At one point I remember the host saying, "And these games can receive ten to two hundred thousand dollars from the federal budget...why?" To which I went in my head, "...The same reason we fund books and paintings and movies." I know it was necessary for Ambrozy to be cordial and modest, as the defense of the argument, but come on, when the interviewer half-asses his questions the interviewee has to half-ass his answers to show what a farce the debate is.
I hate how the argument can apply to any medium of art. "Why should I be paying more taxes to support some guy to write a book?" Well good question, because you likely do not read, master inquisitor. But they'll never infringe on the established cultural heads because of a massive backlash from those communities, so they attack videogames instead. That sucks. The videogame industry gets pulled down a little, and the war on culture in America goes on for a little longer.
One day someone is going to ask, "What would you spend the taxpayers's money on?" To which, I assume, would be answered by the gaping of mouths, the touching of beards, and the furrowing of brows. Eventually there might be the answer of, "Making jobs, supporting the industry, et cetera." Good response to that: "How?" Best response to that: "How? Or do you expect to burn a patch of money in sacrifice to the great god Pele in order for him to increase our prosperity?" Anyway I am irrationally angry now, so...no point in going on.