I have been a fan of Deadpool since his first miniseries and am possibly one of the only fans of the comics who actually enjoyed Deadpool in Wolverine - Origins.
Ok so when they first announced that Deadpool was going to be in Wolverine Origins I was ecstatic. When I however thought about it I came to the conclusion that Deadpool as we know him couldn?t be in the Wolverine movie. He would steal the whole movie.
This leaves two options:
#1 - Wade Wilson features in Wolverine but doesn?t become Deadpool
#2 - Deadpool?s character is altered somehow.
You may think that what they did to Deadpool was wrong but I enjoyed it. The only way to shut up Deadpool was to take away his entire mouth ... brilliant. You know they?ve taken away Deadpool?s voice before in the comics during the ?Nuff Said Month - They had to kill him to do it but nonetheless it has been done before.
And then the fight scene - The way he moved and fought was pure Deadpool. I loved the nice touch of the stolen Cyclops beam burning the eye patches around his eyes.
Some people have complained about him not using guns but his swords have always been his favourite weapon. Heck he even tries talking about his swords the first time he flirts with Terry.
I?d also like to point out that the time period in the Wolverine film (during Weapon X but before Deadpool gets rejected from the program) has never been depicted in the comics. Sure they?ve mentioned it but they never describe the exact circumstances that lead to his being rejected. Movies deviate from their printed origins all the time and it won?t take much to steer Deadpool back to the comic?s storylines.
It would be easy to include the fact that he volunteered for the experiments because of cancer and it would be just as easy to have his healing factor reject all of his other powers, possibly in a violent and messy way. This could be the very act that gets him rejected within movie canon. He is then dropped into the workshop and viola we?re right there where we need to be to tie into the comic story.
This doesn't even need to be shown in the movie. Technically the Edward Norton Hulk isn't a reboot of the Eric Banna Hulk. They simply never mention anything that happened in the Eric Hulk movie. This means that people who actually enjoyed Eric Hulk can treat Edward Hulk as a direct sequel.
Less focus needs to be placed on making sure this is a reboot than on making sure that this is the Deadpool movie that all the fans have been waiting for.
Ok so when they first announced that Deadpool was going to be in Wolverine Origins I was ecstatic. When I however thought about it I came to the conclusion that Deadpool as we know him couldn?t be in the Wolverine movie. He would steal the whole movie.
This leaves two options:
#1 - Wade Wilson features in Wolverine but doesn?t become Deadpool
#2 - Deadpool?s character is altered somehow.
You may think that what they did to Deadpool was wrong but I enjoyed it. The only way to shut up Deadpool was to take away his entire mouth ... brilliant. You know they?ve taken away Deadpool?s voice before in the comics during the ?Nuff Said Month - They had to kill him to do it but nonetheless it has been done before.
And then the fight scene - The way he moved and fought was pure Deadpool. I loved the nice touch of the stolen Cyclops beam burning the eye patches around his eyes.
Some people have complained about him not using guns but his swords have always been his favourite weapon. Heck he even tries talking about his swords the first time he flirts with Terry.
I?d also like to point out that the time period in the Wolverine film (during Weapon X but before Deadpool gets rejected from the program) has never been depicted in the comics. Sure they?ve mentioned it but they never describe the exact circumstances that lead to his being rejected. Movies deviate from their printed origins all the time and it won?t take much to steer Deadpool back to the comic?s storylines.
It would be easy to include the fact that he volunteered for the experiments because of cancer and it would be just as easy to have his healing factor reject all of his other powers, possibly in a violent and messy way. This could be the very act that gets him rejected within movie canon. He is then dropped into the workshop and viola we?re right there where we need to be to tie into the comic story.
This doesn't even need to be shown in the movie. Technically the Edward Norton Hulk isn't a reboot of the Eric Banna Hulk. They simply never mention anything that happened in the Eric Hulk movie. This means that people who actually enjoyed Eric Hulk can treat Edward Hulk as a direct sequel.
Less focus needs to be placed on making sure this is a reboot than on making sure that this is the Deadpool movie that all the fans have been waiting for.
