Even for Fox this is disappointing. Man, now I need to find something to get this icky sad feeling out of my system.
Or ma-bey for games like games like Imagination is the only escape http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagination_Is_the_Only_Escape, educational games of the like that usually don't make alot of money so publishers don't pick them up. Their are many educational games that could be interesting but are never picked up because they don't make enough money for the publisher because educational games don't sell well. These are small publishers with not alot of capital, you know as much about this as fox news does.CosmicCommander said:Because many devs are too lazy to make up the funds themselves, and so push it on everyone else to fork out on their behalf.Ukomba said:Why do video games need government money at all?
Oh...a joke...yes, obviously.arc1991 said:Anyone fancy helping me blow up the Fox News building?
*Grabs Shotgun and C4 charges*
(For people with no sense of humour, this was a joke -.-)
Tehehehe i'm glad the Majority of this thread have a sense of humour.Imp Emissary said:Oh...a joke...yes, obviously.arc1991 said:Anyone fancy helping me blow up the Fox News building?
*Grabs Shotgun and C4 charges*
(For people with no sense of humour, this was a joke -.-)
*Puts down RPG*
Completely agree. Although I am never surprised when FOX news comes out with something inane, lacking logic or completely stupid anymore. Its inevitable as the fecking tide coming in.LiquidGrape said:Dear Fox News. I think I speak for all people of rational thinking and common sense when I say:
:[ Wait! They attacked the Games industry. To hell with the RPG!arc1991 said:Tehehehe i'm glad the Majority of this thread have a sense of humour.Imp Emissary said:Oh...a joke...yes, obviously.arc1991 said:Anyone fancy helping me blow up the Fox News building?
*Grabs Shotgun and C4 charges*
(For people with no sense of humour, this was a joke -.-)
*Puts down RPG*
Now pick up that RPG, were on a mission >.>
The intro oversexed the story by referencing "Call of Duty", and probably shouldn't have. But I agree it was pretty reasonable. One guy said "games qualify as art", the other said "art or not, we shouldn't be funding it", and the host was agnostic. They could have improved but it wasn't nearly as worthless and lopsided as this article itself.Ace IV said:They set up the debate so people could hear a different point of view. The dude from FNC never took a side, as good reporters don't. Stop blaming Fox for reporting the news in an honest wayZeroMachine said:They set up the debate so the guy opposing video games would ignore every point the other guy made. Fox is just as much at fault for this as that asshole radio guy.Ace IV said:Fox didn't do anything wrong, they had a debate. Your ire should be directed at the dude who was arguing against video games as art, not FNC itself.