Epic President: "The Money's On Console"

DTWolfwood

Better than Vash!
Oct 20, 2009
3,716
0
0
Straying Bullet said:
DTWolfwood said:
Honesty omg how refreshing! Thanks EPIC for actually admitting you're all in it for the money!
It's always money, we are partially to blame for this. We demand better and better, they need a bigger budget and you cannot live on charity 24/7. They have balls to admit and I fully agree with them. I don't regret one moment leaving PC gaming for my Xbox360. I love it, the games are amazing and some exclusives are just worth it.

Either way, good luck with Gears of War 3 Epic!
its nice when a development studio just straight up say something like this i totally respect them for that. just completely tired of how everything has to so PC for PR >.<
 

Cabisco

New member
May 7, 2009
2,433
0
0
BlindChance said:
I snipped just so the thread doesn't get cluttered
Nice research you did there, the quotes highlight what the industry pretty much thinks and thats all that really matters to them. I mean you could argue that piracy isn't as big a problem as they make out, but they are the ones investing millions into something and then millions more to attempt to protect their investment. Whilst I really don't see PC gaming just dying, I do see it becoming much smaller and big exclusives becoming very rare. Hell the recent news that people where Pirating the Humble Indie Bundle just confirmed to me that Pirates on PCs are just dicks period. The true problem will occur when piracy increases on the consoles.
 

JEBWrench

New member
Apr 23, 2009
2,572
0
0
Cody211282 said:
It would be nice to at least once hear a company come out and say "hey sorry about that last game. You know it sucked we know it sucked and we will use this as a learning experience for next time."

Do you know fast I would buy their next game?
When was the last time you bought an EA game?

Because they said pretty much that in 2008.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
squid5580 said:
Woodsey said:
squid5580 said:
Woodsey said:
kinky257 said:
Woodsey said:
"the future of the PC market lies with games like Farmville."

I haven't even bothered reading past that point. All he gets is a +1 moron stat in my mind.
Why so? He most likely correct, I mean Farmville apparently has an average of 30 million people playing it daily. Wow, arguably the most successful game in the world, wishes it could have those numbers with a total subscriber-ship of around 12 million.
Because the market that plays Farmville is not the market that plays games as we know them.
Exactly the point. The market is changing. He could sell out like other companies have and will continue to do so to cash in on these other gamers. And if he was this passionless monster like people are trying to make him out to be then he would. The alternative is to move where he can stay out of the red and keep making the games he is passionate about.
No, the market isn't changing; they're separate groups.

And I seriously doubt that someone who solely games on a PC and played Wolfenstein 10 years ago now plays Farmville as his game-of-choice.
Why do you believe they owe you anything? Seriously why? They don't owe you a stitch of loyalty. Do you think that they will keep investing billions of dolllars to appease us? Consoles are going the exact same route. And the reason is right there smacking us in the face. Over the past 29 years (since I played my first game) they haven't changed. Sure graphics have gotten shinier, controllers have gotten more complicated and production values have skyrocketed. They haven't changed until recently. And look at the results. The Wii kicked everyone's ass. Farmville is the most popular game ever. So who cares if xXWolfensteinfanXx doesn't play Farmville? His voice is drowned right out by all the people who do play Farmville as their game of choice. This isn't 10 years ago. This is 10 years later. The mammals are takin over. And it will only get worse. If you look up you can see the meteor coming right for us.
I don't believe they owe me anything (I don't think I've ever even played a game made by them anyway) - I'm just pointing out that (I think) he's wrong.
 

Eldarion

New member
Sep 30, 2009
1,887
0
0
Jesus Phish said:
Furburt said:
Hell, everyone knew this already. But gaming should not be about money, at least not totally, gaming should be about passion for your work.
Any time I hear people saying this about anything, music, movies, books, anything at all, all I can think is, it's a nice idea, but this is business. Epic probably wouldn't be in a place to be putting out Gears 3 right now if they had stayed on PC. I'm sure the people at Epic do have a passion for their work.

