Jumper. Dear god was that a mess of a movie. After watching the special features though, it appears that the director was clinically insane, so that makes sense.
I think I'd have to say Blade Runner for similar reasons. I watched the 2007 cut, which is apparently a good one and, well... fuck. I have never been so bored. This coming from someone who loves The Assassination of Jesse James, and who quite enjoyed The Tree of Life.Xiroh86 said:So mine is a little more complicated, but the movie I regret watching the most is The Godfather.
Now, before everyone starts jumping down my throat about it, let me explain.
It is by no means a bad movie, and I completely understand its importance in film history, how ever i found the movie to be unenjoyable. I only made it through it, without falling asleep, once and that was the last of over 10 attempts.
Now as to why I regret watching this: do you remember the skit in family guy where Peter tries to explain that he didn't like the Godfather, and everyone verbally assaults him? well every time I mention my opinion on The Godfather I get verbally assaulted.
I guess you could say, that i don't so much regret watching that movie, as much as I regret watching it, and having the opinion of it that I do.
I think Super 8 was Spielburg attempting to re-create the success of E.T. and ABSOLUTELY failing. I also think Steven should, after ruining what could have been a great ending to the Indiana Jones series and releasing Super 8, think seriously about retiring and living off his ungodly amount of money... Same goes with Mr. Lucas... unless he decides to pull his head out of his ass and let someone else direct/write any further Star Wars movies (See Empire/ROTJ pre-re-releases).sniddy said:Skyline - That's up there - it has no redeeming features, even the special affects are kinda....meh - the plot is stupid beyond believe the ending is terrible - it's just...no
District 9 - Why was this hyped to all hell - I'm only putting it as worse then skyline as I expected more of it...
Honorable mention to Super 8 - which was the most mis-advertised films I've even seen - seriously do they want to make an action film, a sci-fi film, a monster film, a coming of age story, a touching family drama or a kids action movie - OR a jumbled mess of all the above that can't engage on any level as it;s a mess...
The third one is actually surprisingly amazing. Even if you didn't like the first one (or the awful, awful second one), the third is such a fun movie.D Moness said:I really want my time back i spend on The scorpion king (can not believe that got sequels).
Go watch "The Legend of Korra", it'll make you forget all about that trainwreck of a movie.SAMAS said:The Last Airbender. Holy crap, what a way to screw up a franchise.
It's a cult classic because it's just bad. Ed Wood films are famous because they are awful, and people will watch it just for kicks.amaranth_dru said:Human Centipede: I don't understand why this is a "cult classic". Its an excuse for gross-out, not even worthy of B-movie status
I loved Blade Runner (don't remember which cut) but the pacing was botched. It's just too slow.Woodsey said:I think I'd have to say Blade Runner for similar reasons. I watched the 2007 cut, which is apparently a good one and, well... fuck. I have never been so bored. This coming from someone who loves The Assassination of Jesse James, and who quite enjoyed The Tree of Life.
I can understand the "for kicks" thing, but its hard to compare Ed Wood's films to Human Centipede. Ed Wood clearly thought he was making masterpieces and Plan 9 featured Bela Lugosi's final on screen role, which cemented it into fame (or infamy).ElPatron said:I have seen really shitty films, but I never felt like I should regret watching them.
It's a cult classic because it's just bad. Ed Wood films are famous because they are awful, and people will watch it just for kicks.amaranth_dru said:Human Centipede: I don't understand why this is a "cult classic". Its an excuse for gross-out, not even worthy of B-movie status
It was an homage to Spielberg, not made by him. He was just the producer.amaranth_dru said:I think Super 8 was Spielburg attempting to re-create the success of E.T. and ABSOLUTELY failing. I also think Steven should, after ruining what could have been a great ending to the Indiana Jones series and releasing Super 8, think seriously about retiring and living off his ungodly amount of money... Same goes with Mr. Lucas... unless he decides to pull his head out of his ass and let someone else direct/write any further Star Wars movies (See Empire/ROTJ pre-re-releases).sniddy said:Skyline - That's up there - it has no redeeming features, even the special affects are kinda....meh - the plot is stupid beyond believe the ending is terrible - it's just...no
District 9 - Why was this hyped to all hell - I'm only putting it as worse then skyline as I expected more of it...
Honorable mention to Super 8 - which was the most mis-advertised films I've even seen - seriously do they want to make an action film, a sci-fi film, a monster film, a coming of age story, a touching family drama or a kids action movie - OR a jumbled mess of all the above that can't engage on any level as it;s a mess...
