Most competent conservative and most liberal game journalists talk about...wait for it....games! I assume conservatives also talk about how intersectionals (not all liberals, just that segment of us) don't talk about games but bring irrelevant things into gaming.undeadsuitor said:I think the idea is that active liberal journalists are more prominent becahse they actually have ideas and say things. They provide an additional level of discussion atop the usual industry bought review scores.Dreiko said:Addendum_Forthcoming said:Gergar12 said:Because the video game industry has lots of liberal media commenters duh.
$2,000 and it can be yours.
While it's hard to do a headcount and figure out who is and isn't liberal, and while liberals are not the issue but rather interesctionals, there is indeed an overabundance of prominent intersectional games journalists and that is pretty much undeniable and the issue at hand, since those journalists are activists first and foremost and are using gaming to further their activism. Prime example is sites like kotaku and polygon but most of all eurogamer who literally twitted out that they wouldn't stop being political activists and stick to games lol.
What exactly do conservative game journalists talk about?
That you don't notice them talk about "something" is a good thing! It's the ideal to be striven for here. Games journalists should talk about games and their message if they even have to have one should be one for the betterment of games and not for the betterment of society which will trickle down to games too somehow in the future supposedly.