I guess so. He alsoVanilla Ice is a MAGA type? Huh.
I guess so. He alsoVanilla Ice is a MAGA type? Huh.
When the biggest musical act you can pull for your New Year's Eve event is Robbie Van Winkle.
Guess Kid Rock and Ted Nugent were too busy.
Far from being a conspiracy, it's the conclusion of your own government and numerous law agencies.How has the far right infiltrated the military and police? This is like conspiracy theory tin-hat shit you're going on about.
There is always a tendency who do like certain ideas about law&order or about strong macho men with weapons defending their community to be drawn to police and military.Far from being a conspiracy, it's the conclusion of your own government and numerous law agencies.
There's quite a difference between military and police personnel being involved in terrorism and the far-right actually infiltrating these departments like say Hydra. Of course, police and military personnel will be involved in domestic terrorism at a higher clip than normal because those are the professions that have the knowledge to plan and execute terrorism. If the far-right was infiltrating the departments like the police, then why did the FBI massively and disproportionately go after January 6th participants vs the BLM participants? Wouldn't the far-right infiltrating these departments result in the opposite happening or is this just part of the far-right's long con?Far from being a conspiracy, it's the conclusion of your own government and numerous law agencies.
The Military, Police, and the Rise of Terrorism in the United States
Amid growing concern about extremism in the ranks, new CSIS data show that U.S. military and law enforcement personnel have been involved in a growing number of domestic terrorist plots and attacks—though they have also increasingly been targeted by extremists.www.csis.org
they didn't.why did the FBI massively and disproportionately go after January 6th participants vs the BLM participants?
Assuming you're talking about US policies, those responsible would be either the far-right Republican Party, or the somewhat less right-wing but still right-wing Democratic Party.And who is responsible for all the new crime policies that don't actually punish criminals that are increasing crime?
Everyone else is noting that there are reports, including from governments, the military and law enforcement agencies themselves, that there is a persistent trend for the far right to either try to gain recruitment into the police and military, or to recruit serving and ex-service personnel into far right ideology. As most police and military organisations do not permit ideological extremism in their ranks, far right members of these services do so by concealing or lying about their beliefs. This meets the definition of infiltration.There's quite a difference between military and police personnel being involved in terrorism and the far-right actually infiltrating these departments like say Hydra.
Nope, the democrats that push this through are far more left than even the average left citizen (the citizens don't want this). It's like how black communities didn't actually want defund the police but everyone else keep forcing it on them and how much better everything would be.Assuming you're talking about US policies, those responsible would be either the far-right Republican Party, or the somewhat less right-wing but still right-wing Democratic Party.
Am I to make from this post (where this argument string came from) that Terminal is just talking about the occasional far right person becoming a cop by not telling the cops they are far right or actually infiltrating the police department to move it towards a more right ideology? I obviously interpreted it as the latter. Who doesn't hide their skeletons on a job interview? How is this some news that people that are far right (or any type of extreme) don't say that they are in a job interview? And if I was trying to plan and execute some kind of attack, I would be looking to recruit people that know how to do it and those people would be police and military obviously. You guys are acting like this is some smoking gun or something, it's just general common sense and basic logic.Everyone else is noting that there are reports, including from governments, the military and law enforcement agencies themselves, that there is a persistent trend for the far right to either try to gain recruitment into the police and military, or to recruit serving and ex-service personnel into far right ideology. As most police and military organisations do not permit ideological extremism in their ranks, far right members of these services do so by concealing or lying about their beliefs. This meets the definition of infiltration.
No-one is claiming this is a centrally co-ordinated, systematic suberversion of law agencies and the military by a massive, singular, crime syndicate like in a comic book. That is just your straw man and trivialisation of the issue.
The far left doesn't intentionally infiltrate police departments and the military. The far left does not seek to influence or usurp the political system. The far left do not organize paramilitary training camps to learn how to conduct armed terrorism.
Are you using "far left" just as a synonym for "did things I disagree with"?Nope, the democrats that push this through are far more left than even the average left citizen (the citizens don't want this). It's like how black communities didn't actually want defund the police but everyone else keep forcing it on them and how much better everything would be.
It varies. Fundamentally, the far right tends to have a strong attraction to imposing order by force.Am I to make from this post (where this argument string came from) that Terminal is just talking about the occasional far right person becoming a cop by not telling the cops they are far right or actually infiltrating the police department to move it towards a more right ideology? I obviously interpreted it as the latter.
Because one tried doing a coup and the other didn't. And ''massive and disproportionate'' isn't exactly the phrase I'd use. For treason most seem to have gotten off pretty light.then why did the FBI massively and disproportionately go after January 6th participants vs the BLM
US marshals assassinated Michael Reinoehl in broad daylight.Then why'd the FBI arrest Siaka Massaquoi?
I know it shouldn't seem bizarre that attempting a coup isn't seen as a big deal, and yet...Because one tried doing a coup and the other didn't.
In the context of volatility due to the Middle East's current ongoing conflicts, I think "extremely dangerous" is a better descriptor than "ironic".The murderous general's funeral gets more people murdered. Isn't that ironic?
Nope, a policy left of what the average left citizen is OK with is far left.Are you using "far left" just as a synonym for "did things I disagree with"?
How do you think you get to socialism or communism? It rhymes with horse.It varies. Fundamentally, the far right tends to have a strong attraction to imposing order by force.
Some far right individuals will join because they have a hard-on for violence, authority, and the ability to impose their vision of order on others. After that, there are myriad groups who may have varying objectives in encouraging membership in police / military. Some may merely want to accrue personal military and paramilitary skills to then bring back to their groups. Some are however interested in spreading their ideology and recruiting people with training in violence into the far right, because they are attracted to the imposition of their view of social order by force. Often accompanied by apcalyptic notions that race war / civil war / communist revolution is imminent: which they intend to win.