Azaraxzealot said:
minecraft is not a genre.
You sir, just lost your whole arguement towards me when you said this.
If Minecraft was a sort of genre, then I would care less that fortresscraft was being created. I watched a portion of the video, and lost interest when the guy became condescending. As you are with this post.
Minecraft ISN'T a genre though, it's a game that someone quit their job to create and such. Maybe, if the game wasn't a carbon copy with a few different details, and had a name that WASN'T reminiscent of Minecraft, then sure, but what they are doing is basically taking someone elses game, slapping a similar label to confuse people on it, and calling it their own. I'm not saying its a huge deal, as likely the people who will buy fortresscraft don't play games on a PC, but that doesn't make it any better, even if it only effects, lets say 100 sales.
Legally, whatever, but personally, I feel fortresscraft is more or less stealing, and is the start of a soon-to-come strip mining of the game's whole basis. This will lead to Notch's possibly million-dollar-money-maker becoming a simple game that won't be worth keeping updated. Its been done a million times in the past and is bound to happen again if people DON'T retaliate. If you want to play fortresscraft, fine, but don't complain when in a few years there's about 5, 6 different versions by different companies of the same game.
The difference between minecraft and its predecesor that it was based on, is that minecraft is NOT the same game. It uses a basic concept, and expands in a whole new direction.
Right, rage-fest is over now.
EDIT: Besides, Notch was planning to release it on consol after the complete version was made. The reason he didn't start beforehand was because of the scripting not being compatible.