Must be tough making friends. :-/Sir John the Net Knight said:It's my general policy to assume the worst of people until they prove other wise.
And yet, as they say, here you are. I'm not one to say Yahtzee is a perfect critic, nor even a particularly honest one, as he has long entrenched his style of humor in picking the worst parts out of game, and what we are fed as his reviews may not even actually match up with his own experience. We'll never know unless we watch the man, of course, but you always have to activate "grain of salt" when at someone point he says that he was enjoying the game, regardless of the vitriol in the rest of the review.Sir John the Net Knight said:Frankly I've been sick of ZP for quite some time, and what little appreciable humor exists with in is drowned beneath of tidal wave of pointless insults, questionable gaming taste and endless nitpicking.
My "position" is that I agree with Yahtzee about his statement about the "gamer" identity (which I fleshed on in my first post) and that I disagree with your opinion that Yahtzee is, to put your words in short, not worth the time.Sir John the Net Knight said:If you'd like to clarify your position though, I'm willing to hear you out.
My "point", though, is that by default "assuming the worst" about the people you've spoken to, you've made unfair judgments and put yourself at a frankly horrible position in terms of an argument. People don't expect rational or coherent things out of you if you make those kinds of judgments.
If you feel that you need to label me as a Yahtzee bootlicker, then that's your right, I suppose, but it's not going to win you any kind of respect.