You don't know much about art theory do you.Ranchcroutons said:I challenge the second to last sentence of this article. All games are art and ignorance of this only causes more confusion for people on the outside looking in.
Actually im an art student, so yeah.....you need to expand your notion of what is art. if you just decide something doesn't count as art then your just as bad as those who don't respect the dada movement. Whether certain games serve as good art is another questionGrungyMunchy said:You don't know much about art theory do you.Ranchcroutons said:I challenge the second to last sentence of this article. All games are art and ignorance of this only causes more confusion for people on the outside looking in.
The artistic value of an object isn't definable by its medium. So not every painting is art, not every piece of music is art, not every movie is art and not every videogame is art. Therefore you can't say that all games are art, because they're not.Ranchcroutons said:Actually im an art student, so yeah.....you need to expand your notion of what is art. if you just decide something doesn't count as art then your just as bad as those who don't respect the dada movement. Whether certain games serve as good art is another questionGrungyMunchy said:You don't know much about art theory do you.Ranchcroutons said:I challenge the second to last sentence of this article. All games are art and ignorance of this only causes more confusion for people on the outside looking in.
Says you. There are many who would agree that every painting is a work of art and to me this expands to all media. Like I said there is good art and bad art but saying that something doesn't even qualify is disrespectful to the creatorsGrungyMunchy said:The artistic value of an object isn't definable by its medium. So not every painting is art, not every piece of music is art, not every movie is art and not every videogame is art. Therefore you can't say that all games are art, because they're not.Ranchcroutons said:Actually im an art student, so yeah.....you need to expand your notion of what is art. if you just decide something doesn't count as art then your just as bad as those who don't respect the dada movement. Whether certain games serve as good art is another questionGrungyMunchy said:You don't know much about art theory do you.Ranchcroutons said:I challenge the second to last sentence of this article. All games are art and ignorance of this only causes more confusion for people on the outside looking in.
But the organization doesn't support the industry, or even indie developers; it supports and funds non-profit artists why create public pieces that have a strict social value. All that has changed is that those non-profit, pro-social artistic pieces can now also be games. Even if it became the most beautiful artistic piece in the world, CoD, nor Minecraft, nor even something like Braid would ever, ever get funding from this. That's just what Fox very stupidly assumes.Jetsetneo said:Read this article. Watched the video.
This article seemed to be just as biased as the supposed video.
Heres the thing: It wasn't so much as 'Games aren't Art' so much as it was 'Games shouldn't be funded by the Gov't when there are better things we can do with our money'. I can agree with the latter.
The radio host admittedly wasn't very educated on the industry, and the moderator's opening statements about 'Should the gov't pay money for call of duty' are most certainly outlandish. That said, there's kinda a point to it.
Games are art. Thats my opinion.
However to a point I agree: We shouldn't cut 'legitimate' business to help an industry that is growing plenty on its own, especially where lack of cash for indy developers isn't a problem. Or at least its slowly become less of a problem.
So basically, theres more being blown outta proportion here than just the news video itself. In addition, does this really effect the average reader of this site? Unless you ALL are indy developers this commentary will not effect you. Nor will it effect the average Fox News viewer.
I sincerely doubt someone saw that and immediately phoned their local senator to try and change said bill.
dude....what the hell is wrong with you?arc1991 said:Anyone fancy helping me blow up the Fox News building?
*Grabs Shotgun and C4 charges*
First off, I'm in England, i can hardly do anything even if i wanted 2...Dorian6 said:dude....what the hell is wrong with you?arc1991 said:Anyone fancy helping me blow up the Fox News building?
*Grabs Shotgun and C4 charges*
How exactly will that help our cause?
How will that show that people who play games are mature, sensible human beings?
Right now FOX sees us as a bunch of violent, anti-social shut-ins, who's first response to every taunt is violence.
You're playing right into their hands. That's how they work. They say misleading, ignorant things to incite an outraged response, and right when someone makes a threat, or takes violent action, they go on the defensive and portray themselves as the victims. It's exactly what they did with Prop 8 in California, spouting lies and misinformation, and when the proposition passed, and otherwise reasonable people were protesting in the streets, FOX sits back and says "Look, we were right, they gays are a bunch of violent, evil, sinners who are angry that the lord won this round."
Great job dude
How so, its not even making a point. Its just point out fox news in being idiotic. "You guys are biased too" is Fox's tagline defense and its BS.Purple Shrimp said:i know you guys aren't going to get anything get in the way of your fervent hatred of Fox News but the article in the OP is also unbelievably biased