The only thing I completely agree with in regards to Bob's review is the whole lesbian thing, mainly because there was no point in mentioning it OTHER than to have Riddick be crass about it. Her character would have worked just as well without mentioning it and the bit at the end would have made more sense were she not a self-proclaimed lesbian. I think the ONLY reason you would mention that in this movie is if there were another female character and the relationship between the two was there to add some tension, or a greater sense of danger. In this case it was just something tacked on for no good reason.
Beyond that. I am not sure what more Bob wants in terms of explanation regarding the second movie. Seriously, they pretty much sum up the whole thing, Riddick was king, he got complacent, people didn't like that, so they tried to kill him. All of which makes perfect sense in regards to the character.
Now, where I think this movie was let down was in the tension/suspense department. Pitch Black works because of the unknown element, this movie telegraphs everything that is going to happen, before it happens. It was a descent movie, made on a smaller budget. I think for the most part Bob is correct, just gets a little too "i hate the cool kids" for my taste when talking about movies like this.
Beyond that. I am not sure what more Bob wants in terms of explanation regarding the second movie. Seriously, they pretty much sum up the whole thing, Riddick was king, he got complacent, people didn't like that, so they tried to kill him. All of which makes perfect sense in regards to the character.
Now, where I think this movie was let down was in the tension/suspense department. Pitch Black works because of the unknown element, this movie telegraphs everything that is going to happen, before it happens. It was a descent movie, made on a smaller budget. I think for the most part Bob is correct, just gets a little too "i hate the cool kids" for my taste when talking about movies like this.