I have to agree as soon as they said "from the creators of superbad", I already knew and was waiting to hear his name. I mean for christsakes, can't the Apatow choose someone else in these films? I think he appeared in either the lead role or as an supporting character in just about all of Apatow movies he directed/produced (yes I am stretching it but still).Verlander said:It didn't look funny, and I'm so sick of Seth Rogen it actually hurts a little. I enjoy your reviews Bob, but I generally don't agree with them a lot...
I think your a touch confused there mate- ID did no such thing, in fact it was completely discredited and when it came to trial ID was laughed out the building for being "little more then creationism in a cheap tuxedo".Frostryu said:are we still pissed off about the disproving about ALOT of the theories of evolution, and the big bang.
So. If someone was born and raised in natzi Germany then it;s okay to kill jews for him?FROGGEman2 said:It's a bad argument, sure. From our perspective. But to them it's not. Asking them to change their view on something they hold this dear is like asking a person to give up their cultural heritage because it's "dumb".bahumat42 said:well making fun of somebody because of something they can't change is worse than making funof somebody for something they can.FROGGEman2 said:-People being racist-
Moviebob: WHAT THE HELL YOU GUYS ARE EVIL
-People making fun of religious people-
Moviebob: HELL YEAH GUYS YOU'RE GREAT
gah
seriously what the hell
also I feel obliged to point out that that Jeff Dunham was
a) Making fun of terrorists specifically, not all arabic people
b) bringing a stereotype out and ridiculing it, a good thing against racism.
I'm not even religious, but you seem to have not thought this through.
And he's not really against religous people, just the ID people, and to be fair it is a bad argument.
There is no real way to validate this, Moviebob's just a hypocrite.
You are just Trolling right?Frostryu said:Why must we always be hating on the itellegent design? or are we still pissed off about the disproving about ALOT of the theories of evolution, and the big bang. Oh wait, since no one pays attention to us disproving those theories, i guess we never did. Sorry if i seem just a little annoyed at this, but us ID people get ALOT, excuse me, ALOT of shit about this. Dont mean to flame but still, it doth get annoting to my sences. Im just wondering why its okay to take pot shots at intellegent design, but say, homosexuality or abortion, and we are suddenly crossing a line? why does are belief in where we come from so much lower then what we think we are. Can someone answer that for me?
FYI, YES I UNDERSTAND MY TYPING SUCKS GREATLY.
1. No one calls it ID. I think it is called "Panspermic theory" or something.Ritter315 said:At this point Bob, you dont just come across as arrogent, you come across as ignorant. Yea I said it. I say this because you said this "There's never not a good time to give a screw you to the intelligent design argument" Which is plain STUPID because one of the theories of intelligent design is...aliens. Yes, aliens. There is a theory that human was introduced to earth through aliens. Just wanted you to know that.
If ID would be science at all (and it is not) then it would be merely a hypothesis (that what you described). Theory needs to be proven first.BlueInkAlchemist said:I'm all for a Pegg/Frost team-up. Just might go see this one.
Can I correctly assume that the people getting screwed in the screw-you moments are people that believe ID to be 100% undeniable irrefutable fact? Because those people are nuts. ID is a theory, nothing more, and should be taught and treated as such. It could be wrong or it could be right, possibly fact and possibly fiction, like the existence of extraterrestrial life, the presence of a divine universal (un)consciousness and the humanity of Jack Thompson.
That's definitely more of a Creationist stance than an argument for ID, not to mention something of a gross generalization. I agree, however, that we often bend the facts to fit a theory rather than basing a theory on the facts.Wened said:How ID works:
1. Old scriptures tell us that we were created so we need to bend facts to prove it.
2. ???
3. JESUS IS KING!!!
Theory - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theoryxKevzeppelinx said:To be fair, though, evolution is just a theory too. Some people take evolution as a 100% undeniable irrefutable fact. I think that some people in this thread are getting Intelligent Design mixed up with Creationism, which is kinda what MB did in his review when he flashed the picture of the ad for the Creationism Museum while talking about Intelligent Design.BlueInkAlchemist said:I'm all for a Pegg/Frost team-up. Just might go see this one.
Can I correctly assume that the people getting screwed in the screw-you moments are people that believe ID to be 100% undeniable irrefutable fact? Because those people are nuts. ID is a theory, nothing more, and should be taught and treated as such. It could be wrong or it could be right, possibly fact and possibly fiction, like the existence of extraterrestrial life, the presence of a divine universal (un)consciousness and the humanity of Jack Thompson.
Most of mentally disabled ppl spend their time watching cartoons and eating corndogs. ID ppl spend their time undercutting scientific research. If i let retards eat their corndogs i lose nothing. But if i let ID ppl do their thing then in some way it will make me responsible for their actions. Better science = better medicine and standard of life.Madman123456 said:If a mentally challenged Person drooled on your Shoe, would you kick him in the Head and call him a retard?
I doubt it.
However, that is what this movie does. It attacks Creationism, which is in my Book the result of a mental Disability.
I dont even know where to begin with this.Frostryu said:Funny, we ID people have done the research. Youre little ID thing is missing steps 2 through ten you know. Actually, you're big bang theory has had to stretch a few facts, but you call it waiting for info, to that makes it okay then. Oh, sorry, "inconclusive data". Sad thing is, neither side has enough data to prove, WHITOUT A DOUBT, that they are 100% right. Things keep coming up that change the way we look at things, so quit bitching that ID people are foinded on nothing and Science if completely founded. Its not the case, science will change. My own science teacher, aitheist to the core, even said that the bing bang, is " the best THEORY we have AT THE MOMENT." it will probably be proved wrong. WHo knows, maybe we will find aliens or extraterestials who can prove creation and ID. I honestly think that would be interesting. And know you guys are gonna quote me and drive home all your little points based on what i said and how wrong and biased i am.
Frigging wonderful.
But sigh, whatever.