Critics Ruin Video Games? ?Good!

Recommended Videos

OniaPL

New member
Nov 9, 2010
1,057
0
0
Draech said:
I think the real point of the sacrificing their beauty is even further in that they are sacrificing their very ideals in order to endure. Here they are not just terminating a monster, but also going to use said monster in the future.

But hey it is just one guy's opinion. I may very well be reading what isn't there into it.
True. Forgot that the woman in the end was the same woman.
It makes me very excited for the game itself... I wonder if they will be able to follow the red thread they've laid out in this trailer. I'd hate if it turned out to be another Dead Island.

All in all, I find it to be an interesting trailer, and I love it that it sparks so many different interpretations (albeit I don't understand the claims that it is sexist).
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,776
0
0
JudgeGame said:
I'm assuming that the "moaning" you are referring to are the criticisms of pervasive misogyny and racism in videogames. That isn't game design.

The articles that are strictly about game design contain very little "moaning".
Out of the first two pages there are 20 'articles'. Six are about sexism. Seven are self-promotion of art or his own indiegogo project. Five of them are about Batman and the art direction of it, they do provide an analysis, so great. Out of 20 articles, on a site called "How to make game design not suck" over half the articles don't even bother with game design. And the six that do only deal with art design.

Also, pervasive? What games are you playing?
 

BytByte

New member
Nov 26, 2009
425
0
0
This thread went from misguided to hilarious, and now that there is someone writing a preface to his political agenda, it has fulfilled all the requirements to make the best thread imaginable, and in only 4 pages. These discussions of sexism and agendas and "arm blades are a dumb idea" really aren't conducive on the internet b/c of everyone's strong beliefs. There should be some kind of funny picture at the beginning of every page to defuse the situation a bit, because hostility seems to be the go to emotion for some people.

Besides, I thought the trailer looked pretty kickin.
 
Aug 31, 2012
1,774
0
0
GunsmithKitten said:
And actually, to be honest, I'm not even sure what piece of cyberware that IS if it's in Cyberpunk 2020 canon. It ain't Scratchers, it ain't Rippers, it ain't Monocutters, it's not a Cybersaw.

Crap, now I need to go sifting through old Chromebooks and Interface magazine PDF's to see....
DoPo said:
It's supposed to 57 years in the future, though, isn't it? It could be some new tech. I dunno, however, I have yet to pick up the books. Been looking forward to it, though.
It looks a bit like a fancy version of a BiggRipp from Chromebook 4.
 

ShinyCharizard

New member
Oct 24, 2012
2,033
0
0
The Artificially Prolonged said:
Okay I've read the article and most of this thread. I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry, all I know is my head hurts now.

On the article itself it seemed to try and raise some good points but is dragged down by some blatant factual errors, out of context examples and a confrontational tone which make me question the intent of this article. I feel that this article may be trying to provoke an angry reaction rather than facilitate a discussion on the issue.
Yeah this. The whole article is pretty much just massive flamebait.
 

alphamalet

New member
Nov 29, 2011
544
0
0
This is officially my favorite thread ever. I can't count how many times I've bursted out laughing at some of this crap.

We have misguided anger, political manifestos, and humor all in 120 posts. It's fucking brilliant.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,908
0
0
OniaPL said:
Draech said:
I think the real point of the sacrificing their beauty is even further in that they are sacrificing their very ideals in order to endure. Here they are not just terminating a monster, but also going to use said monster in the future.

But hey it is just one guy's opinion. I may very well be reading what isn't there into it.
True. Forgot that the woman in the end was the same woman.
It makes me very excited for the game itself... I wonder if they will be able to follow the red thread they've laid out in this trailer. I'd hate if it turned out to be another Dead Island.

All in all, I find it to be an interesting trailer, and I love it that it sparks so many different interpretations (albeit I don't understand the claims that it is sexist).
It's not sexist, and that's kind of the point, and what I was getting at with the huge essay I wrote above (which was just trolled).

