And that is not what a vaccine was understood to be.
People aren't posting this garbage to get "the woke people" upset. They're posting it because they mean it. And you're trying to get us to ignore it because you want them to get what they're after- a world of people who look, talk, and think the exact same way you do.
At core, it thrives because people believe in it, not because people oppose it.
By that argument the most common scenario in which a rabies vaccine is administered to humans (after potential exposure but before the disease has reached the brain) is not a vaccine at all but "just a treatment" (of an otherwise untreatable disease, no less). And yes, I agree with you that that person already had cancer but the use of mRNA vaccines in cancer patients isn't just that it helps treat cancer, but it helps prevent the cancer from coming back over time by teaching the immune system to identify and destroy any recurrence.
Sure, but there you're talking about a latent period before someone actually has rabies.
It's not an insult.You are so bad at trying to come up with insults, try workshoppping them for a few days instead of giving in to this trite kneejerk emotional defense mechanism of yours each time - the results will be noticeable within the next 5 or so attempts I garuntee!
The people getting upset are the objects of the hate. There are plenty of echo-chambers to play in, things like this are on Twitter for a reason.
I was, you replied to that and brought up the film analogy. So I was talking games originally.
Oh no plenty of been woke. See the series they've been making where historical English Queens are black in the or trying to portray the past as some society far more racially diverse and accepting than todays society.
Disney is woke by the James Gunn example alone. Woke for me is basically just trying to look good (with social issues) without actually caring and doing it for the brownie points.
Does it though? Also, you can find this type of vagueness in most bills. You're just pointing it out in this bill because you don't like the bill.
Dude isn't insulting you fam.You are so bad at trying to come up with insults, try workshoppping them for a few days instead of giving in to this trite kneejerk emotional defense mechanism of yours each time - the results will be noticeable within the next 5 or so attempts I garuntee!
Oh dwarvenhobble, not again you poor soul. I'm sorry you've spent too long in the sauce, incapable of interpretating anything outside of petty culture war memes and gossamer thin gotchas. This path won't provide you contentment or happiness, it has no solutions for you, only self-induced suffering, whipping you into states more madder and madder and confused with no end point, cause that's what it's designed to do. Lashing out online wherever you can is all you got, defending obvious predators and scammers, wasting so much energy on chasing your own tail. I hope for your family's sake you can eventually find a way out of this spiral.
So all you've got now is "other bills do it too"?
Pro-tip: Under current US copyright law, it's also legally ok to steal AI art.
Firstly, overall, a lot of the aim of this sort of posting is to make one's own side upset. The alternative to making the other "upset" is to promote alarm, fear, anger in one's own, or incite derision and contempt from them towards the other. Although individual items might sway one way or the other, overall they are different sides of the same coin, and I doubt you would find many who employ one and not the other. The generation of emotion to attract attention and carry a message thus works to both rally friends and fray the enemy.
Oh we're going with the spiritual stuff.
I also asked "but does it though?" Because I don't think it would. Have not read many bills? They are all vague in some way unless the nature of it is already super specific like saying driving over the speed limit. I mentioned how making a bill to make it illegal to lure kids into cars/buildings will be vague but you guys are fine with outlawing luring kids so you don't get on your soapbox over that.
If that's your idea of being "nice and jovial, then you failed harder than usual.
Way too late for that. You've done that far more times and you bother even count.
Quickly looked up the Missouri statute on child abduction for a direct comparison.
Stealing something is pretty cut and dry, even more so when the thing in question has governmental papers saying who owns it. Yes, I know kids aren't owned but it's the same thing as stealing like a car in essence as far as the law is concerned.Quickly looked up the Missouri statute on child abduction for a direct comparison.
It's much, much more specific and detailed on what constitutes an offence.
What like when you force a person to be in a position that doesn't suit them solely based on skin tone, you get Scarlet Johansson in Ghost of the Shell?
