Editor's Note: DIY

plainlake

New member
Jan 20, 2010
110
0
0
I loved new vegas. But I am from the master race of pc gamers so I fix the bugs myself. And the mods oh god how I love mods.Damn fallout 2 was broken as shit, I remember now. Nice poem-esque article though. Obsidian fail at making the best games. But at least they dont aim too low,unfortunately they just dont have a very steady aim.
 

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
rembrandtqeinstein said:
Poor obsidian. They squandered all the capital they saved up from the Black Isle days. I'm still of the yahtzee school of thought that an ambitious failure is something that is more desirable than a timid, committee-generated success.

And though Kotor 2 didn't have an ending Peragus was the best opening level ever made.
They never HAD any capital, Herve Caen squandered it on Fallout: BOS. Good thing that bastard got bent over the barrel by Bethesda like he did with gamers and Black Isle. The funny part is Herve Caen wrote the policy Bobby Kotick is using now.

OT: Obsidian are good developers. A buggy-but-great game is much better than a timid and safe game. You can fix bugs in a masterpiece, but you can't fix a shitty game.
You can't "fix" something like Kotor2 because there are structural issues. Kotor cut the story off 2/3 of the way in. HK droids? Dark Nihilus explanation? Possible "good" ending for Traya? Actual (multiple) endings? These are way beyond patching.

Maybe the bugs in New Vegas can be fixed but honestly I thought the story was really uninteresting. And even forgetting the bugs the poor design decisions fall squarely in Obsidian's lap.

The whole concept of the vault dweller is that since both you the player and your character are newcomers in the wasteland world. Everything needs to be explained and is a new discovery. The courier is a native and is supposedly well traveled....why isn't my map filled in when I first start? Why am I suddenly gaining levels when I've been doing a relatively dangerous job my whole life? Why am I chasing a guy who shot me when I should be running the hell away from him? Have him kill my family or at least a close relative, that would give me motivation for seeking out revenge.

The location was really a poor choice. You know how a desert looks after a nuclear war? A lot like a desert does BEFORE a nuclear war. The first town was particularly boring, not one character there had any real personality. And the voice acting overall was hideous, the only well written and acted npc was the Deputy Beagle. To be fair I never actually made it into vegas but I did pretty much everything outside.

I understand the whole "post nuclear western" concept but the idea by itself isnt enough to carry a game like Fallout.
 

erbkaiser

Romanorum Imperator
Jun 20, 2009
1,137
0
0
Black Isle made excellent games, mostly bug-free. And got proper patches for those bugs that did exist.
Obsidian apparently sees no need for proper QA testing, and releases buggy, unstable disasters that are hardly playable for many people, then either completely drops all support for the games (blaming their publisher), or only half-heartedly patches them.

I have no doubt that the programmers, writers, developers, and artists at Obsidian are good at what they do, but a passion in making games is not enough by itself. I have no idea how Obsidian manages to remain in business. Do they sign publisher contracts of Pay on Delivery, and is that why they can release games in the piss-poor condition they do?

It seems like Obsidian is a great example of what happens when developers think they no longer need publishers. Based on their horrible track record I conclude that they really NEEDED Interplay to push them. It would be best for everyone if some publisher bought them up and forced them to start supporting their games again.
 

geizr

New member
Oct 9, 2008
850
0
0
So my question is, if their games were so consistently bad and poor quality and there was such mistreatment of the customer, why buy so many? I don't see a point getting mad if one is just going to turn around and continue buying like some drug-addicted junkie. Gamers really need to learn to just vote with their wallets rather than wasting so much energy impotently nerd-raging on the internet. Learn some self-control for once and just don't buy it.
 

JIst00

New member
Nov 11, 2009
597
0
0
I shed a tear while reading that...

...then realised that this is the kind of emorage that you find on the WoW or EvE forums when the dev's break things.

Still, nice to know that professional gaming media editors can emo rage too.

=P
 

Hristo Tzonkov

New member
Apr 5, 2010
422
0
0
erbkaiser said:
Black Isle made excellent games, mostly bug-free. And got proper patches for those bugs that did exist.
Obsidian apparently sees no need for proper QA testing, and releases buggy, unstable disasters that are hardly playable for many people, then either completely drops all support for the games (blaming their publisher), or only half-heartedly patches them.

