With like that will come out in the trial, but we'll have to wait I guess...Able Seacat said:That's horrible. Did this guy have any motives or was it just a random event?
With like that will come out in the trial, but we'll have to wait I guess...Able Seacat said:That's horrible. Did this guy have any motives or was it just a random event?
Hornet0404 said:Boom.Tanis said:
Godwin's Law has once again been met.
Also I don't think that it's as much Gun Control to keep guns out of the hands of crooks but more to make it easier to lock them up (for possessing illegal firearms).
Hitler didn't have to ban guns, the Weimar government that preceded him already had six years prior. Mostly because the Nazis and the Communists kept having running gun battles in the streets.Tanis said:Picture is a LITTLE old, but the point still stands...
Do you actually know no one in the theatre was armed? It might not have helped necessarily: there was an armed deputy [http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2000/columbine.cd/Pages/DEPUTIES_TEXT.htm] at Columbine High School who exchanged shots with Harris but didn't manage to stop him. This might have also been a situation where the pistol-packing deputy couldn't match a shooter with a rifle. What's your solution for that? Should people be allowed to carry rifles into enclosed public spaces?Tanis said:If just two or three people in that theater were armed, and went through the proper training...there would probably be a LOT less bodies.
I'm actually not a knee-jerk "ban all guns" person. I'm okay with civilians owning and using guns in certain circumstances. But I'm equally opposed to ridiculous "armed citizens solve all problems" rhetoric.Tanis said:It's childish to think that 'banning all the guns' will stop criminals, or prevent massacres.
His lawyer is already telling him to blame video games.cpt blackamar said:With like that will come out in the trial, but we'll have to wait I guess...Able Seacat said:That's horrible. Did this guy have any motives or was it just a random event?
This is why we need to ban guns...Tanis said:*waits for the 'those people' to start preaching 'this is why we need to ban guns' crap*
No. STOP. Both of you.GoddyofAus said:It's purile and juvenile responses like this that allowed this, Columbine, Virginia Tech and every other massacre to happen in the first place.Tanis said:*waits for the 'those people' to start preaching 'this is why we need to ban guns' crap*
It's ironic you brought that up, because following that massacre, the Government at the time introduced tough new gun laws, and there hasn't been a massacre of its size in Australia since.Baldr said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Arthur_massacre_%28Australia%29STENDEC1 said:Queue all the conservative Americans who'll claim that this attack is in no way a just cause for tighter gun control. Rather the opposite. After all, if everyone had guns you'd have less shootings wouldn't you?
It's times like these I'm extremely pleased to live in Australia.
Yeah.
No of course not, it's never the time that's the problem. It's much easier for those with the agenda to sweep the issue under the rug under the guise of "prudence for the victims", but I tell you what; the moment those same victims move from grief to anger, you will be hearing a lot more of it.UNHchabo said:No. STOP. Both of you.GoddyofAus said:It's purile and juvenile responses like this that allowed this, Columbine, Virginia Tech and every other massacre to happen in the first place.Tanis said:*waits for the 'those people' to start preaching 'this is why we need to ban guns' crap*
This is not the time or place to debate politics. Go start your own thread.
I hope for a full recovery from all currently in the hospital. I feel for the families of those involved.
Fine. Maybe this is a good time to discuss it. Regardless, THIS THREAD is not the place. Some of us are looking for a factual account of what happened, because it happened less than 12 hours ago.GoddyofAus said:No of course not, it's never the time that's the problem. It's much easier for those with the agenda to sweep the issue under the rug under the guise of "prudence for the victims", but I tell you what; the moment those same victims move from grief to anger, you will be hearing a lot more of it.
true, true. bad enough Heath Ledger died after the previous one now this. make me sickStabby Joe said:This story offends me dearly. Not just as a sane human (that's already a given no doubt), no no. This also offends me as an avid cinema goer, Batman fan and as someone who likes socials. It's sad that all these went out because they wanted a good time with friends and/or family with a common interest and excitement... ruined and then some.
Seems to work pretty well over here in the UK. Although disarming everyone in the USA would be a nigh-impossible task now unfortunately.Tanis said:It's childish to think that 'banning all the guns' will stop criminals, or prevent massacres.
I will admit that this sort of thing is one of the reasons I'm against the death penalty. To do this there is clearly something psychologically wrong with the man and I'd rather not punish him because of some faulty wiring in his brain. I accept that he possibly won't fall under "has difficulty functioning" type of insane, but there is something up with the way he thinks. I just think he should be locked up away from everyone else to prevent it happening again and, if at all possible, treated.the doom cannon said:And this is one reason I advocate for the death penalty.
Probably the same kind who brought a baby to a sci-fi somewhathorror when I visited a theater in Manhattan.Novaova said:Who brings a four month-old baby to a midnight premiere of an action movie?John Funk said:The casualties included a four-month old baby who was released after being treated.