Considering this pretty much happens to blizzard with every single wow expansion and several large patches/events I doubt they have learned anything other then you will never be prepared for the demand.IrateDonnie said:I wonder if Blizzard learned anything from the Diablo3 launch? I'm sure there will be plenty of hilarity over on the Blizzard forums, if it's anything like the D3 launch.Ickabod said:I'm actually getting a bit of entertainment out of this trainwreck. Considering that I spend $60 on the game, it does help offset that expense.
Tune in next week when Starcraft 2 blows up the internet too.
Quite, something is going to have to crash and burn pretty badly if its going to beat either of these two for the title of 'train wreck of the year'. Any other major disasters pending?kburns10 said:What a mess! Looks like Aliens lucked out in that now this has everyone's attention.
That's my thought as well.snekadid said:"Stop telling people about our horribly broken game! It's hard to sweep this under a rug when people keep taking the tour!"
Well. Just about any credible reviewer would sort of hint at this happening before the game was released. Just look at the WTF is Simcity. Half the frikken review is about the drm and some of the caveats that follows in its wake.. <,<Setrus said:That's my thought as well.snekadid said:"Stop telling people about our horribly broken game! It's hard to sweep this under a rug when people keep taking the tour!"
You know, it is a worrying thing I see with these new games having too few servers, first it was Diablo 3 and now it's SimCity...how is one supposed to trust a game featuring online content and DRM to be playable? Reviewers surely don't have to deal with that problem (at least those playing it before the game launches to the common man) so they can't include any problems with that in their review. And if big companies are constantly undercutting their expected (I'm guessing they calculate this, doing otherwise would be foolish) need for servers, how can one trust them to give you a working product?
Nothing can stop the viral marketers anonfelbot said:oh god, then the constant threads on 4chan about the game actually being good may finally stop.
Nah, not gonna happen. The campaign's only connection to the server are the achievements (which definitely will be busted, as they were in WoL's launch), but other than that you don't need to maintain connection to Battlenet to play it.Ickabod said:Tune in next week when Starcraft 2 blows up the internet too.
It depends where the person lives, if their in the US their stuffed, but most other places yes they do because the laws require it.Cecilo said:What refund. EA is refusing any and all refunds.
I don't risk that with EA. They just assume the dev is the problem and shut them down.Lord_Jaroh said:Don't pick up the game at all. If you buy this game, you are part of the problem.WouldYouKindly said:Rule #1 of picking up online multiplayer focused games: DO NOT PICK UP ON LAUNCH DAY!
Actually, I'm kinda waiting to get my new PC though. My laptop can run it, but it'll look like ass so there's that.
Just say no to bullshit DRM.
Actually we broke Ubisoft when Valve decided to let all users who bought From Dust a no questions asked refund based on the DRM policy Ubisoft put in place. Ubisoft learned not because we complained but gave them money anyway, but because we showed them how many people wanted the product (initial sales) but are unwilling to put up with bulshit (amount of refunds within 24hrs.)WouldYouKindly said:I don't risk that with EA. They just assume the dev is the problem and shut them down.Lord_Jaroh said:Don't pick up the game at all. If you buy this game, you are part of the problem.WouldYouKindly said:Rule #1 of picking up online multiplayer focused games: DO NOT PICK UP ON LAUNCH DAY!
Actually, I'm kinda waiting to get my new PC though. My laptop can run it, but it'll look like ass so there's that.
Just say no to bullshit DRM.
Also, we broke Ubisoft of their bad habit by continuing to buy their games and constantly bitching about it. EA might be more dense, but they'll figure it out eventually... hopefully.
I'm also not completely opposed to what they are trying to do. It's difficult to get a city to interact how it should, let alone get more cities to interact with each other in significant ways. So yeah, there's that.