I'm sure they'd also like to be able to turn a profit. Look at all the really really good devs who didn't move to making games for consoles and aren't around anymore.
What Furburt said there is what I have been thinking the entire time. If games weren't so focused on making money they could have more room to make new and interesting games. Art should be about the art, not the money,
 

Jesus Phish

New member
Jan 28, 2010
751
0
0
Dark Templar said:
Jesus Phish said:
Furburt said:
Hell, everyone knew this already. But gaming should not be about money, at least not totally, gaming should be about passion for your work.
Any time I hear people saying this about anything, music, movies, books, anything at all, all I can think is, it's a nice idea, but this is business. Epic probably wouldn't be in a place to be putting out Gears 3 right now if they had stayed on PC. I'm sure the people at Epic do have a passion for their work.

I'm sure they'd also like to be able to turn a profit. Look at all the really really good devs who didn't move to making games for consoles and aren't around anymore.
What Furburt said there is what I have been thinking the entire time. If games weren't so focused on making money they could have more room to make new and interesting games. Art should be about the art, not the money,
Is that why art students at my girlfriends college sell 50c worth of paper with some crayon scratchings on them for ?300? And I litterally mean scratchings.
 

Eldarion

New member
Sep 30, 2009
1,887
0
0
Jesus Phish said:
Dark Templar said:
Jesus Phish said:
Furburt said:
Hell, everyone knew this already. But gaming should not be about money, at least not totally, gaming should be about passion for your work.
Any time I hear people saying this about anything, music, movies, books, anything at all, all I can think is, it's a nice idea, but this is business. Epic probably wouldn't be in a place to be putting out Gears 3 right now if they had stayed on PC. I'm sure the people at Epic do have a passion for their work.

I'm sure they'd also like to be able to turn a profit. Look at all the really really good devs who didn't move to making games for consoles and aren't around anymore.
What Furburt said there is what I have been thinking the entire time. If games weren't so focused on making money they could have more room to make new and interesting games. Art should be about the art, not the money,
Is that why art students at my girlfriends college sell 50c worth of paper with some crayon scratchings on them for ?300? And I litterally mean scratchings.
No that isn't what I meant. Its kinda the opposite.
 

Cody211282

New member
Apr 25, 2009
2,892
0
0
JEBWrench said:
Cody211282 said:
It would be nice to at least once hear a company come out and say "hey sorry about that last game. You know it sucked we know it sucked and we will use this as a learning experience for next time."

Do you know fast I would buy their next game?
When was the last time you bought an EA game?

Because they said pretty much that in 2008.
I bought The Saboteur, Mass Effect 2, Battlefield Bad Company 2, Dragon Age: Origins and Awakening. So I guess that counts.

And what game did they say that for?
 

JEBWrench

New member
Apr 23, 2009
2,572
0
0
Cody211282 said:
I bought The Saboteur, Mass Effect 2, Battlefield Bad Company 2, Dragon Age: Origins and Awakening. So I guess that counts.

And what game did they say that for?
Catwoman. Which, while it took them a while to say that, hey, at least they said it. And it didn't take them as long as John Romero.
 

wonkify

New member
Oct 2, 2009
143
0
0
Sigh. XBOX360 is getting pirated like crazy. Duh, as the components continue to become just a PC you can't upgrade the pirating becomes more similar as well. But it is hard to imagine with such a massive consumer base of PC's around the world that pirating cancels that out. It just doesn't compute. You are talking orders of magnitude more PC's than consoles worldwide.

And who is fooling whom here, by far the biggest piracy has got to be the countries around the world that blow off any consideration of copyright, Asian continent and surrounds in particular, not individuals torrenting.

I can't afford to support multiple gaming platforms and the PC is the one with multiple functions. If companies feel my $60, along with millions of others, is unwanted then I won't bother with them either. If a company gives me the back of the hand and brings a title out months later for PC or not at all, screw them.

I just watched Alan Wake on Youtube. A pale version of playing it myself? Of course, but since they don't want me for a customer I don't see much choice. Now I know how the game's story comes out and if some day a year from now a crappy, buggy port, likely still loaded with some insulting DRM scheme comes out for the PC they can jam it in their ear.

