ugly escapist makeover is causing. I'm going to have to rewrite it, so you're going to have to wait for a bit. Sorry.
 

reachforthesky

New member
Jun 13, 2010
55
0
0
Going to go ahead and try to sum up the killing kids argument for those who are still on a high horse about it.

A) No, we do not want to kill kids in real life. Can I assume you like killing adults just because you do in a game? Not everyone sees them as anything more than the clump of polygons and sound-bytes that they are, you know.

B) Yes, it does ruin immersion when a kid is walking aimlessly through a stream of dragon fire. I understand that they're are other things that break immersion as well. You're point?

C) When the game has a child, or any invincible character for that matter, blatantly insult or otherwise slight you, that is simply the game spitting in your face and laughing at you for being stuck within its bullshit rules. If you don't find the idea of turning the tables and shattering those rules to pieces a little satisfying, maybe there's something wrong with you.

D) And finally, the developers don't even really care about whatever values they're holding up by putting this leash on the player. Babette is a 300-year-old vampire who has murdered countless victims for money and has enabled god knows how many more murders by supplying assassins with potions and poisons, but the player can't kill her, because she looks like a kid. They're clearly just satisfying some standard for the sake of their shareholders.

It amazes me how many people will happily slit a woman's throat during her wedding, assassinate a man's son in order to send his father into a depression, massacre a town's garrison of guards, or murder their own spouse and turn around and vilify people for wanting a game to follow its own fucking rules.
 

SpaceBat

New member
Jul 9, 2011
743
0
0
All right, so here it goes.

aftohsix said:
Alright... The logical argument you're stating here being essentially: "I can kill adults in the game therefore it is laughably stupid to be against also being able to kill children in the game."
Not exactly. I don't find it laughably stupid to be against also being able to kill children in the game. I merely find it weird that people believe there to be such a huge difference in sociopathic options between the vanilla and modded game. It is weird to be able to kill kids in Skyrim, though the rest of the killing options aren't exactly normal or good either.


aftohsix said:
So basically your argument is: "Due to child killing in games being taboo in most cultures, it is bad and wrong". Killing adult human beings in games used to be somewhat taboo in the past as well, while it is completely normal and acceptable now. This is not the result of us currently living in a world completely devoid of ethics, morals and values (as you so put it), but merely us having become desensitized to the image of adults dying in entertainment. People not being desensitized to kids dying in videogames is in no way a bad thing, mind you.

My opinion on the matter, the one part in which I disagree with you, is that desensitization has no effect for me on what I find right or wrong. I refuse to download the mod because I am not desensitized to that kind of stuff (also it's illegal), not because I find it something to be an absolute wrong.

So in the end, my opinion does not differ much from the opinions of the anti-mod group, except for the fact that I find the option to completely massacre every single innocent adult or non-human creature as they run away in fear, dismember them and play with their bodies (et cetera) to be weird as well. I'll use your quote on this...It is not enough to kill dragons, bandits or other enemies for some people, You want the ability to kill nearly every innocent person to be part of your escapism and it's fucking weird. Perhaps I'm alone on this, perhaps I should let desensitization affect my morals and values as well, but right now I don't. While I find the death of children in games to be more wrong than the death of adults, I do not see the one side as completely acceptable and normal and the other side as a horrifying thought.

I personally just don't find comments such as "I'm going to murder every innocent person" normal and not worth any attention while finding "I'm going to murder every innocent person, including kids" weird, unacceptable and whatnot. They're both weird as fuck to me.

aftohsix said:
Ultimately I view it as a stupid, pointless addition to the game.
So do I. I haven't downloaded it myself for multiple reasons I have already mentioned in my previous posts. Though I find my opinion on the mod irrelevant.

aftohsix said:
Lets say Fox News gets a hold of this. I love gaming. The last thing I want to see is another sensationalist news piece painting gamers as crazy psychopaths.
If Fox News wants to paint gamers as crazy psychopaths, they'll do so. It's not as if their news castings are covered with facts and not skewed or exaggerated immensely in any way. If they want to put gamers in a bad light, they'll do it, regardless of the ammo available.

aftohsix said:
My second issue is what is says about the players who are using it. I know gaming is all about rampant escapism and getting to do shit you wouldn't do in real life. Like a daydream you get to play. I play Skyrim to climb massive mountains and fight dragons with a sword. Stuff I don't get to do in real life. Color it however you like if you download and use the mod you're saying that fighting dragons isn't enough. You want the ability to kill children to be part of your escapism and it's fucking weird.
First of all, you're assuming that the majority of people download it solely so they can go on a child killing rampage. You may be right, but you have no evidence to base this on. Secondly, you are completely entitled to find it weird and I will agree with you in the cases that people download it solely to kill kids. This does not give you a green light to go all out on assuming things, be condescending and attacking the people who do download the mod. U am once again not saying that you do this, but this appears to be a very common sight in these threads. The other point I would like to bring up is brought up above and I do not want to repeat myself.

aftohsix said:
End of wall of text. Sorry. But maybe you're right. Maybe I should just how did you so eloquently put it? Shut the fuck up with my retarded argument.
That wasn't aimed at you. Have you read some of the threads "discussing" this matter? There's rarely any discussion to be found. Nearly all you will find is the pro-mod side coming with their arguments regarding immersion, indifference and from time to time wanting to kill kids, while the other side mostly consists out of people not liking it and it therefore being bad, constant ad hominem attacks and nearly nothing else.

