SBF Planned to ‘Come Out As Republican’ With Tucker Carlson
“Come out against the woke agenda” are actual words in a note the crypto fraud wrote to himself.
nymag.com
Funny events in anti-woke world
- Thread starter Agema
- Start date
nymag.com
I can see no way that this could be easily abused
Missouri law prevents divorce during pregnancy – even in cases of violence
The statute, which can lead to reproductive coercion in a state that has banned abortion, has recently gained nationwide attentionwww.theguardian.com
/s
I think it's in regards to Asmongold and him being on an anti-woke spiel in recent years.
This has been one of my favorite dumb things to watch make the rounds in recent memory. There is no law in Missouri that says pregnant women can't get divorced. There are a handful of states that actually have that law, Missouri is not one of them (California is), all it has is a statute requiring pregnancy status on divorce filings. Why? Because there is a longstanding, widespread practice (even in places without any such law) of not finalizing a divorce until after the child is born, because if you do you have to go back to court a second time to reconsider custody and child support. So rather than make a recently divorced single mother drag an abuser back to court to establish terms of child support, they put a pin in it and wait until the child is born and parental obligations are legally established for the father.Missouri law prevents divorce during pregnancy – even in cases of violence
The statute, which can lead to reproductive coercion in a state that has banned abortion, has recently gained nationwide attention
For reference, fact check:
Posts Distort Missouri Divorce Law Regarding Pregnancy - FactCheck.org
There's no law in Missouri that prevents pregnant women from getting divorced. But social media posts claim Missouri women "cannot divorce their spouse if they are pregnant." Legal experts told us a judge may wait to finalize a divorce until after a baby is born to determine custody and other...
www.factcheck.org
And a less blatantly biased news organization making the same mistakes:
Pregnant women can’t get divorced in Missouri. Here’s why
Missouri is one of four states that does not let couples finalize a divorce if the wife is pregnant.
thehill.com
This is funny to me in 3 ways:
1) The abuse of phrasing: if instead of headlines like "Pregnant Women Can't Get Divorced....", they said "Men Can't Divorce Their Pregnant Wives...", none of the people riled up about this would care. Anything you can phrase as an issue of women's rights, even if the law is predominantly used to restrain men, is instant internet rage bait.
2) The political dishonesty: the law does not do what they say it does in Missouri, but the law as they describe it actually exists in California. But those articles list Missouri, Texas, Arkansas, and Arizona: blatantly only Republican controlled states. And the inspiration for these news stories is a Democratic politician presenting a bill to change Missouri law. The obvious shilling for Democrats and demonizing of Republicans is laughably on the nose.
3) The laws they're complaining about are only there because we refuse to legally treat the unborn as people. We wouldn't have to wait for birth to establish custody and support obligations if it wouldn't get in the way of abortion.
Could you give a source on the underlined part?
The rest of this quote all contains information that the Guardian article covered in the linked article, hence I fail to see how the Guardian is making any "mistakes".
I suppose I can repost the same source about Missouri:
Posts Distort Missouri Divorce Law Regarding Pregnancy - FactCheck.org
There's no law in Missouri that prevents pregnant women from getting divorced. But social media posts claim Missouri women "cannot divorce their spouse if they are pregnant." Legal experts told us a judge may wait to finalize a divorce until after a baby is born to determine custody and other...
www.factcheck.org
And a source for California:
California Laws on Pregnancy and Divorce
If you’re pregnant and want to get divorced, you may have to wait in California. Learn your options for ending your marriage while pregnant.
violaw.com
is a tad validating to see long-held suspiciouns confirmed by ppl just too dumb to hide them properlyI mean, if you're all about that grift, might as wel go for the easiest marksSBF Planned to ‘Come Out As Republican’ With Tucker Carlson
“Come out against the woke agenda” are actual words in a note the crypto fraud wrote to himself.
🤌
Fuck Asmongold, you bandwagon jumper and fake ass DMC and Capcom fan. Capcom, why bring this shit head or board? You could've picked so many other better options!
I like the fact that SBF didn't even spell Carlson's name right.I mean, if you're all about that grift, might as wel go for the easiest marksSBF Planned to ‘Come Out As Republican’ With Tucker Carlson
“Come out against the woke agenda” are actual words in a note the crypto fraud wrote to himself.
Huh, I only know the little turd from all the irritants repeating his opinion ad nauseum about WoW on their forums. Is this likely to make him just, go away?
