"Honey, that laptop sure seems eager to take showers with you. Are you sure there's nothing wrong?"The man was finally caught when he installed the software on a younger girl's computer. Her mother became suspicious of the recurring error messages, so she called the police and the scam was uncovered.
And people complied? Seriously? They didn't think for a second that steam (which is basically moisture) might wreck something?So he created fake error messages that said there was a problem with an internal sensor and the only way to solve this was to put the computer "near hot steam for several minutes." Supposedly the steam would clean the sensor.
Unless you're over ninety or under ten, there's really no excuse for not knowing that exposing electronic devices to moisture isn't going to fix whatever problem they have. No one's saying that this guy doesn't deserve to be punished. It's just hard to feel sympathy for people who only became victims because of their own willful ignorance. Anyway, what is stupidity besides a lack of conventional knowledge?Simiathan said:No. As I've said before, lack of technological knowledge doesn't equate to stupidity, and it certainly doesn't mean you deserve to have naked pictures of yourself stored on some fat pervert's computer. Believe it or not, a great part of the population is not as technologically savvy as those here on the Escapist, and are open to exploitation as a result. The piece of filth here is to blame entirely for his actions; saying that the victims deserve blame because they were "asking for it" is the type of logic that only morons and creeps follow.
Okay, here's a question then.tsb247 said:I see so many people commenting on the victim's intelligence. It may not be a matter of intelligence, but rather one of irnorance.
Some people just aren't as knowledgeable about electronics as many of us are. Believe me, some people just have never been taught.
Think of it this way. I am an aerospace engineering major. I know a great deal about airplanes and what makes them fly. I am good at math, physics, and am quite literate. However, I know very little about bio-chemistry. If someone were to take me into a bio-chemistry lab and expect me to run even the simplest experiment, I would probably be completely lost. Those people my assume I'm stupid because what comes easily for them would be quite difficult and foreign to me. I just don't understand bio-chemistry. However, the same would be true if I brought them into a wind tunnel and expected them to interpret CFD data.
Some people just don't understand the electronics that they surround themselves with. They work, and many people don't care how or why.
I don't know. I once had a customer I performed an onsite repair for ask if I was going to. Probably shoulda ran away right there.vansau said:When we take our laptops in to be repaired, it's generally assumed that the dude working on them won't take sexual advantage of us.
And skeevy computer technicians take back the lead from skeevy principals! What will the next grievous privacy violation be? Tune in next week and find out!vansau said:But it turns out that's just what happened in Southern California, where a computer tech used the machines he was working on to take compromising pictures of his clients.
Okay, guy is a pervert who deserves to get his junk put in a meat grinder. But people fell for this often enough to get THOUSANDS of pictures? Even assuming 100 stills per victim, that's at least 20 people!vansau said:Harwell, however, knew that he needed to do something more to get these women to walk in front of the camera without any clothes on. So he created fake error messages that said there was a problem with an internal sensor and the only way to solve this was to put the computer "near hot steam for several minutes." Supposedly the steam would clean the sensor.
Damn, I feel sorry for the legit people who work there. And I thought the shop I work in was hitting hard times.vansau said:Rezitech has also claimed that, "To [our] knowledge, Mr. Harwell did not commit any of the alleged offenses while performing work on behalf of Rezitech or while working on Rezitech computers or the computers of Rezitech customers." That said, whether this statement is true or not remains to be seen.
I suppose, but the truth is rather more practical: We don't give a damn. Seriously, even if it wasn't a firing offense, I am NOT going to waste my time trolling through 500 folders of digital camera photos in the hopes of there being one folder where someone gets naked. The Internet is over yonder, and in the same length of time it takes me to navigate to "My Pictures" on a customer's PC I can be downloading porn catering to any number of fetishes I might have. The only people who would dig through personal stuff are severely broken nuts who would've been peeping toms 100 years ago. This guy would be the town weirdo who tries to convince people he's a traveling doctor.cainx10a said:Isn't respecting your customer privacy one of the golden rule for IT professionals? Unless said customer is a pedo or a terrorist ... or a V.I.P? :s
What does this mean? Is this a Tyler Durden type of situation?icyneesan said:Hey that guy looks like me!
...Uh oh...