That's what lib-trolling is all about. They take something like this, claim it's sexist, and boom! instant platform, instant attention. You don't think it's sexist, now they try and present you as the bad guy. This kind of thing has happened a lot, and really the whoe issue is that there is backlash to it, where more and more people are attacking the trolls and giving them exactly the kind of attention and trouble they aren't trying to generate. The article is a very clever attempt at QQing over the failure of this technique, and how some of the most high profile trolling attempts have lead to some rather epic counter attacks.

The basic claim by lib-trolls in response to the CP2020 trailer is that because it's a female cyborg that has gone berserk and is being brought down, it's sexist, because it's depicting violence against women. Kind of weak overall, but that's a lib-troll for you, people have lapped it up in the past though, which is why you see the attempt.

The irony is that before the most recent interplay, there was an issue throughout gaming about how women were placed on a pedestel and weren't handled well in games. The basic arguement being that a female character could be the baddest fighter in all the land, up until she's going to be captured, at which point some bad guy comes up, does some cheezy move like an arm grab, and then leads her off or whatever. This was kind of dealt with, and we've seen incidences of female characters being more realistilly defeated in appropriate and realistic situations, and people have complained about the results as being sexist because it shows girls being hit, punched, kicked, shot, etc. A situation which is fine in reverse if it's happening to a guy in general, or done to a guy by a girl. There being little differance between say "Arkham City" with Catwoman clobbering a bunch of overly muscular macho men with incredibly brutal moves, and Agent 47 doing it to a bunch of of sexy female assasins in "Hitman Absolution". We achieved equal treatment, and now people complain because making an issue out of it when a guy does it has in the past been able to get someone instant attention. What's differance right now is that the gaming community in general has stopped responding to the lib-trolls, and actually counter attacking when people complain about this stupid crap for attention.

There is nothing wrong with, or sexist about, the CP 2020 trailer, and that's exactly the point. If you see that, then you understand the issue, and why there is so much anger being thrown at people who try and make an issue out of it for attention.
 

Nieroshai

New member
Aug 20, 2009
2,940
0
0
erttheking said:
Draech said:
Not really feeling it I got to say.

The devotion to Sarkeesian's drivel as well fighting up imaginary enemies is making it hard for me to take this as serious as the author intended. I am sorry when you start critiquing the Cyberpunk 2077 without any sort of understanding of what the trailer is portraying and then start using it as springboard for another Sexism argument I am going to stop listening.
What was cyberpunk 2077 portraying? I'm sorry, I don't get the damn trailer at all. The premise seems to be "people are getting a lot of implants, people with implants want to kill the meatbags, men in combat gear shooting half naked lady with impractical looking blades coming out of her arms and massive honking tits. Oh and her skin is bulletproof apparently." I'm sorry but what the flying fuck was going on in that trailer? Why did she have to be half naked? Why did she need the F cup? I don't get why that trailer got everyone so hyped for the game, it couldn't turn me off faster.
It's made for fans of the P&P Cyberpunk RPG. The game whose entire purpose was to kit your toon in cybernetics and be a postapocalyptic badass. As for the naked, it's a game made by CD Projekt Red about a campy-as-hell cyberpunk RPG /shrugs
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
Nieroshai said:
erttheking said:
Draech said:
Not really feeling it I got to say.

