Do you feel sorry for non gamers?

Recommended Videos

Philol

New member
Nov 7, 2011
595
0
0
Not really, if they don't play games that's fine, I wouldn't except a non-gamer to feel sorry for me for playing games.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
DioWallachia said:
Woodsey said:
No, because game stories very, very rarely surpass films or novels (that are highly lauded).

Also: still cringing at the Liara comment.
Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again. Sort of in the same way that everyone knows that Citizen Kane its the best movie ever even if it flopped at the box office, only by having the critics claiming over and over over the years people actually gave 2 fucks about it once again.
"Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again."

Uh... lol?

Anyway, you're missing the point. Game writing just isn't good for the most part - even top sellers that we praise for their writing aren't particularly exceptional outside of the medium.
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,087
0
0
No, not everyone can be absorbed in the world of gaming, just like I don't like sports. I can have fun playing and sometimes in the right crowd I can even have some fun watching it, however I don't usually like it.
I am missing out on a lot of the good things about sport for not liking it though. I don't get to share the community and the entertainment they like, but hey, I like games. I already got my entertainment. I already got my community. Why would I care that there are people out there watching a guy run over the field while kicking a ball? Why would they care that I like playing Xenoblade?
 

DioWallachia

New member
Sep 9, 2011
1,546
0
0
Woodsey said:
DioWallachia said:
Woodsey said:
No, because game stories very, very rarely surpass films or novels (that are highly lauded).

Also: still cringing at the Liara comment.
Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again. Sort of in the same way that everyone knows that Citizen Kane its the best movie ever even if it flopped at the box office, only by having the critics claiming over and over over the years people actually gave 2 fucks about it once again.
"Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again."

Uh... lol?

Anyway, you're missing the point. Game writing just isn't good for the most part - even top sellers that we praise for their writing aren't particularly exceptional outside of the medium.
Let me put it this way. You know what are books best sellers right now? Twilight and Scientology books. The Scientology ones are bought by the ones that made the book to reach the best seller point and reach a more wide audience by tricking them. More or less i believe that using a critic opinion (even from ones that dont exist like this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Manning_%28fictitious_writer%29)its the same tactic.

And if game writing isnt heard outside the medium its because, from a technical standpoint, they arent mainstream yet. Confusing? well here is a bastardized version of this article:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/issues/issue_266/7959-We-Are-Not-Mainstream

Tickets to see a movie are cheap and more accessible, playing a video game however requieres the console and the game, and each game (at least the so called AAA titles) cost at least 60$. Its obvious to see why no one knows about game writing when its this unreachable.
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
@Dio: so you're saying that because many people have terrible taste in books literature is a bad medium?

And yeah, woodsey is right about the quality of writing in games IMO - although there are many very well-written games out there, we haven't had a gaming Odyssey yet. This is because the medium is still very young and people are just figuring out what can be done with it.
 

DioWallachia

New member
Sep 9, 2011
1,546
0
0
Scabadus said:
DioWallachia said:
Scabadus said:
Could you give a total list of ALL the games he played? preferably in order.
I can certainly try:

Ocarina of Time
Various Grand Theft Autos - from Vice City, up to 4, back down to buying 3 on his iPhone a few months ago
A football (that's soccer if you're American) game on the PS1, loved by my family because one of the combo buttons was to full-on boot your opponent in the face
Crazy Taxi on our old PS2 (this one, now I think about it, he could play for hours)
House of the Dead III (again, our home copy, we don't go to arcades much. I did have the lightguns though! :D)
Halo 1 & 2 (both co-op playing through the full campaign, along with many hours of splitscreen/networked multipayer, no online)
Sim City 3000 (we managed to play this against each other: start at one date, you have until another date to make as much money as possible. It's really fun!)
Counter-Strike: Source (for about an hour, offline, VS me. I think he got one kill... we have rather different natural skill levels)
Command and Conquer: Generals - Zero Hour
Dawn Of War: Dark Crusade, replaced by Soulstorm when it was released
Guitar Hero (or at least that type of game)
Neverwinter Nights 1 (again playing co-operativly with me, he enjoyed it but we never completed it - I was home for the holidays - and he never played it solo when I left)
Minecraft

That's all I can remember... I'm sure there are more and the order may not be perfect, but the importent ones are in there and it's mostly chronological.
Most of the games here happens to be ones that dont have a very good story-gameplay integration and others are multiplayer heavy experiences (especially Minecraft who under my eyes feels like a MMORPG) Never played Neverwinter Nights or Dawn of War though.

