You're a large fan of the series since the first bits but hate the mojave desert?Wait what?!Also New Vegas sees the continuation of the story in the original franchise and it doesn't repeat another Vault Story...Cmon you can't have 50 games and all of them starting or heading towards the same spot.New Vegas with all it's issues was the true successor of the original Fallout Series and I'd rather drink cactus juice anytime than get out from another vault to crawl through another metro.Jovip said:alright, I'm a big follower if the fallout series, since the first one.
but i enjoy Bethesda's version as well. (i don't consider new vegas a game in the fallout series, because i hated it so much)
But is anyone else excited for fallout 4? i know it will run on the same engine that skyrim is being developed on. but even then, if the developers completely leave that stupid barren piece of shit Mojave wasteland and get back to big city's, a well developed story. plus a chance at bug-less game play. well it's something to be excited about. what do you guys think?
Hmm...should make hardcore mode easier. Om nom nomKungfu_Teddybear said:That it runs on a new engine. The scenery and characters in Fallout 3/New Vegas look like it was all moulded from cottage cheese.
I feel this would cut down on the exploration and random encounters, which I enjoy. Also many 'fights' would be mowing down Raiders.sora91111 said:Vehicles for faster travel.
Fallout: Mad Max?distortedreality said:Fallout : Australia.xXxJessicaxXx said:I think they might have trouble thinking up dangerous animals for England.
Everything fucking kills you here. Having said that, I wouldn't want to go up against a radioactive badger.
I second this. I want to see some Michigan wastleland, with weather cycles.AlternatePFG said:I would love to see Obsidian do the writing and the dialogue, while Bethesda actually makes the world itself. That probably wouldn't happen but eh.
...New Vegas was more a Fallout game than Fallout 3 was, it had people actually familiar with the other Fallout games making it, even having more and similar systems from the first Fallout games. I liked the terrain and story alot better in New Vegas, Fallout 3 had very booring enviroments and the main story was... well shit IMO, what I liked in Fallout 3 was the side missions, so I'm just saying I disagree with your statement, Fallout 3 is the game which I wouldn't consider a Fallout game. Even if bugs and glitches are more present in New Vegas...Jovip said:alright, I'm a big follower if the fallout series, since the first one.
but i enjoy Bethesda's version as well. (i don't consider new vegas a game in the fallout series, because i hated it so much)
But is anyone else excited for fallout 4? i know it will run on the same engine that skyrim is being developed on. but even then, if the developers completely leave that stupid barren piece of shit Mojave wasteland and get back to big city's, a well developed story. plus a chance at bug-less game play. well it's something to be excited about. what do you guys think?