I think that was the whole point behind the 'with air cover please'... though more in the super-heavies' case than even what battleships the Brits chucked out.Slycne said:The arm chair historian in me needed to respond. "with air cover please" The Yamato and Musashi were relics of a bygone era as soon as they rolled off the dry docks. They were horrifically undergunned for anti-air, even after a refit to attempt to address the problem. Also, a submarine isn't worried about a battleship's armor. Ship armor comes in the form of belts, and they only skirt below the surface of the water. The Yamato itself was ultimately sunk by torpedoes hitting the bottom, unarmored side, of her hull as she was listing.
The Type 96 3 x 25mm was one of the shitest AA options in service. Who kits out an AA battery with 15 round magazines, FFS?! They were crap against high-speed aircraft, shook if you shot them too quickly, shot out too quickly anyway and to cap it off, had a lousy rate of fire in the first place. It was a compromise for which compromise was one of the dumbest things you could contemplate. :/
*shrug*
Oh hey! Long time no see... -.-A_Parked_Car said:Off the top of my head I would say that my favourite ship is the Japanese fleet carrier Shokaku. It was a really nice looking carrier and proved to be quite handy throughout the early part of the Pacific War. Though her sister-ship Zuikaku had a much more distinguished career.
I take issue with Shoukaku for two reasons... its superstructure was too far forward for my liking... and, trivially enough, the name. 'Flying Crane'? Colour me eh...(!!)
Still, for a 34000ton carrier, she was very well armoured, long-ranged and was nifty in a race...