I could recommend him to play The Legacy of Kain and Bastion for very STRONG story driven game or Alien Soldier for Sega Genesis and Tyrian for the PC for intense arcade action.

The Legacy of Kain (PC,PS1,PS2) has the problem of being so strong in the writing that you are gonna need to start from the first game to understand what in the heck is going on and 2 games are on the Playstation 1 and 3 on the PS2. One of the reason that games today do the "Same but different approach of James Bond or Indiana Jones" is because of this, having the necessary hardware to appreciate an entire series is a pain in the ass and doesn't guarantee a success on the selling point.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
DioWallachia said:
Woodsey said:
DioWallachia said:
Woodsey said:
No, because game stories very, very rarely surpass films or novels (that are highly lauded).

Also: still cringing at the Liara comment.
Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again. Sort of in the same way that everyone knows that Citizen Kane its the best movie ever even if it flopped at the box office, only by having the critics claiming over and over over the years people actually gave 2 fucks about it once again.
"Maybe they are highly lauded because they believe its the only way people will actually care about books again."

Uh... lol?

Anyway, you're missing the point. Game writing just isn't good for the most part - even top sellers that we praise for their writing aren't particularly exceptional outside of the medium.
Let me put it this way. You know what are books best sellers right now? Twilight and Scientology books. The Scientology ones are bought by the ones that made the book to reach the best seller point and reach a more wide audience by tricking them. More or less i believe that using a critic opinion (even from ones that dont exist like this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Manning_%28fictitious_writer%29)its the same tactic.

And if game writing isnt heard outside the medium its because, from a technical standpoint, they arent mainstream yet. Confusing? well here is a bastardized version of this article:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/issues/issue_266/7959-We-Are-Not-Mainstream

Tickets to see a movie are cheap and more accessible, playing a video game however requieres the console and the game, and each game (at least the so called AAA titles) cost at least 60$. Its obvious to see why no one knows about game writing when its this unreachable.
Accessibility to games is completely irrelevant to my point. The best of the best writing in games rarely matches that of films and books (often not matching those which we'd simply consider just plain good).

I don't really get the confusion.

TrilbyWill said:
A little, because they always have a 'wtf' face when me and my gamer friends start talking. I mean, when three quarters of your friend group are looking at you like "Words come from your mouth but they make no sense to me!" because you're talking about the new shit in AC:R, you gotta feel bad because they're being excluded, and that's kinda shitty.
On the bright side, at least they weren't subjected to the new shit in ACR.
 

DioWallachia

New member
Sep 9, 2011
1,546
0
0
Kahunaburger said:
@Dio: so you're saying that because many people have terrible taste in books literature is a bad medium?

And yeah, woodsey is right about the quality of writing in games IMO - although there are many very well-written games out there, we haven't had a gaming Odyssey yet. This is because the medium is still very young and people are just figuring out what can be done with it.
Or maybe it already exist but because the hardware is no longer produced to sustain things that according to video game producers dont make a profit it was lost in time. I mean, i know that filmaking started around 1895 but 80% films from that point to say 1943 (the year Citizen Kane was made) were lost forever. Same for videogames except that even with all the things that were against the film industry you can still get The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari (1920 and technically belong to public domain) on a bloody DVD but good luck find a game and a console that works (not including emulation that its technically illegal)
 

DioWallachia

New member
Sep 9, 2011
1,546
0
0
Woodsey said:
Accessibility to games is completely irrelevant to my point. The best of the best writing in games rarely matches that of films and books (often not matching those which we'd simply consider just plain good).

I don't really get the confusion.
If it is not well know that a good game exist then its obvious that people will say that there arent any. If only commercials of COD and MW3 are available on the TV then obviously people will believe that games are about violence and nothing else.