I'm really tired of being treated as guilty of theft before proven innocent and devalued as a customer because of my preference in gaming platform. They should be equal. My system is upgraded and has capability consoles can't touch and that gap becomes more apparent as each gen of consoles ages. But so what? I think it's great that so many people love their PS3s and Xbox's, handhelds, etc.

If it gets too severe I guess I'll eventually bail on gaming as an activity and find something else for a hobby. It really is that unacceptable to me. Really a shame as I've enjoyed gaming since I was a kid with a Commodore 64 until now.

Who needs being insulted, disregarded and generally made to feel unwanted when they are just looking for some fun and escapism?
 

Dr.Helios

New member
Mar 31, 2010
89
0
0
personally the only games I play on the PC these days are RTS games so this doesn't really worry me too much, although I hope those RTS games stay available on the PC because I don't think that they will ever work with console controllers.
 

AceDiamond

New member
Jul 7, 2008
2,293
0
0
squid5580 said:
Why do you believe they owe you anything? Seriously why? They don't owe you a stitch of loyalty. Do you think that they will keep investing billions of dolllars to appease us? Consoles are going the exact same route. And the reason is right there smacking us in the face. Over the past 29 years (since I played my first game) they haven't changed. Sure graphics have gotten shinier, controllers have gotten more complicated and production values have skyrocketed. They haven't changed until recently. And look at the results. The Wii kicked everyone's ass. Farmville is the most popular game ever. So who cares if xXWolfensteinfanXx doesn't play Farmville? His voice is drowned right out by all the people who do play Farmville as their game of choice. This isn't 10 years ago. This is 10 years later. The mammals are takin over. And it will only get worse. If you look up you can see the meteor coming right for us.
So if I'm reading this right, you're basically resorting to the "casual" vs. "hardcore" bullshit label argument again. Frankly I don't see what the deal is. Ok so the games being played like Farmville aren't necessarily fitting your definition of a game, hell they don't fit my definition either, but unfortunately they are games and acting like an elitist isn't going to change that.

And really I don't see this apocalypse of casuals happening either. There are plenty of mainstream and independent developers still thriving on the PC market.
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
AceDiamond said:
squid5580 said:
Why do you believe they owe you anything? Seriously why? They don't owe you a stitch of loyalty. Do you think that they will keep investing billions of dolllars to appease us? Consoles are going the exact same route. And the reason is right there smacking us in the face. Over the past 29 years (since I played my first game) they haven't changed. Sure graphics have gotten shinier, controllers have gotten more complicated and production values have skyrocketed. They haven't changed until recently. And look at the results. The Wii kicked everyone's ass. Farmville is the most popular game ever. So who cares if xXWolfensteinfanXx doesn't play Farmville? His voice is drowned right out by all the people who do play Farmville as their game of choice. This isn't 10 years ago. This is 10 years later. The mammals are takin over. And it will only get worse. If you look up you can see the meteor coming right for us.
So if I'm reading this right, you're basically resorting to the "casual" vs. "hardcore" bullshit label argument again. Frankly I don't see what the deal is. Ok so the games being played like Farmville aren't necessarily fitting your definition of a game, hell they don't fit my definition either, but unfortunately they are games and acting like an elitist isn't going to change that.

And really I don't see this apocalypse of casuals happening either. There are plenty of mainstream and independent developers still thriving on the PC market.
Uhh either you are reading it wrong or you quoted the wrong post. Nowhere do I use hardcore or casual. Those words are meaningless to me. Nor do I claim Farmville isn't a game. It is. Not my type of game but it is a game. They have found a way to attract more customers. How? By changing the way we game. 360 and PS3 are also thriving FOR NOW. Games that require joysticks and buttons are thriving FOR NOW. What is it going to look like 20 years from now when kids grow up not playing Doom or Quake or NESes but using things like Natals and Wiimotes? How is a mouse and keyboard going to appeal to them then?
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
Dark Templar said:
Jesus Phish said:
Dark Templar said:
Jesus Phish said:
Furburt said:
Hell, everyone knew this already. But gaming should not be about money, at least not totally, gaming should be about passion for your work.
Any time I hear people saying this about anything, music, movies, books, anything at all, all I can think is, it's a nice idea, but this is business. Epic probably wouldn't be in a place to be putting out Gears 3 right now if they had stayed on PC. I'm sure the people at Epic do have a passion for their work.

