I pretty much agree. It takes him just about half the review to get to the stuff that matters, gameplay and story. I kinda think you should lead with what kind of game it is before talking about graphics and sound for 10 minutes cuz that's kinda the crux of whether someone will be interested or not in the game obviously. I bet if he reviewed Among Us, it would take a good 10 minutes for him to tell you it's a social deduction game. Graphics and sound don't need near the time they get allocated. Sure, emphasize some high/low points of the graphics, talk about framerate and consistency for a couple mins but it's a video review, I can see how good the game looks by watching the review. Same thing with sound basically, it doesn't take long. I got nothing against going in depth of stuff like graphics and sound but that shouldn't come before gameplay. And his analysis on the important stuff is very surface level and that's the main thing I come to a review for.
I kinda hate those type of ratings. I want to know if the game is worth MY TIME to play. There's tons and tons of games I wouldn't play if they were free.
---
Also, just wondering if PS5 has PS4's accessibility options to remap controls cuz that's pretty fucking important to me.