"Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again."DioWallachia said:Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again. Sort of in the same way that everyone knows that Citizen Kane its the best movie ever even if it flopped at the box office, only by having the critics claiming over and over over the years people actually gave 2 fucks about it once again.Woodsey said:No, because game stories very, very rarely surpass films or novels (that are highly lauded).
Also: still cringing at the Liara comment.
Let me put it this way. You know what are books best sellers right now? Twilight and Scientology books. The Scientology ones are bought by the ones that made the book to reach the best seller point and reach a more wide audience by tricking them. More or less i believe that using a critic opinion (even from ones that dont exist like this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Manning_%28fictitious_writer%29)its the same tactic.Woodsey said:"Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again."DioWallachia said:Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again. Sort of in the same way that everyone knows that Citizen Kane its the best movie ever even if it flopped at the box office, only by having the critics claiming over and over over the years people actually gave 2 fucks about it once again.Woodsey said:No, because game stories very, very rarely surpass films or novels (that are highly lauded).
Also: still cringing at the Liara comment.
Uh... lol?
Anyway, you're missing the point. Game writing just isn't good for the most part - even top sellers that we praise for their writing aren't particularly exceptional outside of the medium.
Most of the games here happens to be ones that dont have a very good story-gameplay integration and others are multiplayer heavy experiences (especially Minecraft who under my eyes feels like a MMORPG) Never played Neverwinter Nights or Dawn of War though.Scabadus said:I can certainly try:DioWallachia said:Could you give a total list of ALL the games he played? preferably in order.Scabadus said:*snip*
Ocarina of Time
Various Grand Theft Autos - from Vice City, up to 4, back down to buying 3 on his iPhone a few months ago
A football (that's soccer if you're American) game on the PS1, loved by my family because one of the combo buttons was to full-on boot your opponent in the face
Crazy Taxi on our old PS2 (this one, now I think about it, he could play for hours)
House of the Dead III (again, our home copy, we don't go to arcades much. I did have the lightguns though!)
Halo 1 & 2 (both co-op playing through the full campaign, along with many hours of splitscreen/networked multipayer, no online)
Sim City 3000 (we managed to play this against each other: start at one date, you have until another date to make as much money as possible. It's really fun!)
Counter-Strike: Source (for about an hour, offline, VS me. I think he got one kill... we have rather different natural skill levels)
Command and Conquer: Generals - Zero Hour
Dawn Of War: Dark Crusade, replaced by Soulstorm when it was released
Guitar Hero (or at least that type of game)
Neverwinter Nights 1 (again playing co-operativly with me, he enjoyed it but we never completed it - I was home for the holidays - and he never played it solo when I left)
Minecraft
That's all I can remember... I'm sure there are more and the order may not be perfect, but the importent ones are in there and it's mostly chronological.
Accessibility to games is completely irrelevant to my point. The best of the best writing in games rarely matches that of films and books (often not matching those which we'd simply consider just plain good).DioWallachia said:Let me put it this way. You know what are books best sellers right now? Twilight and Scientology books. The Scientology ones are bought by the ones that made the book to reach the best seller point and reach a more wide audience by tricking them. More or less i believe that using a critic opinion (even from ones that dont exist like this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Manning_%28fictitious_writer%29)its the same tactic.Woodsey said:"Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again."DioWallachia said:Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again. Sort of in the same way that everyone knows that Citizen Kane its the best movie ever even if it flopped at the box office, only by having the critics claiming over and over over the years people actually gave 2 fucks about it once again.Woodsey said:No, because game stories very, very rarely surpass films or novels (that are highly lauded).
Also: still cringing at the Liara comment.
Uh... lol?
Anyway, you're missing the point. Game writing just isn't good for the most part - even top sellers that we praise for their writing aren't particularly exceptional outside of the medium.
And if game writing isnt heard outside the medium its because, from a technical standpoint, they arent mainstream yet. Confusing? well here is a bastardized version of this article:
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/issues/issue_266/7959-We-Are-Not-Mainstream
Tickets to see a movie are cheap and more accessible, playing a video game however requieres the console and the game, and each game (at least the so called AAA titles) cost at least 60$. Its obvious to see why no one knows about game writing when its this unreachable.
On the bright side, at least they weren't subjected to the new shit in ACR.TrilbyWill said:A little, because they always have a 'wtf' face when me and my gamer friends start talking. I mean, when three quarters of your friend group are looking at you like "Words come from your mouth but they make no sense to me!" because you're talking about the new shit in AC:R, you gotta feel bad because they're being excluded, and that's kinda shitty.
Or maybe it already exist but because the hardware is no longer produced to sustain things that according to video game producers dont make a profit it was lost in time. I mean, i know that filmaking started around 1895 but 80% films from that point to say 1943 (the year Citizen Kane was made) were lost forever. Same for videogames except that even with all the things that were against the film industry you can still get The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari (1920 and technically belong to public domain) on a bloody DVD but good luck find a game and a console that works (not including emulation that its technically illegal)Kahunaburger said:@Dio: so you're saying that because many people have terrible taste in books literature is a bad medium?
And yeah, woodsey is right about the quality of writing in games IMO - although there are many very well-written games out there, we haven't had a gaming Odyssey yet. This is because the medium is still very young and people are just figuring out what can be done with it.
