They don't, they are far too deep for that.OtherSideofSky said:Are they? I'm pretty sure people are applauding his trolling and being an asshole. Almost every other post is some Eva fan pointing out that it isn't an argument, which really makes me question if any of them have a sense of humor.
I say if you can't make fun of something you love, you can't truly love it because you can't see it clearly. And Eva is easier to mock than most.JMPease21 said:As much as I love the series, the jokes about Shinji being a whiny ***** are completely deserved
There are FCC rules about advertising in media, so when it aired in America the Pizza Hut logo may have had to have been removed. I don't know, however, I watched the DVDs, where the logos are in place, remaining true to the creators' original vision.Desert Punk said:One of the biggest examples I can think of is that Pizza Hut the pizza place helped fund the creation of Code Geass, so when CC was obsessed with Pizza, she was always eating out of a Pizza Hut's box. For some strange reason though they removed the Pizza Hut's references from the actual animation when they imported it and dubed it in america. I have seen product placement in other Anime as well from time to time.
If by "a crazy guy" you mean "co-founder of the company", and by "anime they know will flop so they can rake in insurance" you mean "due to the success of Evangelion, Gainax's treasurer committed tax fraud to the tune of several million dollars in an attempt to shore up the company's eternally shaky finances" (that's the only money-related thing I know about Eva, anyway), then yes, you're correct.Rakor said:As I recall, the project of the original evangelion was pretty much The Producers. As in grabbing a crazy guy to write an anime they know will flop so they can rake in insurance or w/e. And all the religious references were just there to look cool. Then it turned out to be cool.....
I am reminded of this big book of religious interpretations of See Spot, See Spot Run, Run Spot Run....
Don't say it, Dr. Cakey, don't say a damn thing against Ghost in the Shell or the other posters will eat you alive...hentropy said:I watched Lain and GitS before I watched NGE, and by that time NGE looked relatively simple, almost looking like a pale imitation of what the others were trying to pull off, despite it coming before either of the anime series (although GitS was a manga at the time).
Searching up the image results in it being called an "Onahole"1337mokro said:You are indeed very warm with the last guess.TheFinalFantasyWolf said:Considering it says something along the lines of "Link connected lotion" in the left bottom corner of the box, I'd say you're closer with the sex doll/toy theory. 0_0Gordon_4 said:Right now I can't decide if its a sex doll or some kind of ice tray for drink bottles. Could go either way on this one.Zykon TheLich said:Ok, I'll bite. What the fuck is it?1337mokro said:I think I can One Up everyone else here, if you known what it is, congratulations, you have spent enough time on the internet to lose most of your soul
If you want they have the other female types as well. Sadly ladies and gents no Shinji version.
Also captcha: no means no...heh, captcha has been reading your post.
DING DING DING!!!Mocmocman said:Searching up the image results in it being called an "Onahole"1337mokro said:You are indeed very warm with the last guess.TheFinalFantasyWolf said:Considering it says something along the lines of "Link connected lotion" in the left bottom corner of the box, I'd say you're closer with the sex doll/toy theory. 0_0Gordon_4 said:Right now I can't decide if its a sex doll or some kind of ice tray for drink bottles. Could go either way on this one.Zykon TheLich said:Ok, I'll bite. What the fuck is it?1337mokro said:I think I can One Up everyone else here, if you known what it is, congratulations, you have spent enough time on the internet to lose most of your soul
If you want they have the other female types as well. Sadly ladies and gents no Shinji version.
Also captcha: no means no...heh, captcha has been reading your post.
Carrying on with my new lead, I came across this video:
Using my detective powers, I'm going to say that it is some sort of fake vagina?
Because teh rei is everyone's waifu.Eppy (Bored) said:...I shouldn't be surprised that those love pillows exist. That said:
*horror*
My childhood. Why.
Uh, I feel like you kind of missed the point of a few things. Evangelion isn't mind blowing or anything, but it is clearly poignant and shows complexity in the characters. Just because you pulled yourself up by your bootsraps doesn't mean the psychoanalysis of Shinji's character isn't an interesting dissection in and of itself, and there's clearly more to his character than "whiny spoiled teen". I mean the Oedipal themes alone pretty much hit you in the face like a brick, along with several other prominent psychological themes like parents using their children vicariously and DID.Sheo_Dagana said:Evangelion... I bought the DVDs when I was about 16 and watched the hell out of them. Back then, I thought it was an incredibly deep story with a character I could sympathize with. Now that I'm 28, I can't even stand to look at anything Eva related. The deep story just comes across as pretentious and the main character is a whiney brat.
I guess the difference was that I was able to relate to Shinji when I was a spoiled 16 year old who thought life was hard just because the girl I loved didn't love me back and my parents were divorced. Now I'm just a mildly disappointed adult that gets frustrated with teenage characters very quickly. Maybe that's why I don't get into JRPGs anymore. =/
[The Joke]-------------->axlryder said:Of course, the first, "mature" point actually makes sense, and is pretty much what I figured the artist/writer duo were going for when writing the initial comic. Sadly, the "cheap shot" second half doesn't fair so well. Since branding and merch does absolutely nothing to invalidate the artistic merit of the original material, to make such an implication, even in an attempt at humor, kind of comes off as a poor rebuttal. I'm sure that logical failing will be reflected in the comments. In light of that, it sort of made me wince and chuckle at the same time.