I have no doubt that the programmers, writers, developers, and artists at Obsidian are good at what they do, but a passion in making games is not enough by itself. I have no idea how Obsidian manages to remain in business. Do they sign publisher contracts of Pay on Delivery, and is that why they can release games in the piss-poor condition they do?

It seems like Obsidian is a great example of what happens when developers think they no longer need publishers. Based on their horrible track record I conclude that they really NEEDED Interplay to push them. It would be best for everyone if some publisher bought them up and forced them to start supporting their games again.
Do you know that all Black Isle games had restoration patches?That recovered hell 1/10th of a game or more and fixed numerous gamebreakers that you previously had to skip.From what I've read about Troika Games,Obsidian,Black Isle they all had a similiar work style.They liked to have long hours for the planning and a very relaxed athmosphere.Hence the great ideas.Then they have to enter a crunch and start working.What all 3 companies complained about was:"We were almost finished ready to test,and then the publisher takes our game from our hands when it's not ready.And they don't ship it right away.It sits waiting for a few months and then gets released.All we could do was twiddle our thumbs and prepare bugfixes."
Which would explain why all Black Isle,Obsidian and Troika Games games had patches on day 1.Obsidian is a great company one with ideas and innovations.They take risks.What are a few bugs that can get patched?
 

erbkaiser

Romanorum Imperator
Jun 20, 2009
1,137
0
0
Hristo Tzonkov said:
Do you know that all Black Isle games had restoration patches?
Yes, I have played most of them when they came out (still have the old big cardboard boxes), and replayed them with the restoration/addon patches starting a few years back.
But no BI game was essentially unplayable with game stopping bugs on release (to my knowledge -- I played Planescape: Torment, both Fallouts, and both Icewind Dales plus expansions) whereas every single Obisidian game so far I've either played or read reviews of does appear to be.

Virtually all games have cut content, that does not mean Obsidian gets a free pass. Their release state of games is horrible, their patching record is atrocious, and they have definitely squandered any good will they earned with their BI track record with me.
In most cases when a publisher swallows up a developer it means bad news (e.g. Maxis/EA or Bioware/EA), but in the case of Obsidian it could only improve things IMO.
 

ironduke88

New member
Mar 20, 2010
129
0
0
In general agreement; however, I gave up after NWNII. I never got to finish the game because it kept breaking, I must have played that starting lizardman dungeon about 10 times and have never got to the end. Sometimes you just get tired of the excuses (Isn't that right Fable fans?).
 

ThisIsSnake

New member
Mar 3, 2011
551
0
0
I'm hoping Bethesda's shiny new engine is more stable >.<

Although I've had crashes and bugs in New Vegas I still enjoy the game.
 

Rack

New member
Jan 18, 2008
1,379
0
0
Obsidian's been nicer to me. I played through the beautiful love letter that is Mask of the Betrayer, I didn't wait all night for her to turn up in Alpha Protocol because I knew she'd just turn up 8 hours late stinking drunk and not remember it. And with New Vegas I'll be there just as soon as she's cleaned the sick off her top.

She's nicer to me, but I'm not a fool, I know her tricks but the good times are worth it.
 

krellen

Unrepentant Obsidian Fanboy
Jan 23, 2009
224
0
0
Obsidian comes down to one simple thing for me: Does story matter?

No one else gives us stories that matter. Only Obsidian. If story matters, then Obsidian is it; everyone else's stories are crap. Even BioWare fails us now.

If story matters, Obsidian's your love.
If you're not here for the story, go on hating Obsidian.
 

Dustpan

New member
Jan 25, 2011
17
0
0
Thank you for venting what I have been feeling since all these large RPG companies started porting games to consoles.

DA:O was the final straw for me. I did not purchase FO3 until all the expansions had been released and there were tonnes of player create mods, which was fantastic. I will need to wait at least another year before I purchase FO:NV.

I am currently playing through BG1 (Tutu) and have BG2, IWD 1&2 and FO 1&2 to go. For me, what makes a great RPG game is purely the story and being able to use imagination to lose yourself in that world. Too much time and money has been spent by these f**king companies, trimming down all the content and making it look good, so that it appeals to the MTV generation with short attention spans.
 

beema

New member
Aug 19, 2009
944
0
0
Sannom said:
I'm still flaggerbast at how out-of-proportions those lay-offs were blown. As if firing 6 people, and mostly interns among them, was the equivalent of firing half the people on the payroll.
people react badly to layoff news?
seems normal to me
 

Soylent Dave

New member
Aug 31, 2010
97
0
0
zelda2fanboy said:
Soylent Dave said:
That's the problem - two or three major bugs in 40 hours isn't considered bad programming?

