I'd agree, but the Back to the Future Trilogy, as far as I'm aware from watching the DVD extras on the boxset were all filmed in a year.How bloody quickly are they churning these films out though? Perhaps they might be able to put something vaguely approaching quality in it if they were taking at least a year to film and distribute the bloody thing.
All three films, admittedly the second one wasn't as great as perhaps it could have been, but still, there's significant quality in those films regardless.
(In my point of view, even standing up against modern titles the Back to the Future trilogy shines bright.)
The Twilight saga however has consistently awful quality (although I hear they're filmed very well, from a technical standpoint, it's just the concept and acting that makes it shit) within a probably larger amount of production time.
So the amount of time spent on the film doesn't always indicate how awful it'll end up.
Advent Children for sake of example took several years and that still ended up being no more than a perfectly rendered disappointment in the eyes of many.
OT:
I gotta admit, the message scares me too, I've seen people who've reacted positively to these films and read the books and they tell me straight-faced that they're works of brilliance, worth the attention and I supposed 'worship' they receive.
It genuinely scares me when I hear that when the story is essentially a super-natural alternative to a school-girl making the difficult choice between bestiality and marrying her neighbourhood paedophile/stalker...
Nice addition of the Frisbee too.
Sorry to the guy(s) I quoted before I edited this post. Didn't realise I'd screwed it a bit.