OK, but something MUST be able to be concluded from the 25-fold difference in reported incidence per 100'000 or rapes between the USA and Japan. How can that be down to under-reporting? If it is that is a totally unacceptable level of under reporting which must be addressed, this means at least 95% of rapes are going unreported for it to be the same incidence per capita as America and 100% of rapes reported in America.cobra_ky said:It is very, very difficult to make comparisons because different countries have different definitions of rape, and enforcement also depends on cultural attitudes towards sexual assault and how seriously the authorities take it. If the victims don't think the police are going to do anything about it anyway, then they aren't going to bother reporting it, especially when doing so can open them up to shaming and more harassment.
<a href=http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20101015a2.html#.T_n6t_UZ-nA>Train groping is drastically underreported in Japan.
And I'm not just making assumptions about Egypt, either. It's only relevant insofar as it's an example of how unreliable reported rape statistics are.
Yes there is a problem, but women being sexual in video games is not a problem, why should any woman be ashamed of her sexuality? It is the lack of female protagonists in general and breadth of representation.Moonlight Butterfly said:Like I have said I don't agree with everything Sarkeesian says but at least she doesn't straight up deny there is a problem when there is clearly a problem.
You are repeating yourself now, ignoring the refutation that I have already given you and refusing to give the clarification I said was necessary.Kahunaburger said:People in this thread have already explained this to you multiple times. If you choose to remain poorly informed after a page or two of people explaining exactly why you're missing the point about this policy, there's nothing I can do to help you. If you skimmed the last few pages of the thread, read them again and actually learn from the people trying to teach you why Japan chose these policies.
They seem fine to me and I browse 4chan daily. You probably only visited /b/ and for 20 minutes at that.Treblaine said:Have you seen the way the 4chan crowd talks to each other? They are a bunch of psychos.
That makes no sense.Moonlight Butterfly said:Perhaps the very fact that they over sexualise and objectify females in most of their media including video games just adds to the problem of men seeing women as something that is there to be grabbed as they feel like it.rbstewart7263 said:This argument about the subways is very fundamentalist. ....
Last time I were there I found a thread where they were rallying to push Noah Antwiler (spoonyone) to suicide.Balobo said:They seem fine to me and I browse 4chan daily. You probably only visited /b/ and for 20 minutes at that.Treblaine said:Have you seen the way the 4chan crowd talks to each other? They are a bunch of psychos.
I think the important part is the anti-sex part. It is amazing how some can get away with attacking female characters JUST for being sexual. Disregard everything else about them, just denigrate them by calling them "busty".RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:Put yourself in the mindset of an anti-sex feminist & it makes sense. I do love that it links her & the fat conservative assholes that say a womans clothing is why she gets raped.Treblaine said:How. Bloody HOW is showing women in distinctly human and animate ways turning them into objects?!?!
Let's put it this way: if someone posts the same faulty reasoning over and over (or post a faulty argument I've seen before from someone else,) it's not fun from my perspective to respond to each instance of their one faulty argument. If they post something with more thought in it, or post something that is faulty for a new and interesting reason, I'm more likely to respond.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:ITT: People ignoring the arguments of others in attempt to avoid being proven wrong.
I'm not sure why you're bringing up the US or why such a comparison is relevant. All I've shown is that police reports are not a reliable indicator for the prevalence of sexual harassment in general, and train-groping in Japan in particular.Treblaine said:OK, but something MUST be able to be concluded from the 25-fold difference in reported incidence per 100'000 or rapes between the USA and Japan. How can that be down to under-reporting? If it is that is a totally unacceptable level of under reporting which must be addressed, this means at least 95% of rapes are going unreported for it to be the same incidence per capita as America and 100% of rapes reported in America.cobra_ky said:It is very, very difficult to make comparisons because different countries have different definitions of rape, and enforcement also depends on cultural attitudes towards sexual assault and how seriously the authorities take it. If the victims don't think the police are going to do anything about it anyway, then they aren't going to bother reporting it, especially when doing so can open them up to shaming and more harassment.
<a href=http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20101015a2.html#.T_n6t_UZ-nA>Train groping is drastically underreported in Japan.
And I'm not just making assumptions about Egypt, either. It's only relevant insofar as it's an example of how unreliable reported rape statistics are.
And I have said before, there is under-reporting in both Japan and America, you can't only consider under-reporting in Japan, that's cooking the books.
SOMETHING can be gleaned from this: to spite the extreme pornographic fiction all signs point to Japan having a low crime rate across the board, including sexual crimes. This contradicts Ms Sarkeesian's spurious link between sexy adverts and passengers being molested.
I disagree. I'd be very pissed if someone were to make a game about beating up a well-meaning man. Women and men are both people.AnAutisticDog said:Meh, if it was about beating a man nobody would care.