Terrifying precedent in favour of state censorship of the press on political matters, have you any idea what you are proposing?SenseOfTumour said:This is exactly why we need stronger regulations on newspaper articles, if it wasn't for the continual stream of utter bullshit printed to ridicule everything the EU does, I wouldn't be in the situation where I pretty much end up disregarding all these stories as dumb Daily Mail anti EU nonsense.
Seems there's two sets of opinions and not much in the way of facts.
Especially in this case when the EU so clearly are in the wrong!
Maybe before you demand laws of censorship you could actually read what the issues was actually about, this ruling is on ALL WATER whether in a bottle, from a tap, from a spring, from a rain-pipe or anywhere... it is forbidden to emphasise its sole nutritive quality!To me it does seem like a bottled water company was trying to fund research so they could claim something over tap water, when that's just not going to be true, however.
If I'm wrong then fair enough, but I sense, even if it's not come thru in the articles, that the EU simply had to fight thru a lot of legal stuff to ensure that they couldn't make bold claims that applied equally to free, clean tap water.
What the hell else can water do other than prevent dehydration!?!?
Branding such an essential nutrient as water as a "medicine" is something a committed of 21 people could conjour up after 3 years. Any answer to such a simple question you know is not really about the question but protecting their ruling system from scrutiny. They clearly screwed up in their definitions and are to arrogant to admit the rules need to be changed to emphasise the role of nutrition in diseases as distinct from medicines.
The problem is their blanket rule "you cannot advertise food/drinks as preventing diseases" assumes that no foods or nutrients can prevent diseases, even diseases of malnutrition... they treat all foods as if frivolus luxuries.
And you know why people are mad? Because they do NOT have any democratic weight in this. It's all far beyond their representation.