Tucker Carlson tricked by YouTubers into interviewing fake Kate Middleton expert
YouTube pranksters Josh & Archie claim to have pulled one over on Tucker Carlson, pretending to be the source of that infamous Kate Middleton photo
www.avclub.com
The funny thing is everyone is loving this
Stellar Blade’s Sexiest Outfit Comes With Deadly Consequences
Eve's viral ‘Skin Suit’ enables a hard mode of sortskotaku.com
"Wait so the game gets harder for wearing this outfit not just my dick? Brilliant".
The people who are the target audience of this game tend to also like difficult titles lol
But that's literally what you just did lol.
You even had to google who I was on about, assuming you even did bother googling and find out lol
Yet there was no name recognition in those hired for other race swaps for the most part (I'll give you Halle Bailey as the exception)
It would, shame your don't tend to bring any or when you do it's misrepresented or just outright wrong when placed into actual context for your arguments
"You abandoned us"
says the side that threw me under the proverbial bus, deleted 300+ articles I'd written for them (for free BTW) , kicked me out of communities I'd been in for 5 to 10 years with people I'd come to consider friends (many of whom I still talk to other places) and labelled me as a dangerous threat along with multiple doxing attempts, and false reporting me on a number of services to try and get me banned (which BTW was a pain in the arse to deal wit).
I didn't abandon anyone, I refused to join a fucking cult that hates person freedom and liberty and demands total conformity.
As I've said to others before, you will be under the wheels sooner or later like me and have people demanding you walk back over and fall in line again.
Yes and no.
Considering how the definition of a conservative has shifted so much it entirely depends on what you mean by it. Bible thumpers? No thanks. People who say "Maybe having an 8 year old boy doing Drag Burlesque shows in gay clubs isn't something we should be in favour of"? Yeh I'll side with them as rational people who should be on top, it's just a weird state of being that stuff like that and "Maybe we should vet people working with children for being sex offenders" are positions being deemed conservative now.
Says the person who has loudly declared how he is ignoring me and doesn't pay attention to anything I post.
You really want to talk about scales of failure?
OK then lets.
Like that time you wanted Teens girls thrown in jail based purely on online speculation?
Don't be sexist now.
You wouldn't like it because equal standards would likely hit a lot of people whom you'd see as on your side.
He wasn't though, just a lot of people online saying they wanted him to or he should.
Also Bond are established IP in the film world so aren't as needing of name recognition.
Didn't they change a lot of The Spirit and make that character not a Nazi in it? (been a while since I watched it).
Also guys fighting vs long shot of women posing heroically. Bit of a difference.
More self aware joke seeing as due to changes in the show compared to the comics they ended up with only the 3 non evil women characters having the kind of powers to actually fight Stormfront
So where did the money go in the "We'll try to make everything for everyone" space?
Actual demographically aimed content does better then attempting mass appeal slop unless your name is Michael Bay and even then those are getting diminishing returns.
Yet I can call "Babes with Blades" (literally keeps being recommended to me on Amazon prime) or any other crappy B -movie shit and no-one will bat an eye lid or go to bat for them.
Say Charlies Angels 2nd reboot is bad and you're a sexist who hates woman. say Ghostbuster 2016 looks bad and you're some dangerous Incel.
No I said it's a bad idea they do try to generalise everything.........Yeh not every movie etc is made for me, I'd like some to try though, and not end up accuse of being Nazi propaganda like The Northman was.
So why was a Brazilian guy not linking the works connected to Sweet Baby inc warranting of him losing his whole steam account?
People are not allowing others to not like things now lol.
Actually it started in November, by 4 chan and the Brazilian dude in question heard about it and was inspired to make the curator.
So if this was Kiwifarms plan can I just ask.
Is the Sweet Baby Inc staffer who tried to get a Brazilian dudes steam library removed from him a kiwi farms agent?
How about the journalist who then covered the curator as a harassment campaign and ignore what caused this curator to blow up, are they Kiwifarms plans?
How about the people on social media running to denounce "The Gamers™" and this list as the worst abuse ever while ignoring the actual attempted targeted harassment done by Sweet Baby Inc staff, are they Kiwi farms agents?
No?
Guess I'm not the one who fell for it seeing as I opposed those things, or am I some secret Kiwifarms agent in your belief?
Seeing as this it technically not the banned event that can't be talked about as it happened before who knows. But also Burgers and Fries was a 4chan IRC not a Kiwifarms thing, there are cross over I'm sure but rather important correction.
Also it's really only been one side using doxing to start with and because I can talk about this aspect as it's not the banned topic. Bearing, Thunderf00t, Sargon (multiple times), Tucker Carlson, all were doxed to try and cancel them. How is it suddenly the anti-woke side to blame for this again?vvv[/QUOTE]