A flaw with the person isn't a flaw with the idea of gun ownership. A murder is just as liable without the gun. The kid would have been chased down and beaten to death. I'm sure your next comment is about how the kid would have had a better chance. Good for you, the obvious is that a gun is more lethal than fists or a knife. However, you are purposely skipping the fact that the man was too violent to own a gun in the first place and instead using this death as a soap box.Chipperz said:Have you ever tried throwing a knife? Seriously, go and get a knife (anything from a fruit knife to a bread knife, it doesn't matter) now, and try to hit a coke can with the blade from a distance of more than ten foot. Now, get pissed and try it again. If it wasn't for the gun, that kid would be alive now.Credge said:The gun has little to do with it. If the gun hadn't of existed it would have been a knife. If the knife hadn't existed it would have been a fist.
Abusive people are abusive regardless of what weapons they wield.
All I got from that article is that video games have been blamed for poor parenting. And that this guy clearly has a great need for home defence.
Let me quickly correct you on one thing. Even in Texas, there is such a thing as a GUN Law. A gun is actually pretty legally hard to get. I live in Alabama and my boyfriend wanted to buy a pistol, his background info (yes, they check) was solid, but he didn't have good credit and could not purchase a gun.Romicron said:Hard for me to say anything that hasn't already been said.
This is why Canada has firearms laws that require guns and ammunition to be locked up and stored separately. It gives you extra time to think, maybe enough extra time before you realize that you want to kill someone of your own flesh and blood over something as stupid as a video game.
This crime happened because of alcohol and easy access to firearms, nothing more. The son could have done something else that pissed the father off and the crime still would have happened; more likely than not, if there was no alcohol or the firearms were locked up and the ammunition stored separately, along with the guns being locked up, this crime wouldn't have happened.
Of course, this is Texas we're talking about. God forbid ANYONE mentioning laws that restrict firearm use in ANY way.
But they are racist, I mean. You play as humans, who kill other human or human-ish thingies with multiple backgrounds, thoughts and feelings. It's like a, you know, something racist... in a way, like. Racist?VanityGirl said:Wow, this is just another reason people will blame videogames over the deaths of others. I agree that it's indeed bullshit. Why didn't the headlines just say, "Drunken Father kills son over argument"? The press are always looking for a scapegoat, goodness forbid we blame alcohol and a previous criminal record, let us blame video games instead.
And no, it's not unreasonable to be a bit touchy about it. But remember your source, it's the Houston Chronicle, the people with a writer who thinks Left 4 Dead 2 and Call of Juarez are racist.Malygris said:I don't think it's unreasonable to be a bit touchy about it.
See, you had a reasonable post until about here. Despite our 'rampant gun culture' as people who don't know what they're talking about would call it, our gun crime rates our lower than many other obviously 'enlightened' places where people don't know anything about them except that they, of course, are the cause of murder.Malygris said:And as long as stories like this attract follow-up user comments like, "Lends some credence to video games causing violence" - not booze, not socio-economic conditions, not a rampant gun culture...
I generally just think all news is evil. Other than the weather. Thats a necessary evil XDVanityGirl said:I'd like to point out at the Houston Chronicle has it out for gamers, not too long ago, one of their writers accused Left 4 Dead 2, Resi 5 and Call of Jueraz for being racist.
That accusation is full of fail.
So what have we learned about the Houston Chronicle?
Houston Chronicle=pure evil