If it is not well know that a good game exist then its obvious that people will say that there arent any. If only commercials of COD and MW3 are available on the TV then obviously people will believe that games are about violence and nothing else.Woodsey said:Accessibility to games is completely irrelevant to my point. The best of the best writing in games rarely matches that of films and books (often not matching those which we'd simply consider just plain good).
I don't really get the confusion.
The argument is my opinion, I'm not taking it from anyone else. The OP said he feels sorry for them because they're missing out on loads of great stories, I said I don't feel sorry for them because they're not missing out on that many great stories.DioWallachia said:If it is not well know that a good game exist then its obvious that people will say that there arent any. If only commercials of COD and MW3 are available on the TV then obviously people will believe that games are about violence and nothing else.Woodsey said:Accessibility to games is completely irrelevant to my point. The best of the best writing in games rarely matches that of films and books (often not matching those which we'd simply consider just plain good).
I don't really get the confusion.
Its about perception and more on the fact that no one has the balls to actually do a research about it
Not saying that you did so but one can fall into the trap of "If i didnt heard about it then it doesnt exist"Woodsey said:The argument is my opinion, I'm not taking it from anyone else.DioWallachia said:If it is not well know that a good game exist then its obvious that people will say that there arent any. If only commercials of COD and MW3 are available on the TV then obviously people will believe that games are about violence and nothing else.Woodsey said:Accessibility to games is completely irrelevant to my point. The best of the best writing in games rarely matches that of films and books (often not matching those which we'd simply consider just plain good).
I don't really get the confusion.
Its about perception and more on the fact that no one has the balls to actually do a research about it
I think calling it a relationship makes you sound like a love-pillow sniffing weirdo.PureAussieGamer said:I have a lot of non gamer friends and i sometimes try to explain to them how emotionally invested in games people can get. I have tried to explain that i have been in a 4 year relationship with Liara from the Mass Effect series. I feel bad for them because they are missing out on some of the greatest stories told because they don't get to play games like Skyrim, Uncharted, Mass Effect and Metal Gear Solid to just name a few.
Let me know what you think.
Pretty sure I see what you did there.DioWallachia said:Hm.... sorry, i.....had a trouble with the fireplace and i dont know what overtook me when i wrote that up there.
I don't think early gaming is sitting on an Odyssey that we somehow haven't heard of. (That said, I'm not even convinced that literary fiction has an Odyssey.) There are excellent writing and/or stories in games -- I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream, Shade, Planescape:Torment, stuff by Tim Schafer, and so on. But in terms of writing, these tend to be on par with good books or short stories, not classics to outlast civilizations.DioWallachia said:Or maybe it already exist but because the hardware is no longer produced to sustain things that according to video game producers dont make a profit it was lost in time. I mean, i know that filmaking started around 1895 but 80% films from that point to say 1943 (the year Citizen Kane was made) were lost forever. Same for videogames except that even with all the things that were against the film industry you can still get The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari (1920 and technically belong to public domain) on a bloody DVD but good luck find a game and a console that works (not including emulation that its technically illegal)Kahunaburger said:@Dio: so you're saying that because many people have terrible taste in books literature is a bad medium?
And yeah, woodsey is right about the quality of writing in games IMO - although there are many very well-written games out there, we haven't had a gaming Odyssey yet. This is because the medium is still very young and people are just figuring out what can be done with it.
Then we will be dead by the time that happens even with the Internet at large, dont you said? Or maybe those classics outlasted civilizations because it was the only thing around to read and making good stories makes blood come out of people's nose, so its not surpricing that they were good because people didnt know any better.Kahunaburger said:I don't think early gaming is sitting on an Odyssey that we somehow haven't heard of. (That said, I'm not even convinced that literary fiction has an Odyssey.) There are excellent writing and/or stories in games -- I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream, Shade, Planescape:Torment, stuff by Tim Schafer, and so on. But in terms of writing, these tend to be on par with good books or short stories, not classics to outlast civilizations.DioWallachia said:Or maybe it already exist but because the hardware is no longer produced to sustain things that according to video game producers dont make a profit it was lost in time. I mean, i know that filmaking started around 1895 but 80% films from that point to say 1943 (the year Citizen Kane was made) were lost forever. Same for videogames except that even with all the things that were against the film industry you can still get The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari (1920 and technically belong to public domain) on a bloody DVD but good luck find a game and a console that works (not including emulation that its technically illegal)Kahunaburger said:@Dio: so you're saying that because many people have terrible taste in books literature is a bad medium?
And yeah, woodsey is right about the quality of writing in games IMO - although there are many very well-written games out there, we haven't had a gaming Odyssey yet. This is because the medium is still very young and people are just figuring out what can be done with it.
I was just listing a bunch of games i had recently played. I didnt put much thought into what games have the best story. First it was late at night and second thats not what the thread is about.Anoni Mus said:LOL. I hope you mean stories told in games, overall? You must be crazy then.PureAussieGamer said:I have a lot of non gamer friends and i sometimes try to explain to them how emotionally invested in games people can get. I have tried to explain that i have been in a 4 year relationship with Liara from the Mass Effect series. I feel bad for them because they are missing out on some of the greatest stories told because they don't get to play games like Skyrim, Uncharted, Mass Effect and Metal Gear Solid to just name a few.
Let me know what you think.
And if you feel sorry for non gamers, do you feel sorry for gamers who dislike that specific games?