There are very few posts that actually explain their viewpoint, as you have done here, which is why I hate this subject. I don't mind people liking or not liking the mod, to be quite honest I don't care as I firmly believe that the average gamer knows the difference between fantasy and reality and that violent game events have little to no dangerous effect on the player (at least I hope so. Or else we're fucked), but I will not attack either side. If people would discuss this subject as adults, I would love reading through the threads. Unfortunately, I have yet to see a thread regarding this subject that did actually move forward and not end up as a flame war.

I understand that my initial post came off as aggressive, I was merely somewhat irritated that either side has the nerve to look down upon the other based on their arguments, while neither side bring up a reasonable amount of reasonable posts to the table. It wasn't an attack at you directly, but simply what I believe is generally the state of this subject. I apologize if you took it as an insult.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
aftohsix said:
Lets say Fox News gets a hold of this. I love gaming. The last thing I want to see is another sensationalist news piece painting gamers as crazy psychopaths.
Here's the flaw in this argument: If Fox News did that, it would be because they wanted the game censored, or at least they wanted to get the ratings from the kind of people who would. What you're suggesting is we censor it in advance so that they don't have to do it for us. In what world is that protecting the medium? It's more like surrendering without even waiting for the challenge.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Look, I'm not a sociopath. I wasn't upset at the "no killing children" rule because because I'm crazy, homocidal, or one of these people that says "the game's not realistic if you have a race of immortal children running around!"

No, for me, it was purely and simply I don't take any crap from videogame characters.

In GTA, when an NPC motorist cuts me off or t-bones me as I'm running a red light, I stop what I'm doing and ensure that said NPC has a very...VERY bad day.

Dragon Age 2 was one of my favorite games not because every single cave was exactly like every other cave, thus making certain you never get lost...no, it was because they made every enemy who has a conversation with you before the fight just THE most egotistical, snarky, self-assured bastards who sneer and tell you to bow before their might and powah before you utterly destroy them in - more often than not - rather brutal ways.

So when some punk kid in Skyrim declares how he's not afraid of me even if I am his elder as though he's about ready to beat my ass...first thing I wanna do is shank the little bastard to teach him the lesson of "Don't disrespect your elders...especially if they're strangers...wearing creepy dark masks...and holding a blade that's glowing red." And what about the little brat who takes one look at you and says "Pfffft, I thought adventurers were supposed to look tough" or "*sigh* Another wanderer here to lick my father's boots...good for you." It's as though Bethesda intentionally made each child just THE most snottiest, brattiest, desperately-needs-to-be-disciplined little creep possible SPECIFICALLY because they knew you couldn't kill them.

Actually I was rather surprised and quite disappointed to find out that there's actually quite a large number of Highlanders roaming around through Skyrim...given my vindictive style of play, it really cramps my style when I walk into the palace in Windhelm (which is oddly populated by every noble from The Reach), have someone say he wants to bash my skull in, and come to find out if I try to test his bravado, the best I can do is put him into Last Stand for a couple seconds.

Le Sigh.....
 

Yokai

New member
Oct 31, 2008
1,982
0
0
You forgot the modders so sexually desperate and somehow incapable of finding the vast troves of free internet porn that they whip together a shoddy nude reskin less than a week after the game comes out.

Seriously, browsing the Nexus on November 15th, I was already confronted by blurry nipples. Stay classy, guys.
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
16,902
9,589
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
Anyone know how to get rid of Olaf's Cat? Found the stupid thing in some random chest, couldn't drop it and I've been lugging it around for thirty hours of gameplay now.

[small]Seriously, how does a cat weigh forty-five pounds? Does Olaf breed ocelots?[/small]
 

DeadCoyote

New member
Feb 1, 2011
31
0
0
The kid... she is so helpless and so uderstanding of what's coming. Somehow reminded me the girl from The City Of Lost Children.

Please don't kill her, mr. sociopath! T_T
 

Newtonyd

New member
Apr 30, 2011
234
0
0
I tried to tell my roommate that I probably wouldn't ever buy an Xbox because I loved the mods that come with PC games. He just couldn't understand why I thought that the game is measurably better on the PC.

I saw that they were releasing Minecraft on the Xbox, and it occurred to me that, with all the mods I usually play it with, the vanilla game became almost unplayable for me. It's a weird feeling.
 

LazyAza

New member
May 28, 2008
716
0
0
I hope their is a panel dedicated in part 2 specifically to the one guy who HAD to have his Skyrim white women clean. You think I'm kidding? look: http://www.fileplanet.com/223432/220000/fileinfo/Elder-Scrolls-V:-Skyrim---No-Dirty-Bodies-Mod-%28Caucasian-Female%29
 

somonels

New member
Oct 12, 2010
1,209
0
0
I don't get it. Is Erin an asshole to strangers or is the sociopath part just wrong?

Edit: pfft, not Gwen but Erin.