Its about perception and more on the fact that no one has the balls to actually do a research about it
 

Dejawesp

New member
May 5, 2008
431
0
0
Games are just a free time waster like TV. I don't think any amount of "pride" should be attributed to it.

Its certainly not productive and definitely not educational. Its per definition a waste of time. We play them to use up our free time and some people take it too far at that.


Most of the time they should feel sorry for us. I do envy people that do productive stuff on their spare time like manage the garden or work on the car or even workaholics who do what they get paid to do for fun.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
DioWallachia said:
Woodsey said:
Accessibility to games is completely irrelevant to my point. The best of the best writing in games rarely matches that of films and books (often not matching those which we'd simply consider just plain good).

I don't really get the confusion.
If it is not well know that a good game exist then its obvious that people will say that there arent any. If only commercials of COD and MW3 are available on the TV then obviously people will believe that games are about violence and nothing else.

Its about perception and more on the fact that no one has the balls to actually do a research about it
The argument is my opinion, I'm not taking it from anyone else. The OP said he feels sorry for them because they're missing out on loads of great stories, I said I don't feel sorry for them because they're not missing out on that many great stories.
 

CrimsonBlaze

New member
Aug 29, 2011
2,252
0
0
I don't feel bad for anyone who is not invested/interested in video games as much as I would feel bad for people who is not invested/interested in sports. To everyone, there is a form of entertainment that they enjoy and if they feel like others should hop on your personal bandwagon it should be because you believe that they would enjoy it as well.

If they don't, it's cool; just let them know that it will always be there waiting for them, if at some point in the future they feel a little curious and want to check it out.
 

DioWallachia

New member
Sep 9, 2011
1,546
0
0
Woodsey said:
DioWallachia said:
Woodsey said:
Accessibility to games is completely irrelevant to my point. The best of the best writing in games rarely matches that of films and books (often not matching those which we'd simply consider just plain good).

I don't really get the confusion.
If it is not well know that a good game exist then its obvious that people will say that there arent any. If only commercials of COD and MW3 are available on the TV then obviously people will believe that games are about violence and nothing else.

Its about perception and more on the fact that no one has the balls to actually do a research about it
The argument is my opinion, I'm not taking it from anyone else.
Not saying that you did so but one can fall into the trap of "If i didnt heard about it then it doesnt exist"

I am pretty much a believer that if the shitty story is the more is know about it in the wide world (Twilight, Transformers, The Legend of Rah and the Muggles, Mission Earth by L. Ron Hubbard, Noir by K.W. Jeter)

And the best story ever is the one that almost not a single soul could possibly have read/seen/played it (The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari)

Well world is fucked up like that.
 

Archer666

New member
May 27, 2011
166
0
0
Games having the greatest stories ever told? Hardly. Also, telling them how you have a relationship with a video game character doesn't speak too well of you.

Video games are fun and all, but there are other hobbies out there that people enjoy too. Its like feeling bad for people who don't follow sports.
 

Phasmal

Sailor Jupiter Woman
Jun 10, 2011
3,676
0
0
PureAussieGamer said:
I have a lot of non gamer friends and i sometimes try to explain to them how emotionally invested in games people can get. I have tried to explain that i have been in a 4 year relationship with Liara from the Mass Effect series. I feel bad for them because they are missing out on some of the greatest stories told because they don't get to play games like Skyrim, Uncharted, Mass Effect and Metal Gear Solid to just name a few.

Let me know what you think.
I think calling it a relationship makes you sound like a love-pillow sniffing weirdo.

The only people who I feel sorry for are the ones who dont try gaming because it isn't aimed at them. I have trouble making female friends because we have nothing to talk about, but I'm sure those same people feel sorry for me for being a terrible woman and not loving shoes or whatever.

But I think feeling sorry for people who dont game just leads to elitism, and we don't need any more of that.

DioWallachia said:
Hm.... sorry, i.....had a trouble with the fireplace and i dont know what overtook me when i wrote that up there.
Pretty sure I see what you did there.
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
DioWallachia said:
Kahunaburger said:
@Dio: so you're saying that because many people have terrible taste in books literature is a bad medium?