I'm sure they'd also like to be able to turn a profit. Look at all the really really good devs who didn't move to making games for consoles and aren't around anymore.
What Furburt said there is what I have been thinking the entire time. If games weren't so focused on making money they could have more room to make new and interesting games. Art should be about the art, not the money,
Is that why art students at my girlfriends college sell 50c worth of paper with some crayon scratchings on them for ?300? And I litterally mean scratchings.
No that isn't what I meant. Its kinda the opposite.
And how are they supposed to afford to make said art? How long would it take them to make a game if they have to work a 9-5. Take care of a family. And eat? How much money do you think they get to keep and how much goes into the next piece of art? You sound like you want a company to make a game and then shut it down. Close the doors, hand out the pink slips and everyone goes on their merry way. That is not the way to encourage more artists to spend years and tons of cash for schooling for a one shot deal.
 

Eldarion

New member
Sep 30, 2009
1,887
0
0
squid5580 said:
Dark Templar said:
Jesus Phish said:
Dark Templar said:
Jesus Phish said:
Furburt said:
Hell, everyone knew this already. But gaming should not be about money, at least not totally, gaming should be about passion for your work.
Any time I hear people saying this about anything, music, movies, books, anything at all, all I can think is, it's a nice idea, but this is business. Epic probably wouldn't be in a place to be putting out Gears 3 right now if they had stayed on PC. I'm sure the people at Epic do have a passion for their work.

I'm sure they'd also like to be able to turn a profit. Look at all the really really good devs who didn't move to making games for consoles and aren't around anymore.
What Furburt said there is what I have been thinking the entire time. If games weren't so focused on making money they could have more room to make new and interesting games. Art should be about the art, not the money,
Is that why art students at my girlfriends college sell 50c worth of paper with some crayon scratchings on them for ?300? And I litterally mean scratchings.
No that isn't what I meant. Its kinda the opposite.
And how are they supposed to afford to make said art? How long would it take them to make a game if they have to work a 9-5. Take care of a family. And eat? How much money do you think they get to keep and how much goes into the next piece of art? You sound like you want a company to make a game and then shut it down. Close the doors, hand out the pink slips and everyone goes on their merry way. That is not the way to encourage more artists to spend years and tons of cash for schooling for a one shot deal.
That isn't even close to what I said, the only way you could come to that conclusion is if you interpret my statement WAY to literally. Think a little before you respond.
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
Dark Templar said:
squid5580 said:
Dark Templar said:
Jesus Phish said:
Dark Templar said:
Jesus Phish said:
Furburt said:
Hell, everyone knew this already. But gaming should not be about money, at least not totally, gaming should be about passion for your work.
Any time I hear people saying this about anything, music, movies, books, anything at all, all I can think is, it's a nice idea, but this is business. Epic probably wouldn't be in a place to be putting out Gears 3 right now if they had stayed on PC. I'm sure the people at Epic do have a passion for their work.

I'm sure they'd also like to be able to turn a profit. Look at all the really really good devs who didn't move to making games for consoles and aren't around anymore.
What Furburt said there is what I have been thinking the entire time. If games weren't so focused on making money they could have more room to make new and interesting games. Art should be about the art, not the money,
Is that why art students at my girlfriends college sell 50c worth of paper with some crayon scratchings on them for ?300? And I litterally mean scratchings.
No that isn't what I meant. Its kinda the opposite.
And how are they supposed to afford to make said art? How long would it take them to make a game if they have to work a 9-5. Take care of a family. And eat? How much money do you think they get to keep and how much goes into the next piece of art? You sound like you want a company to make a game and then shut it down. Close the doors, hand out the pink slips and everyone goes on their merry way. That is not the way to encourage more artists to spend years and tons of cash for schooling for a one shot deal.
That isn't even close to what I said, the only way you could come to that conclusion is if you interpret my statement WAY to literally. Think a little before you respond.
Well if you don't want your responses to be taken literally maybe you are the one who needs to rethink how you post them. Or figure out how the real world works.