Or just the copay like any other drug.
Yet we know for a fact that they can end up paying hundreds. So no, not just the copay.
But the people that can't afford are not paying for it obviously. My point is who is paying the prices you claimed that ozempic cost (8k/year)? It's really just probably state insurers that can't negotiate and the few people rich enough to afford it where their insurance doesn't cover it.
That's right, they're not paying for it. They're being denied medication they need instead.
8k per year was one estimate for the cost
to insurers. The cost to an uninsured individual, or one whose insurance does not cover Ozempic (so 20% of insurers for diabetes, and 50+% of insurers for obesity) can reach over 1k per month.
They are pushing for ozempic to be used long-term, which doesn't make sense when you can simply eat properly. If anything, ozempic should just be used as a tool to help people eat properly as it could be used to get people off the cycle of carb addiction easier and make those first few weeks to a month of a healthy diet a lot easier by requiring a lot less willpower. The same thing is essentially true for diabetes but that would be a longer period of use. Long-term use of ozempic really makes no sense for either weight loss or diabetes. Part of the horrible healthcare system in the US is treating symptoms with drugs vs actually going after the root cause and fixing that. That would result in healthcare being cheaper for everyone.
I really have zero interest in your amateur opinions on healthcare. Need should be determined by medical experts. Currently it is dictated instead by businessmen with a profit motive to overcharge (manufacturers) and to deny coverage (insurers).
But like no one is paying the prices for ozempic that you claimed they were. If they were, then their profit margin would be much higher.
No, only someone with zero comprehension of pricing structures and business margins would think this.