Chaos Isaac said:
I know. And I find that to be arbitrary. I don't know where you're getting the idea that all characters are attractive, it seems that there are no problems with there being ugly male main characters. Marcus Fenix, Kane and Lynch, Max Payne, Krieg from Borderlands 2, Wario, and that's just a few playable ones. Really, there's no real reason to have a female character that's automatically good looking. That if you're just playing follow the leader without giving any unique spins on a thing, you really aren't that creative.
I'd like to know what kind of a justification the status quo is. Because it isn't. She's never sexualized? I'm sorry, what do you consider sexualization to be? Because I consider sexualization making a female character more and more sexually appealing, despite how little sense it makes for the character. Yeah, naked isn't inherently sexual. Cortana in Combat Evolved was sexualized because there was nothing to her. With the inclusion of noticeable pronounced tits (Didn't have any tits at all in CE now that I look at it) and the inclusion of hartman hips in 4 just screams "We need more sexy" to me. What, the curvy woman with a very flexible body that at one point was reduced to being flat out naked on screen is a sex doll?...WELL KINDA!
Ok...and? I don't really know why you're getting on the photoshopped version for being inaccurate to her character when her ACTUAL design is inaccurate to her character. Not to mention the photoshopped design wasn't meant to be accurate to her character, that was never the stated end goal. Because, as I pointed out, male characters can be ugly, muscular and skinny in games. Women don't have that freedom. That's why they don't bring men up, they don't NEED to. Christ, why is it whenever someone tries to bring up a problem women face someone calls it out for not mentioning men. Whenever someone tries to talk about the problems men face in domestic abuse I don't demand that they include women in the conversation. There are problems that one gender has to face that the other doesn't. Spoiler: Neither were their actual designs, they were designed to be eye candy, not people. Don't see why you're getting on one and not the other.
"have to" no one is claiming anyone "has" to do anything, all the article said was that for an industry that prides itself on realism, they seem to struggle with making women look realistic. Which, you know, is a rather good point. So do I, but I'm not really sure how this edit is pointless. You say it's not true to their characters...well it wasn't supposed to be, it was using their bodies as a template to show the gap between video game character body sizes and real life women body sizes.