Wait, so a missing videogame (replaceable by just about anything when drinks are involved) is responsible for murder when the murderer is DRUNK, has PREVIOUS CRIMINAL RECORDS, and owns both a GUN and AMMO?! Are we sure the media isn't retarded here? Why isn't drinking the focus of this, or better yet, gun control for those with previous criminal records (I don't support gun control normally because criminals are going to violate it no matter what whereas other people who just own the gun and aren't planning to go out and kill with it aren't doing anything wrong)? And going on further into this matter, anyone who decides 4:15 is the right time to have an argument already has problems. Also, looking back over the article again, this guy just gets worse. It took a 3hour standoff with SWAT before he let himself be arrested. Most normal people pull over when a regular police officer turns on their sirens behind them. I can't imagine resist 3 hours against a team of people in full armor who look like modern day ninjas all while obviously sleep deprived. Plus he tried to run away from the scene. This isn't exactly your model citizen, so where do videogames actually enter into this? Oh, the same way that a beer missing from the fridge enters into another drunken idoit shooting someone! You can't just say "Yep, I've seen this before as a rookie. That videogame was the source of all the violence that's taken place here. Well, let's go yank it off the shelves before this happens again in other abusive households." This was the work of a sick man that was years in the making. Not videogames, not guns (I bet he would have found some household object lying around and turned it into a weapon if there wasn't a gun), and probably only partly booze (yes he was drunk, but he was drunk at 4:15!). Media, get over this or I'll start a campaign saying that all the violence we hear on the news is causing violence.