And yeah, woodsey is right about the quality of writing in games IMO - although there are many very well-written games out there, we haven't had a gaming Odyssey yet. This is because the medium is still very young and people are just figuring out what can be done with it.
Or maybe it already exist but because the hardware is no longer produced to sustain things that according to video game producers dont make a profit it was lost in time. I mean, i know that filmaking started around 1895 but 80% films from that point to say 1943 (the year Citizen Kane was made) were lost forever. Same for videogames except that even with all the things that were against the film industry you can still get The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari (1920 and technically belong to public domain) on a bloody DVD but good luck find a game and a console that works (not including emulation that its technically illegal)
I don't think early gaming is sitting on an Odyssey that we somehow haven't heard of. (That said, I'm not even convinced that literary fiction has an Odyssey.) There are excellent writing and/or stories in games -- I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream, Shade, Planescape:Torment, stuff by Tim Schafer, and so on. But in terms of writing, these tend to be on par with good books or short stories, not classics to outlast civilizations.
 

Smertnik

New member
Apr 5, 2010
1,171
0
0
I'm sorry, what? Why would you "feel sorry" for people not interested in an entertainment medium? We aren't even at the point where video games would provide deep and profound experiences and even then it all comes down to preferences. Just because you enjoy something doesn't mean everybody else has to as well.
 

DioWallachia

New member
Sep 9, 2011
1,546
0
0
Kahunaburger said:
DioWallachia said:
Kahunaburger said:
@Dio: so you're saying that because many people have terrible taste in books literature is a bad medium?

And yeah, woodsey is right about the quality of writing in games IMO - although there are many very well-written games out there, we haven't had a gaming Odyssey yet. This is because the medium is still very young and people are just figuring out what can be done with it.
Or maybe it already exist but because the hardware is no longer produced to sustain things that according to video game producers dont make a profit it was lost in time. I mean, i know that filmaking started around 1895 but 80% films from that point to say 1943 (the year Citizen Kane was made) were lost forever. Same for videogames except that even with all the things that were against the film industry you can still get The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari (1920 and technically belong to public domain) on a bloody DVD but good luck find a game and a console that works (not including emulation that its technically illegal)
I don't think early gaming is sitting on an Odyssey that we somehow haven't heard of. (That said, I'm not even convinced that literary fiction has an Odyssey.) There are excellent writing and/or stories in games -- I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream, Shade, Planescape:Torment, stuff by Tim Schafer, and so on. But in terms of writing, these tend to be on par with good books or short stories, not classics to outlast civilizations.
Then we will be dead by the time that happens even with the Internet at large, dont you said? Or maybe those classics outlasted civilizations because it was the only thing around to read and making good stories makes blood come out of people's nose, so its not surpricing that they were good because people didnt know any better.
 

PureAussieGamer

New member
Feb 9, 2010
334
0
0
Anoni Mus said:
PureAussieGamer said:
I have a lot of non gamer friends and i sometimes try to explain to them how emotionally invested in games people can get. I have tried to explain that i have been in a 4 year relationship with Liara from the Mass Effect series. I feel bad for them because they are missing out on some of the greatest stories told because they don't get to play games like Skyrim, Uncharted, Mass Effect and Metal Gear Solid to just name a few.

Let me know what you think.
LOL. I hope you mean stories told in games, overall? You must be crazy then.

And if you feel sorry for non gamers, do you feel sorry for gamers who dislike that specific games?
I was just listing a bunch of games i had recently played. I didnt put much thought into what games have the best story. First it was late at night and second thats not what the thread is about.
 

Palademon

New member
Mar 20, 2010
4,167
0
0
I only feel sorry for them if they feel they shouldn't play games out of some societal stigma.

For example, one of my acquaintances asked for advice with buying a game for her boyfriend, and I had to ask things such as what genres he likes and what platforms he has, and I had to explain how games made for platforms don't work on others. That was fine, but what really got me was when she reached a point of giving up when she couldn't answer certain questions and burst out with "I don't know, I'm a girl!". She must've forgotten that every other girl in our group plays video games, and I was so focused on trying to argue with that mindset that I forgot too, and couldn't make them all facepalm at her until a few days later.