The devotion to Sarkeesian's drivel as well fighting up imaginary enemies is making it hard for me to take this as serious as the author intended. I am sorry when you start critiquing the Cyberpunk 2077 without any sort of understanding of what the trailer is portraying and then start using it as springboard for another Sexism argument I am going to stop listening.
What was cyberpunk 2077 portraying? I'm sorry, I don't get the damn trailer at all. The premise seems to be "people are getting a lot of implants, people with implants want to kill the meatbags, men in combat gear shooting half naked lady with impractical looking blades coming out of her arms and massive honking tits. Oh and her skin is bulletproof apparently." I'm sorry but what the flying fuck was going on in that trailer? Why did she have to be half naked? Why did she need the F cup? I don't get why that trailer got everyone so hyped for the game, it couldn't turn me off faster.
It's made for fans of the P&P Cyberpunk RPG. The game whose entire purpose was to kit your toon in cybernetics and be a postapocalyptic badass. As for the naked, /shrugs
Ah, then I'm not the target audience. Well, can't really argue with that.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
daveman247 said:
erttheking said:
Yeah, but blood soaked blade arms and massive (pretty fake looking) tits clash pretty horribly IMHO
Yup, they do. That is the point! As i said before as with most settings like this (think 2000AD, judge dredd type stuff) DO go over the top with things. But if its not your cup of tea, thats cool :)

To be honest i never thought about anything to do with the ladies boobs, too busy looking at all the other cool stuff going on. Theres more going on in the background than you first think.
Huh...you know I took another look at the trailer and it's really not that bad now that I think about it. I guess it's the kind of trailer you need to watch more than once. I still think they could've been a LITTLE more classy though, but I'm ok with it. I just hope that the combat with this game isn't a bore, I heard that was a problem with the Witcher... you know what, a sci-fi RPG that has heavy emphasis on story? Fuck it, I need something to fill the hole that Bioware left. I'll get it when it comes out. Wait it'll probably be a PC game...crap. Aw well, the Witcher got a 360 port.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,855
15
43
JudgeGame said:
Dude, that only makes it more disturbing. Executing a prostitute for her depraved ways is very touchy. It isn't cool. This isn't the kind of thing a normal person is supposed to be "hyped" over. It's a bunch of dudes killing a hooker because she's a slut. You seriously don't see why some people have a problem with that?

And yeah all the no soul and conformity. There's a thing called tone in fiction. The tone reflects the emotions and thoughts the creator wants the audience to experience. The tone is telling me "Look at how awesome this is!". Sorry. That isn't awesome. Some fascist cops killing a woman for her sins isn't awesome. It's sad and scary.

I'm not against the idea of a exploring that scenario, but telling me this is an awesome scenario is fucked up.
was she a hooker?

they were killing her because she OD'd on augmentations and went nutty.....thats it really
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,855
15
43
erttheking said:
What was cyberpunk 2077 portraying? I'm sorry, I don't get the damn trailer at all. The premise seems to be "people are getting a lot of implants, people with implants want to kill the meatbags, men in combat gear shooting half naked lady with impractical looking blades coming out of her arms and massive honking tits. Oh and her skin is bulletproof apparently." I'm sorry but what the flying fuck was going on in that trailer? Why did she have to be half naked? Why did she need the F cup? I don't get why that trailer got everyone so hyped for the game, it couldn't turn me off faster.
I cant remember be half naked or her bit tits....

she was going crazy, so the specalist squad took her down..seemed pretty straight forward
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
Vault101 said:
erttheking said:
What was cyberpunk 2077 portraying? I'm sorry, I don't get the damn trailer at all. The premise seems to be "people are getting a lot of implants, people with implants want to kill the meatbags, men in combat gear shooting half naked lady with impractical looking blades coming out of her arms and massive honking tits. Oh and her skin is bulletproof apparently." I'm sorry but what the flying fuck was going on in that trailer? Why did she have to be half naked? Why did she need the F cup? I don't get why that trailer got everyone so hyped for the game, it couldn't turn me off faster.
I cant remember be half naked or her bit tits....

