Yes, as a consumer psychologist [I realise how prone to hyperbolic BS the forums may be, but this is genuinely my field of expertise - your nescient quotation marks are not required, thanks] I haven't worked with the games sector yet so couldn't attest to your claims. I *do* know that online data collection has a somewhat marked history of keeping data secure. Admittedly, I know little of this particular group, but I'd be genuinely surprised if they're not under the umbrella of another, larger data-marketing company (to whom they'd be entitled to 'share' information). Admittedly, the claim that data would be overtly 'sold' is erroneous and rash.Spinwhiz said:As a "consumer psychologist" you also know that game companies use more than a general demographic when creating and promoting their games. Much like focus groups, this is a way for different publishers to also find trends with their data, which allows them to innovate gameplay, forecast sales and make sure the consumers are getting the games they like. Also, different publishers are looking for different information, so a broad sweep of assumed demographic consumer behaviors does not work.
Also, advertisers are more likely to go after the 18-34 demographic than the 16-25 demographic you have mentioned.
As an added note, VGMarkets does not sell your information to anyone else. So, you won't be getting phone calls, emails or anything else from any outside company. We wouldn't group up with someone who would sell your information.
There is one "Your profile answers are mutually exclusive", but if it was just based on my profile answers I should've been pegged right away, not after I'd started getting surveys (and yet before I got any hint of the music). I mean, I wasn't expecting much out of this, but the promised music would be nice as opposed to "you're probably a conman, have a nice day", which is all I have to show for my work right now. Oh, well, I guess I'll give them another business day before I get really angry.Shihoudani said:Hehe.. yeah it doesn't look like they generally say it in such a direct fashion, though it seems like it's hinted at. It's the only reason I could see why you'd be suspended like that.
ThatJagoGuy said:Yes, as a consumer psychologist [I realise how prone to hyperbolic BS the forums may be, but this is genuinely my field of expertise - your nescient quotation marks are not required, thanks] I haven't worked with the games sector yet so couldn't attest to your claims. I *do* know that online data collection has a somewhat marked history of keeping data secure. Admittedly, I know little of this particular group, but I'd be genuinely surprised if they're not under the umbrella of another, larger data-marketing company (to whom they'd be entitled to 'share' information). Admittedly, the claim that data would be overtly 'sold' is erroneous and rash.Spinwhiz said:As a "consumer psychologist" you also know that game companies use more than a general demographic when creating and promoting their games. Much like focus groups, this is a way for different publishers to also find trends with their data, which allows them to innovate gameplay, forecast sales and make sure the consumers are getting the games they like. Also, different publishers are looking for different information, so a broad sweep of assumed demographic consumer behaviors does not work.
Also, advertisers are more likely to go after the 18-34 demographic than the 16-25 demographic you have mentioned.
As an added note, VGMarkets does not sell your information to anyone else. So, you won't be getting phone calls, emails or anything else from any outside company. We wouldn't group up with someone who would sell your information.
I have no question of its legitimacy, but I'd assume that The Escapist's powers-that-be would have realised that spamming the email accounts of your patrons, trying to push survey participation as though it's in their interests, is going to disenchant a good many people. Look up how mixing up Social Economies and Monetary Economies can damage relationships and brand-image...
I fear I may not have adequately addressed all points... but regardless - I'm done. I shall hold my tongue in future... and dismay quietly.
Actually, being related to someone in advertising or marketing would be more reason to disqualify you than not.mattttherman3 said:Honestly, these surveys suck, they ask me one question and then say I don't qualify and give me 10 cents, so I've made 30 cents. Just because no one in my family is in advertising or the financial market doesn't mean I don't have an opinion on it.