Well, I suppose it's kind of nice to know that we'll always have that particular dead horse to beat, at our leisure. And here I thought there was actual hope for them when they started doing character designs that actual humans might wear. Oh well.
Proof that puritanism is still a thing. Perspective check, not everyone thinks pictures of a naked (or scantily dressed) human body is porn. Because sometimes it's not.Revolutionaryloser said:Cool story. Nobody is stopping anybody from going to watch porn, if that's what they want. I have a right to criticize what I want as much as anybody else. If my opinion is now suddenly going to stop bad games from being released, then I'd rather horrible developers like these went out of business and developers who actually had some talent and taste got to make games.Tenmar said:-Snip-
My Gawd... The possibilities...Dexter111 said:But dude, everyone knows that the main demographic of games nowadays are enraged feminists and predominantly failed journalists or developers instead writing about games with feminist tendencies.ScruffyMcBalls said:This dude deserves all the praise we can throw at him. You know how long I've been waiting for someone in the industry to finally recognise that the core fans come first long before anything else when creating a game? Because I've forgotten... But I do know it's been a while.
What almost everyone seems to regularly miss, and has done so again this time, is that you don't have to like the product in question. No seriously, hear me out. So you don't like DOA because it has tits. Big whoop. You know who cares about that? You. That's pretty much it. Do the developers care? No. Wanna know why? Because in this case they're paying attention to the most important party, the fanbase. You know, the people who give them the money to stay in business. So long as they make the product those fans want the opinions of people who don't buy the game and have no influence over the game are irrelevant.
So, you might counter this argument with "But it mires public opinion of gamers!" to which I will answer, so does the entire fighting genre. So does the entire RPG genre, so does the entire shooting genre for that matter. In fact, gaming mires the public perception of gamers. Being a gamer will continue to be considered fringe, probably for the rest of time, so just get used to it.
Is it sexist? Possibly, depends on your stance. Personally I find the in-game characters slightly unrealistic, but asides that it's just kinda there, I play the games for the fighting. There will come a point at which boobs are made so large they might actually impact on gameplay and we may be at that point, I don't think we have, but who knows? Regardless it is what the fanbase wants apparently. Now, what does my argument boil down to? Get the fuck over it. There's more important shit to be worrying about and there's more offensive shit to be offended by, just be happy there are people out there willing to listen to their fans before they listen to executives and people complaining at the front gate who had no intention of buying or playing the product in the first place. And as a side note, try not to make blanket assumptions about a fanbase. The game has several attractions, much like most games. In this case breasts are just one of them, strive to bare that in mind.
(Yes I do consider myself a bit of a fan of the franchise, yes I am bitter at being lumped in with assumed the "Dem sexist man-children who like big boobies cause they don't have a girlfriend" demographic)
Rant has now concluded.
If they show less skin and decrease the size of the breasts every feminist on earth will buy this game instead! Think of all the profit!
I almost completely agree with you, to a point. But I do want to add one thing to the debate. While yes, a vast number of people play video games, that doesn't actually qualify them as "gamers". At the risk of coming across as elitest (and trust me, that's the last thing I want to be) it's only a minority of people who play games who are actually gamers. Any asshole can pick up a controller and play a game, but that doesn't mean they're involved in the gaming community, that doesn't mean they have a vested interest in the industry and it doesn't mean they are a gamer. You put it best when you called gaming a "hobby", and while gaming is a hobby for me, my uncle who plays a couple rounds of deathmatch of an evening would call gaming a "pass-time" something he picks up once in a while. I'd be tempted to believe the majority of new "gamers" are the same. Now at this point it's all semantics, and either one of us could be wrong. I hope you're right in the long run, but who knows?Krantos said:This is the only part of your rant I have a problem with. Well, problem is probably too strong a word. I just don't think that prediction can be justified.ScruffyMcBalls said:Being a gamer will continue to be considered fringe, probably for the rest of time
Gaming has become too widespread. It's almost as ubiquitous as watching television anymore. The time will come, probably pretty soon, where it's just accepted. Fox News will probably continue to bang on about it for a few years afterwards, but that'll likely be it.
As gaming becomes more and more commonplace, people will just accept it. It won't be a conscious thing, but it will happen. After all, how can you continue to marginalize a group that is actually a majority.
A common counter-example people often bring up is comics. Comics (in their current form) have been around since the early 20th century, but have never seen widespread acceptance. Why do I think gaming will be different? Simply because comics were never as widely popular as gaming is now. I've seen a statistic that 90% of males age 15-25 (in America) play video games regularly. While I don't know if that particular statistic is true, I think it's pretty close to the mark.
With that many people playing games, gaming as a hobby will eventually just become normal, like watching TV. It won't be a conscious thing, it will just happen. It will be absorbed into normative society.
I know some gamers like to think of themselves as outsiders, but that's increasingly becoming less and less true. They may still be outsiders, but it's no longer because of gaming.
You might want to edit your links, dude. You're linking to an entire playlist, not the one videos you're referring to.Revolutionaryloser said:Just look at these two intros.
See? Style. Pacing, clever composition, risqué shots, cute shots, a bit of characterization, elegance even. That actually got an emotional reaction at the time. It made me feel happy and it made me want to go to the beach and play volleyball.
Skip a to a few years later...
What the fuck Team Ninja!? What the fuck? I feel disgusting.
Ah, the infamous "Matrix Boobs" scene >_>Devoneaux said:I lost it when the bullet passed between her free jiggling breasts.Nalgas D. Lemur said:They should take notes from this. I don't think it's possible to top it for sheer absurdity in either size or jiggliness. People have done extended analyses of it trying to work out the physics involved and come to all sorts of crazy conclusions.Dexter111 said:They've got it all wrong, it's not the size that matters but the quality of the jiggle physics. They need to innovate in that space instead.
Also this made me laugh.CardinalPiggles said:People ask them to make the characters boobs bigger just to see if they do it, and how big they make them. It's more like they are challenging them to be obscene.
Amen to that, there's enough of that in Soul Calibur anyway - no need to oversaturize the market. Cool videos RL.Revolutionaryloser said:Cool story. Nobody is stopping anybody from going to watch porn, if that's what they want. I have a right to criticize what I want as much as anybody else. If my opinion is now suddenly going to stop bad games from being released, then I'd rather horrible developers like these went out of business and developers who actually had some talent and taste got to make games.Tenmar said:-Snip-