she was going crazy, so the specalist squad took her down..seemed pretty straight forward
Yeah it'd been awhile since I watched the trailer, I needed a refresher.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,855
15
43
WaitWHAT said:
Me too. I just cannot, for the life of me, understand the hype around it. Oh, it's a trailer that shows absolutely zero gameplay and almost no relevant or understandable story. I'm just flooded with confidence. Hang on, I'm wrong to by cynical because it uses the word "cyberpunk". Well then, guess that proves me wrong! Srsly, wtf?
its jsut a teaser...its only suposed to convey tone and setting and mood, being a fan of cyberpunk (the genre, not the thing this game is based on) I'm excited at the possabilities
JudgeGame said:
They don't look like blades to me. I work in a kitchen. I know what a blade looks like. Also, the scene lasts less than one second. I'm only human, you know.
you can't make the trailer what you think it is even if you try reeeally reeeally hard


fact is: you are wrong, you watched, heard, interpreted the trailer wrong...its you, not the trailer

even if some were confused most understood basically this lady was being killed because she went psycho
 

bastardofmelbourne

New member
Dec 11, 2012
1,038
0
0
The article is a piece of shit.

The lady in the Cyberpunk 2077 trailer wasn't a hooker. Why do hookers need arm scythes?

Gay NPCs in SWTOR aren't being segregated onto a single planet. They're just being introduced in the Makeb expansion. They have to put new content somewhere, and it makes no sense to put it on planets people won't be playing on.

Grievous misrepresentation of supply and demand mechanics.

Really egregious use of straw men.

I deleted a longer rant here because it occurred to me that I can't really respond to this in a productive way. I can't respond to this article's argument without wasting time pointing out all factual inaccuracies and misrepresentations. This is exactly why it's so freaking hard to have a productive discussion about sexism in gaming; all the bullshit peddled by both sides that has to be shot down before you can get to something worthwhile. This article isn't interested in talking about sexism. It just wants to condemn something.
 

Dr. Cakey

New member
Feb 1, 2011
517
0
0
Therumancer said:
Hi, I'm a full-time liberal and part-time troll, which I believe linguistically makes me a lib-troll, and I think you're both misrepresenting my views and dramatically overestimating my intelligence.

Unless a lib-troll is someone who trolls Mad Libs, in which case your posts do not apply to me.

alphamalet said:
This is officially my favorite thread ever. I can't count how many times I've bursted out laughing at some of this crap.

We have misguided anger, political manifestos, and humor all in 120 posts. It's fucking brilliant.
We need to get this thread stickied so years from now people can go back and read it.
 

bastardofmelbourne

New member
Dec 11, 2012
1,038
0
0
Dark wolverine said:
Great article.

Criticism is an important thing that at least should be heard out. Especially nowadays or when it refers to misogyny. While there are those that are too quick to accuse something of something that isn't there, it's important not to dismiss all criticism, because just as often there's a genuine problem that needs addressing.
The article equates criticism of criticism with suppression of criticism. This is mistaken.

All criticism should be heard out. That also means no critic should be immune from criticism. If the author criticises Cyberpunk 2077 for being sexist, and I criticise his criticism - for being unfounded, inaccurate, or biased - that is not suppression or marginalisation. I'm exercising the exact same right he is. And you, or anyone else, can criticise my views as well.

That's the marketplace of ideas. If we do it properly, the soundest criticisms are given the most weight because they are the most able to withstand other people's criticisms. If we do it improperly, like the asshat who wrote this article wants us to, it becomes a pointless flame war. Just a whole bunch of people contradicting each other and repeating bad arguments and bad facts over and over.
 

bastardofmelbourne

New member
Dec 11, 2012
1,038
0
0
erttheking said:
What was cyberpunk 2077 portraying? I'm sorry, I don't get the damn trailer at all. The premise seems to be "people are getting a lot of implants, people with implants want to kill the meatbags, men in combat gear shooting half naked lady with impractical looking blades coming out of her arms and massive honking tits. Oh and her skin is bulletproof apparently." I'm sorry but what the flying fuck was going on in that trailer? Why did she have to be half naked? Why did she need the F cup? I don't get why that trailer got everyone so hyped for the game, it couldn't turn me off faster.
I think your question's already been answered, but I read the trailer as establishing the setting and tone of the game. The city is grim and noirish. The police are Stormtroopers. The buildings reach up farther than you can see and make you feel as if you're being buried alive when you look up. Artificial beauty is contrasted with a scene of gruesome violence. The news is reporting it like it's normal to have a woman go berserk in the street and kill a dozen people. At the end, the murderer is recruited into the same task force that is supposed to stop murderers like her. Criminals and police are the same people in different clothes.

