EA Wins Title of "Worst Company in America"

lapan

New member
Jan 23, 2009
1,456
1
0
Bank of america was already nominated and in the top 3 of the award multiple times and didn't change anything. That and the fact that it was an internet poll and gamers are an obviously large and vocal part of the internet explain why EA was voted over argueably worse companies.

EA has milked and thrown away many companies that were beloved for their games, it has a horrible customer support and has been hated for many years now fro mtheir employes and customers alike. It isn't worth being defended either.

And as consumerist itself said, it can't hurt to shed some light on the gaming market as it is now. It's becoming more and more damaging to the consumers.
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
Soviet Heavy said:
And of course, EA learns nothing from this, saying "Fuck you, we still make shitloads of cash off our vidya games."
cuz you gamers will still pony up no matter what we do.

sorry thought I would finish off that sentence for you
 

Vibhor

New member
Aug 4, 2010
714
0
0
CaptOfSerenity said:
Goddamnit, Haliburton, Blackwater, any number of Private Military Groups should have gotten this.

EA IS A FUCKING VIDEO GAME COMPANY! You people need to get out of your shells and realize gaming is not the center of the damn world. Neither are gaming companies.
This is a rather weird response to any poll whatsoever.
People have free will and such can vote any company they dislike. There is no such thing as objective opinion so you are just raging because the company of your preference did not win. That is rather unreasonable.

Also, I do not see the relevance of EA being a video game company. On one side of these forums people are arguing that video games are art and the product should not be tampered by consumers and on the other we have people like you saying that video games industry is not important. Bad business practices are stay bad no matter wherever you go. In fact, common consumer would probably not know anything about any PMC for that matter.
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
Wow. That's... shallow, Internet.

I'm really, really unhappy with EA, for a variety of reasons that I won't restate here. Unhappy to the point that, barring a significant sea change, it's quite likely that I'm never going to buy another EA game.

But while EA is bad for its industry, horrible to its customers, and a happy participant in the spearhead that's wresting the right to do anything about corporate malfeasance from consumers and employees alike, it also hasn't cost scores of people their life savings. Or wrongfully tried to foreclose on someone's home. Or cost anyone their lives. (At least, as far as I'm aware.)

At the end of the day, EA is a company that makes video games. I like video games. I'm even willing to seriously consider the possibility that video games can be art (or as somebodyorother once said, "a computer can make you cry.") But I don't live and die by them. If I don't play a video game tomorrow, no one is going to go hungry. The worst a bad video game is ever likely to do to you personally is turn a functioning game system into a brick.

On the other hand... le sigh... If EA can roll its eyes at this, what were the chances this attention would make a BofA or a Halliburton suddenly grow a conscience...?
 

5t3v0

New member
Jan 15, 2011
317
0
0
Wing Dairu said:
I would like to remind everyone that EA's Origin service has AT LEAST ONE CONFIRMED DEATH ON ITS HANDS.
After continuous repeat charges to one Origin user's account, the poor soul's electricity was shut off. Guess what? The guy had someone on life support in his apartment, and as a result of losing power, they died. Because EA overcharged them repeatedly.
Source?
 

Don't taze me bro

New member
Feb 26, 2009
340
0
0
This is only slightly worse than a metacritic bombing in my opinion. I mean, how can the voters seriously vote EA as being worse than companies out there. I'm talking about companies that really do ruin people's lives, or the environment in the name of profit. Sure, EA can be dicks, but the shortsightedness shown here is staggering.
 

blackrave

New member
Mar 7, 2012
2,020
0
0
Talking about exaggeration.
EA isn't THAT bad.
(I'm not protecting them, but there are far worse companies)
 

Black Rabt

New member
Jan 22, 2010
58
0
0
I feel like not enough people are aware of the things that are wrong with Halliburton for them to have won. Plus they are more Cobra from original G.I. Joe than evil corporation like Walmart, like Cobra Industries from the newer G.I. Joe Renegades.
 

Atrocious Joystick

New member
May 5, 2011
293
0
0
What the fuck internet? EA isn't even that bad for a videogame publisher, is it really so horrible that they'll dangle some cheap ass optional dlc and make you use their online store instead of the competion's? I know the escapist is the hipster HQ of the gaming world but they do have several high quality titles and franchises under their "command". Or am I missing something?

All this tells me is that alot of people care more about slight annoyances than downright evil.
 

Grey Day for Elcia

New member
Jan 15, 2012
1,773
0
0
99% of people who voted for EA being the worst company will continue to buy their games.

People like to talk big.

Nothing to see here.
 

Anti Nudist Cupcake

New member
Mar 23, 2010
1,054
0
0
"Traditionally, the Poo has been delivered on its little red pillow," writes the Consumerist. "But this year, we'll give EA three different color options for its pillow, though in the end it's still the same old Poo."

I laughed out loud at this Mass effect 3 ending reference.
 

Timmibal

New member
Nov 8, 2010
253
0
0
In response to the trumps of flatulence sounding about how much worse BoA is than EA, yes, you're right. Want a cookie? You're still missing the point.

