danpascooch said:
You can't possibly be serious.
What gave it away? The fact that I wrote "ANSWER ME!"? Good, have a biscuit.
So no, I was not serious. I mean, I don't think it's going too far, but I don't think you're a preachy self righteous type either.
ShadowKirby said:
1)That's not "meaning", that's your interpretation of what happened behind the the creation of this mechanic, not a perceived meaning within the narrative or the gameplay.
2)If you don't want to think about stuff, that's your problem buddy. But don't ***** about the fact that I take the higher road and decide to do some critical thinking about the media I consume.
Also, what you call pseudo-intellectual rant and amateur sociology is just some of the basic stuff you learn in media communications and cinema theories classes at university.
1 - Quite correct, and it is, as far as anyone with actual, you know, useful things to do, is concerned, also the only thing worth knowing about the non-issue at hand, and even then it barely registers.
The meaning behind it, I cannot think of. That's probably because there is none.
If I tell a joke, must the joke have a meaning deeper than simply being a joke?
For instance, just yesterday, I was playing Dragon Age Origins.
I was trying to enter the mage tower via boat, and the templar didn't want to let me on.
I had Sten in my party, who happened to have some cookies with him, which he used to bribe the apparently hungry templar.
When asked where he got them, he told me he had taken them from a fat child in a village we had passed, for his own good, "He didn't need any more".
I chuckled.
What is the deeper meaning here? Does this say something about the Qunari, a warrior race who are born into service to their lords, and spend their entire lives in service to these lords, never smiling, never having fun, never doing anything but their duties to their lords until they die?
Is it perhaps an allegory to the fact that no matter how much society tries, we will always try to have some fun, through whatever avenue is available, no matter how opressive a culture we live in?
That, even in a society where individuality is practically forbidden, men will still differ from one another in small ways?
That the human spirit cannot be bound by laws and instructions?
Come to think of it, maybe the Qunari are supposed to be Soviet Russia. GASP!
See what I did there? I applied your motto of critical thinking to something that absolutely did not warrant it.
The stoic man had cookies, and took them from a fat kid.
Ha ha, the stoic man likes cookies.
Ha he, the kid is fat.
There's your goddamn meaning.
2 - I do want to think about stuff. I want to think about important stuff, like my savings account, or who I should vote for, or what to name my child. You know. Important stuff.
But you are, once again I'm afraid, wrong.
You see, you're not supposed to do any critical thinking when playing a Duke Nukem game.
Or watching The Expendables, for that matter, which, I just have to ask, what insights did you glean from that movie that I, not having been awarded the great and prestigious honor of attending a cinema theories class, could not see for myself?
To get back to the point, no.
If you must overthink everything, I will not hold you from it, but you cannot so pompously claim the high road because I refuse to waste my time considering whether or not a man stealing cookies from a fat kid is supposed to mean anything.