It does!Zaul2010 said:Jackie Chan in The happening - kick Mark Whalberg's ass and end the moviefreaper said:Jackie Chan makes everything better.
Jackie Chan in The last airbender - Forget the airbender and just have Jackie fighting the fire mages.
Jackie Chan in Transformers - Knock out Megan Fox and Shia Le Beef so its actually about the robots.
Jackie Chan in Green lanturn - Kill Sinestro so there can't be an equally bad sequel.
It works
Ha. Hahahahaha. Ahh, you're funny, ZeppMan217.ZeppMan217 said:What, Puss in the Boots isn't good?
Well supposedly Murphy has put the axe on that himself. In the Rolling Stone interview he recently gave he talked about it.Hungry Donner said:You all do realize what will follow [http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/06/03/beverly-hills-cop-4-may-be-geared-towards-kids-says-brett-ratner] if this movie does well in the box office. Hasn't Axel suffered enough?
So there's that at least.There was a big push for "Beverly Hills Cop IV" - What's going on with that? They're not doing it. What I'm trying to do with "Beverly Hills Cop" now is produce a TV show starring Axel Foley's son, and Axel is the chief of police in Detroit. I'd do the pilot, show up here and there. None of the movie scripts were right; it was trying to force this premise. If you have to force something you shouldn't be doing it. It was always a rehash of the old thing, it was always wrong.
What does The Expendables have to do with this? Besides that Bob didn't like either oneNameIsRobertPaulson said:3000 comments... 4 video boycotts... and dozens upon dozens of bile from your fans who you INSULTED later...MovieBob said:Tower Heist
Two hours of your life will be stolen.
Watch Video
And you still can't let the Expendables thing go, can you?
I shudder to think what will happen if Metroid goes multi-platform.
Same, which is why I might eventually see this...Giest4life said:Hey....I quite liked Rush Hour and Rush Hour 2.
The idea is to get a group of friends together to watch it together. Not for one person to pay $60 bucks. Though I agree $60 is too much, but if I had three or four friends over, I wouldn't mind paying $30 or so bucks.Caramel Frappe said:$59.99 .. What?
Seeing the movies usually is $15-$18 where I live by myself. I get to see it on a huge screen, with nice comfy seats in the dark with popcorn, a soda, and candy that I can purchase free with my membership card.
They want to charge me triple the money, by buying it to see 'once' at my hose on my regular screen TV with no luxurious snacks to order? All a few months before it comes out on DVD? ... I, would really like to know who came up with that. Not going to yell, or scold... just question them on why. That's the amount I would get for a game like Skyrim (spite that it's $10 over the amount). Not to mention what if the movie like Bob said blows? Then that's just money wasted. People aren't made of money especially in these hard times in the economy so yeah that's going to bankrupt them for sure.
The 68% is based on 131 critic reviews, while the general audience has it at 70%. Enough people have seen it.bahumat42 said:the huge difference being that all the regular viewers haven't gotten around to rating it yet thus dragging the score down.moviedork said:This movie's nothing like The Expendables. Just because Bob trashed both don't make them similar at all.Jman1236 said:Yeah looks like Hollywood is using "The Expendables" as a benchmark as now on. Just put a bunch of Triple-A stars in and magically(within the first weekend) and it prints money, let's do lunch.
Also maybe you guys should give the movie a chance. It's got a 68% on rotten tomatoes with most people saying it's a fluffy movie that's somewhat entertaining. Give it a chance! There's a huge difference on Rotten Tomatoes between a 40% movie (The Expendables) and a 68% on Tower Heist. Give it a chance and make up your own mind about it.