It's less "This is the story of our game" and more "This is what we want our game to feel like." Considering that the project is still in the conceptual stage this is exactly the kind of marketing they need to do.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,908
0
0
Dr. Cakey said:
Therumancer said:
Hi, I'm a full-time liberal and part-time troll, which I believe linguistically makes me a lib-troll, and I think you're both misrepresenting my views and dramatically overestimating my intelligence.

Unless a lib-troll is someone who trolls Mad Libs, in which case your posts do not apply to me.

alphamalet said:
This is officially my favorite thread ever. I can't count how many times I've bursted out laughing at some of this crap.

We have misguided anger, political manifestos, and humor all in 120 posts. It's fucking brilliant.
We need to get this thread stickied so years from now people can go back and read it.
A lib-troll is someone who uses liberal philsophies to troll, targeting liberals with the attempt to get them rallied as much as anyone else.

I used the term to state a differance between what I'm talking about and someone who is genuinely trying to make a point or doing something they believe in, as opposed to trying to stir up trouble and get attention.

I'm pretty middle of the road politically myself (where I swing left rarely comes up on these forums), despite what a lot of people might think, so to pick something in general off the general topics, let's say your expressing a left wing attitude towards unions and workers rights, argueing with someone whose supporting employers rights and the right of businesses to do what they want to employees as a benefit of their position. That makes you a liberal, your actually trying to make a legitimate, constructive, point about an actual issue, regardless of whether anyone agrees with you.

A lib-troll is someone who realizes that simply mentioning sexism, homophobia, and other hot button social issues is enough to get a stampede going, people willing to jump in and start attacking without really thinking things through simply due to the issue. As a result they decide to try and CREATE issues to stir up trouble, so they can watch the chaos unfold, similar to yelling fire in a crowded movie theater. You go to a set of forums or community known to heavily be populated by people who swing to the left, you pick something noticible and say "that's sexist" with a weak justification, and then watch everyone pile on it, and go to elaborate lengths to attack whoever created it based off of whatever vague reasons they concocted.

That's a simple version of it, but the phenomena exists, and people are catching onto it. This is why you actually have things like the "Hitman Absolution" trailer being an issue, or why the "Cyberpunk 2020" trailer is being called contreversial even if a lot of people can't see it. It's because someone looking to cause trouble, came walking up, pretty much said "that's sexist" and then tons of people pig-piled on it to attack the politically incorrect boogie man without the slightest bit of consideration for whether the claims were true or it was put into context.

Of course I'd imagine your jokes (and the troll mentioning "Faux News") here generally come from the reaction of "OMG Therumancer mentioned Liberal in a negative context" without even bothering to read how it was intended, what it was being used for, or what the accusation was. In this case I carefully chose the term I was going to use to differentiate it from liberals in general, rather than saying all liberals were trolls.

People might actually want to read what I say, and the context, before jumping to conclusions. My posts tend to be long but that's because I convey a lot of information and along with it intended context.

Also if you want to get technical I've actually been pretty positive towards liberals as a whole during this, because part of my point is that a lot of the aggressiveness is from people not falling for it to the extent they used to, and that includes liberals. The reason why a certain female blogger generated such an epic amount of hate with her trolling attempt was that a lot of the people she was expecting to support her, rather vehemently turned on her, and truthfully people who realize there has been an attempt to manipulate them like this are oftentimes the worst of all. I wouldn't be surprised if we ever found out who made some of the worst threats and attacks, it turned out to be people who would have supported a real woman's right issue rather vehemently. I also wouldn't be surprised if a lot of them were from girls, because honestly, girls tend to be surprisingly nasty to each other when they get pissed.