I think it has to do more with the bad acting and the whole ludicrous plot itself. Not the "violence for kicks". I have a specific kind of hate for the Saw series because I don't see the point of it all. It's just torture porn, if I wanted to watch that I wouldn't need a fictitious movie. HC and Rocky Horror Picture Show are just universes apart. RHPS is genuine classic B movie, HC is just the offspring of genre exploitation.amaranth_dru said:I can understand the "for kicks" thing, but its hard to compare Ed Wood's films to Human Centipede. Ed Wood clearly thought he was making masterpieces and Plan 9 featured Bela Lugosi's final on screen role, which cemented it into fame (or infamy).
However, Centipede was no more than a gore-fest shock-horror film. Its the same vein that I place Hostel (and its sequel) and the SAW sequels (the first movie was great, and didn't need a sequel IMO). Gore and blood for gore's sake doesn't make for a cult classic, and people who watch it for kicks are more the type of person that the people screaming against the Hitman: Absolution Stripper Nun trailer want people to believe all gamers are.
Rocky Horror Picture Show, thats a cult classic B-rate movie, Buckaroo Banzai, Flash Gordon... But Human Centipede just doesn't fit in with those movies, its gore-worship at its worst and brings down the cult classic culture.
I agree that the Saw movies were torture porn, though the first movie had a completely different tone than the rest of them and as a standalone movie I thought it was brilliant deviation from the normal horror/serial killer flicks, which the later movies just trashed. The first movie made me think how I would react being thrust in the situation and I still think the twist ending was one of the better twists in movie history. I find it sad that they ruined it with the sequels.ElPatron said:I think it has to do more with the bad acting and the whole ludicrous plot itself. Not the "violence for kicks". I have a specific kind of hate for the Saw series because I don't see the point of it all. It's just torture porn, if I wanted to watch that I wouldn't need a fictitious movie. HC and Rocky Horror Picture Show are just universes apart. RHPS is genuine classic B movie, HC is just the offspring of genre exploitation.amaranth_dru said:I can understand the "for kicks" thing, but its hard to compare Ed Wood's films to Human Centipede. Ed Wood clearly thought he was making masterpieces and Plan 9 featured Bela Lugosi's final on screen role, which cemented it into fame (or infamy).
However, Centipede was no more than a gore-fest shock-horror film. Its the same vein that I place Hostel (and its sequel) and the SAW sequels (the first movie was great, and didn't need a sequel IMO). Gore and blood for gore's sake doesn't make for a cult classic, and people who watch it for kicks are more the type of person that the people screaming against the Hitman: Absolution Stripper Nun trailer want people to believe all gamers are.
Rocky Horror Picture Show, thats a cult classic B-rate movie, Buckaroo Banzai, Flash Gordon... But Human Centipede just doesn't fit in with those movies, its gore-worship at its worst and brings down the cult classic culture.
About Himan... The trailer was absolute grindhouse, not necessarily the same thing as b-movie. As in the actual "Grindhouse" and "Machete" movies, homages to the genre.
Genre exploitation movies are actually b-movies but the majority of B-movies are not exploiting anything. And that makes a difference.
I...guess? I would say a more apt comparison is, like, spongebob or Doug or something.Asita said:...You're really starting to try my patience with the way you're taking my statements. I'm going to continue to assume that's a problem with my expression, however. In case I hadn't made it abundantly clear: I wasn't expecting the movie to be Citizen Cain. I wasn't expecting it to be comparable to Death of a Salesman, nor did I intend to imply that it should have been or even could have been. My intent was to try to understand what was going through the screenwriters' heads when they decided on the portrayal of the characters, and I found Willy Loman to be the simplest way to express what I felt was the base concept behind them: A pathetic character with little in the way of admirable features, which the writers unfortunately had no idea how to use competently, let alone well. That was the extent of my intent. I hope that clarifies things, again.Angryman101 said:I can almost guarantee that you are.
And you're so overthinking a dumb movie like Napolean Dynamite it's not even funny. Not every film holds up to fucking Citizen Cane or something, it was a dumb movie about some kid's dumb life in Idaho.
If anything it's more of a commentary on how shitty Idaho is.
As producer though he had a LOT do with making the movie, although the current generation of Producer doesn't always have full creative control, its hard to think of Spielburg just putting his name on it and letting people run free with it. Producers ultimately have final say on how the movie is released, whether or not they direct it they still have the ability to supersede directors (which has happened on multiple occasions).Bradeck said:**SNIP**
It was an homage to Spielberg, not made by him. He was just the producer.