This was a web poll on the consumerist. A site where people can *****, moan, and vent about how company xyz pissed them off that day. (I know I'm oversimplifying but hey, pot, kettle...) This is not the goddamn board of the IMF deciding who to blame the global economic downturn on. This is a web poll which 'awards the winner' a gilded lump of shit. This was a poll to let people say 'This company rustled my jimmies and I'm not happy.' This is not a meta-score to decide which skyscraper Tyler Durden will bomb first.

Did you all miss this section of the article? Seems OP did, because it's directly prevelant to (indeed, preceeding and following) her quote, and casts the whole thing in a much different light.

To those who might sneer at something as "non-essential" as a video game company winning the Worst Company In America vote: It's that exact kind of attitude that allows people to ignore the complaints as companies like EA to nickel and dime consumers to death.

For years, while movies and music became more affordable and publishers piled on bonus content ? or multiple modes of delivery ? as added value to entice customers to buy, video games have continued to be priced like premium goods.
'So what if EA is directly responsible for the vampirism of wonderful developers and wyrmish hoarding of popular IPs? So what if EA are directly responsible for laying off hundreds of skilled employees and outsourcing QA and entry-level design and programming work overseas, thus further denying new entrants into the industry the opportunity. So what that their staff are forced to work sweatshop hours without benefits due to unrealistic release schedules? THERE ARE PEOPLE LOSING THEIR HOUSES!!!!!oneeleven!!!11' This appeal to worse problems strawman is not an acceptable argument.

Yeah, forget the argument that some of those people are clearly living beyond their means. Forget that there is a legal framework designed to protect people who are the victims of improper foreclosure. Forget that there is an oversight body designed specifically to forward serious complaints about the actions of the banking industry. Clearly a web poll (that they already 'won' 2 years running) is the right way to stop them.

So That aside, BoA is still arguably worse than EA. So what? We've got to meta-vote what few means of expressing our dissatisfaction with a company's behaviour we've got left (that don't result in DING DONG BANNU) just because another company we might not have any dealing with whatsoever is an arguably bigger dick?

Fuck that, I'm going to vote for the company that pissed me off the most. And, and this is important, notice I haven't even ONCE mentioned the game with the Neopolitan ice-cream ending?

To Paraphrase Jim Sterling: You can turn your nose up at people who do this as childish, but at the end of the day, they're the ones who get results. I'm going to go with the ones who get results.
 

lapan

New member
Jan 23, 2009
1,456
1
0
Atrocious Joystick said:
What the fuck internet? EA isn't even that bad for a videogame publisher, is it really so horrible that they'll dangle some cheap ass optional dlc and make you use their online store instead of the competion's? I know the escapist is the hipster HQ of the gaming world but they do have several high quality titles and franchises under their "command". Or am I missing something?

All this tells me is that alot of people care more about slight annoyances than downright evil.
You are forgetting their extremly horrible customer support and employee+customer treatment.
 

PingoBlack

Searching for common sense ...
Aug 6, 2011
322
0
0
EA itself doesn't seem terribly upset about having won The Golden Poo, however. In a statement, EA Senior Director of Corporate Communications John Reseburg told Kotaku that,

"We're sure that British Petroleum, AIG, Philip Morris, and Halliburton are all relieved they weren't nominated this year. We're going to continue making award-winning games and services played by more than 300 million people worldwide."
Haha. Fail.

Trying to deflect poo by screaming other poo smells just as bad? Really, EA PR? You failed in comparison to many corporations, so you list a few more you would also fail against? Including the people that destroyed Gulf of Mexico? :D

I sure hope the supply of BioDrones doesn't dry up ...
 

Von Marlon

New member
Apr 5, 2012
1
0
0
"We're sure that British Petroleum, AIG, Philip Morris, and Halliburton are all relieved they weren't nominated this year. We're going to continue nickle and diming and laying waste to every game/developer we can get our greedy hands on and will carry on doing until the gaming market is completely destroyed ."

Fix'd

Might be foolish thinking but I really hope this is the start of gamers finally realising if we want this this to stop, we need to stop funding EA's evil empire but then to do that we need to stop listening and buying in to all the hype BS they spout which is the only thing they do well.
 

Zack Alklazaris

New member
Oct 6, 2011
1,938
0
0
Soviet Heavy said:
And of course, EA learns nothing from this, saying "Fuck you, we still make shitloads of cash off our vidya games."
They are losing 200 million dollars a quarter.
http://www.vgchartz.com/article/88776/ea-loses-205m-in-the-december-2011-quarter/

They are still A-holes, but yea this whole EA is big and bad should stop. They are not even the largest gaming company. Thats Activision/Blizzard.
 

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,190
0
0
"We're sure that British Petroleum, AIG, Philip Morris, and Halliburton are all relieved they weren't nominated this year. We're going to continue making award-winning games and services played by more than 300 million people worldwide."
That's EA all over. PR bullshit.
 

Druyn

New member
May 6, 2010
554
0
0
Soviet Heavy said:
And of course, EA learns nothing from this, saying "Fuck you, we still make shitloads of cash off our vidya games."
And they're right. Frankly, I would be shocked if this had any kind of impact on their sales in the least. Its going to take something much, much bigger to get them to change their tune.