Sorry if I seemed like a polotition there, I was too focused on pardoning my grammer. I don't think we are in a serious age of gaming, But it is more serious than Duke Nukem will ever be. And look arround, there are a couple shooters diffirent than COD, but I get what you are saying.TheEvilJester said:You avoided my question.MASTACHIEFPWN said:I said "The factor" because that was the one that stunned it from sales. Other than that, It was a good shooter.TheEvilJester said:Not the factor. A factor. Though my question to you is what makes you think that we are in a "serious" age of gaming? It's more like a "Copy Call Of Duty as much as you can" kind of age.MASTACHIEFPWN said:In most cases no, But the factor of why it didn't sell so greatly, is because of it's nature.TheEvilJester said:The hell should I know, doesn't make it any less good though.MASTACHIEFPWN said:No, absolutely not. I am saying if Duke Nukem was as great as how he is glorifying it, why does it appear so far down on the list?TheEvilJester said:I'm sorry, but with the logic you're using and the link you posted, that means The Sims is the absolute best thing ever. And the Sims is closer to Duke than it is to Half-Life.MASTACHIEFPWN said:Grammer Nazi arround here. And yes, I did get my info from videogame post sales charts. And what diffrence does 2 years make? And yes, I understand the game is a parody, but it is an old joke that people think will be a good idea to bring back to life, even though they no it isn't funny anymore. Grow up, man.TEMHOTA said:Oh my the spelling, it hurts my eyes. The trouble is, you don't understand that Duke is parody, you think he is intended to be something more than that, not having played any of them I guess that is understandable, sort of... Anyway I can't explain it to you, hell teachers couldn't even teach you to spell. As a side note making judgments about games you have never played including Duke Nukem 3D and the side scrolling games either, I imagine, makes you the "asshat". What does Half Life have to do with any of this by the way? You know that Duke Nukem 3D was released in 1996 and Half Life in 1998 correct? Who am I kidding, probably not. Also post the sales charts from that time period would make an interesting read, or did you make all that up? Never mind I know the answer... XDMASTACHIEFPWN said:Again, I would steep to your level, but I am not an asshat like you. In my openion, you have no taste if you think a game trying to make everyone as immature as they were 15 will be smiled upon by the rest of media consumers, your the wrong one. How come games like Half Life sold 6 times more than Duke Nukem 3D? Because the game was actually playable on a "I am not a troll/kid" level.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_PC_video_games#cite_note-valve-8
To retaliate my expect comback of you, both half life and duke nukem have sorces of where the information was recived from.