Are your standards (or expectations) really that low?
Yes. I've never gotten through any modern game without at least one freeze, graphical glitch, or gameplay malfunction. It happens. The fact that the Fallout games let you save and autosave at virtually any spot and an unlimited number of times, it really keeps the bugs from getting out of hand when you encounter them.
Yeah... - only one of the game-breaking errors in New Vegas was that it corrupts (or corrupted; I think they fixed it, but then they might have broken it again - I lose track) your saves and autosaves. And I shouldn't have to double-backup my game saves, it isn't 1990.

But either you're having atrocious luck with games or I'm playing better games than you (... or simpler ones!); I can't say that most modern games I play feature gameplay malfunctions or freezes. The occasional graphical glitch crops up (but even then New Vegas went to a ridiculous extreme with its graphical cockups).

It's also notable that I didn't experience any bugs in Fallout 3 (and I played it a lot), and I've experienced a lot of really irritating ones in 15 hours or so of New Vegas (graphical weirdness and the much more annoying 'oops, you can't finish this quest. Or that one. Or this one.' variety).

I mean, Creative Assembly are kinda notable for releasing games where the AI isn't actually as good as it's meant to be (which is why people usually wait for the patch), but at least their games are still playable; they're just not as good as they should be.

Obsidian really are in a league of their own when it comes to repeatedly releasing unfinished, broken games.

krellen said:
Obsidian comes down to one simple thing for me: Does story matter?

No one else gives us stories that matter. Only Obsidian. If story matters, then Obsidian is it; everyone else's stories are crap. Even BioWare fails us now.

If story matters, Obsidian's your love.
If you're not here for the story, go on hating Obsidian.
Traditionally, though, stories have a beginning a middle and an end.

Not a beginning, most of the middle and oops! deadline, oh well you kinda figured out what the end was going to be; here's a bit of a cutscene - no, wait we didn't finish that either. See you next game folks!

(also, the quality of the story doesn't really matter if the game is too broken to enable me to discover it...)
 

cefm

New member
Mar 26, 2010
380
0
0
All of the reviews on the internet of Fallout: New Vegas should be replaced with this letter ASAP.
 

krellen

Unrepentant Obsidian Fanboy
Jan 23, 2009
224
0
0
Soylent Dave said:
Traditionally, though, stories have a beginning a middle and an end.
What game didn't you get an end for?

KOTOR2? Had an ending.
NWN2? Had an ending, although I'll admit they did make you pay to buy the Mask of the Betrayer campaign.
Alpha Protocol? New Vegas? Multiple endings each.

I'm not sure what ending you think you missed.
 

Soylent Dave

New member
Aug 31, 2010
97
0
0
krellen said:
Soylent Dave said:
Traditionally, though, stories have a beginning a middle and an end.
What game didn't you get an end for?

KOTOR2? Had an ending.
NWN2? Had an ending, although I'll admit they did make you pay to buy the Mask of the Betrayer campaign.
Alpha Protocol? New Vegas? Multiple endings each.

I'm not sure what ending you think you missed.
NWN2 you've covered.

KoTOR 2 didn't have a finished ending - not for the main character, not for the story and not for (most of) your companions; they clearly cobbled something together when they ran out of time.

In my ideal game, my reaction to playing a game to its conclusion wouldn't be "Did I skip something accidentally?" (to the point that I reloaded my last save!)

With New Vegas, I'm having trouble getting to the end of quests (that is, I keep getting quests that are bugged so that I can't finish them) - so I don't know whether the main story ends coherently or not; but I know a lot of the little ones don't (to be fair, that's probably not because they haven't written endings into the game, it's just that their game isn't robust enough to handle things like my going to locations in a slightly different order...)

KoTOR 2 is the one that really annoyed me, because I was actively enjoying the game until the end (and I don't just mean the 'blink and you'll miss it' cut-scene(s); I mean the way the story and characterisation all just falls away as you move towards the end).

Vegas is annoying me on and off at the moment, because the various bugs keep stopping me wanting to play the game (they're not necessarily 'game breaking' because I don't think any of the wonky quests are really important ones (yet), but they are definitely immersion-breaking), so I haven't been able to get into a proper stride with it.