Only if you do it professionally. Domestically, cooking is the woman's job. Being a chef is for men.
Funny events in anti-woke world
- Thread starter Agema
- Start date
Oh, I see now. You think she's the b****.No, he is. He was describing himself as a b****. He's making fun of himself in that recording. Take a listen quick:
Hear the tone, pay attention to the context and the language. "I tried", "I failed", "I'll admit it", "I took her furniture shopping" "like a b****" "and I couldn't get there".
I mean.... I can sort of see how it could be referring to himself.
But is that really in keeping with how Trump talks about himself and others? He's not exactly known for his humility and self-deprecation; he's already talking about the woman disrespectfully. And him being the "b****" doesn't make much sense in that context-- in that sort of macho talk, a "b****" (when describing a man) is cowardly, passive, or feminine, which is the opposite of how he's describing his own behaviour.
Yes, that is in keeping with how he talks about himself, he is actually known for his self-deprecation:
Trump pokes fun at himself. Why do only some people see it?
His self-aware sense of humor is a powerful weapon. If you can spot the joke.
www.politico.eu
It makes perfect sense in that context. He wanted to have sex with a woman, so he went furniture shopping with her and then never got the sexual encounter to happen. He's calling himself passive and feminine. He's so manly! He'd hold an uninterested woman's bag while she tests out sofas!
Even when he describes "just start kissing, don't even wait" he describes it as "automatic, like a magnet". He puts himself in passing terms, that he's not the one in control, that he is weak to the power of these women. And just in case you thought he might be describing himself as some macho "I take what I want" kinda guy there, he interjects with the "they let you". The entire tape, front to back, is about Trump being powerless to women.
That's not "in the absence of any other information", because by specifying you and Silvanus, you are giving me a substantial amount of additional information.
Sure is. First time I cooked for my partner got me laid (not really, but she once joke about it). Is sex with a woman still manly? Last time i checked it was, but I sometimes get confused these days with the way these blokes only seem to care about the admiration, respect and love of other men.
Makes perfect sense why they can't cook then, neither professionally as men do, or domestically as women do. Because they are neither. They are boys. And boys both want and need a mommy to take care of them. Or to be more vulgar yet precise, a bang maid (which they might also call mommy).
There's a fair point in that article. I do think that media outlets will overreact to comments that clearly aren't supposed to be taken seriously (the Medal of Honour example cited in there is a prime example). But very little of what that article describes is actually self-deprecation; mostly it's just simple exaggeration for effect.Yes, that is in keeping with how he talks about himself, he is actually known for his self-deprecation:
Trump pokes fun at himself. Why do only some people see it?
His self-aware sense of humor is a powerful weapon. If you can spot the joke.
"They let you", right after saying that he doesn't wait, is absolutely in line with the "macho"/"take what I want" image he's trying to convey-- he's boasting that he can do whatever he wants and women are fine with it because he's rich and powerful. Misogynists will often boast that women fawn over them, regardless of the truth; it feeds the macho delusion. Look at Andrew Tate. Hell, look at Johnny Bravo.
I'm quite sure you can see that grabbing someone by the genitals without waiting for a word from them is about the most aggressively active one can get. Calling that passive behaviour because nobody stopped him is one hell of a stretch.
Because he's full of shit. None of these freaks actually practice what they preach. Just like how trans porn is actually one of the most popular search results in red states.
Possibly because enough people - specifically, women - agree with or tolerate those views.
After all, a substantial number of these fucknuts turn out to be married. They might be lying, but they might also have also found a woman willing to pay appropriate subservience (or ground her down into accepting her fate).
Right, and by specifying her and Trump, there is also information, or in this case a lack thereof. You'd expect there to be evidence of the opportunity for the crime, and as we aren't in the same place, it's logically valid to conclude he didn't assault me. If we could validate that they were in that store at the same time, the bare minimum to establish the opportunity, and then she accused him of rape, now you've gotten to a 50/50.
There is no physical evidence a crime was committed, no date to validate if he was in the store or even the city, no witness that Trump had the opportunity, no concrete explanation for why the store's barriers to such an opportunity (staff presence, door locks) would all be absent at the same time, and the only others who can testify on her behalf say that she described a sexual encounter with Donald Trump ("you won't believe what just happened to me") and they told her that she was raped. That is a substantial amount of information.
Like, if someone was accused of stealing $50 from a tip jar when nobody was looking, you might start at 50/50. If someone is accused of stealing $50 from a locked room with a hired attendant, you're not going to start at a coin flip.
You're trying to make some of him comments fit in line with the "macho"/"take what I want" image, because you believe that's what he was trying to convey. Set that belief aside, listen to it fresh: does anything in his tone sound like he's trying to sound macho? Do the words he uses seem intended to be manly? If you take that one word, b****, and apply it to Trump rather than the woman, he says sexualized things about women, but no he-man woman haters club material. He sounds absolutely nothing like Andrew Tate. Johnny Bravo, sure, but Johnny Bravo is a punchline that is obsessed with women and constantly emasculated for it. Nobody wanting to be macho acts like that. If he was acting like Austin Powers, you wouldn't accuse him of thinking he's James Bond.
Andrew Tate has said it's gay for men to have sex with women for pleasure, and that men should have sex with each other (he specifies oral or handjobs) to defeat the LGBT agenda.
I'm not making that up.
I'm still confused how Andrew Tate became someone that anyone gives a shit about in the first place.
Commonplace circumstances do not require additional concrete explanations.
Unlocked, unobserved room, with the person being a serial thief, who then refuses to let you check his pocket.
His tone just generally sounds lighthearted. Devoid of context and content, I could hear that tone coming from someone making fun of himself, and I could also see it coming from someone belittling others or boasting.
In terms of content, and ignoring the 'b****' comment-- yes, some of the rest of it strikes me as aggressively misogynist. I don't see how anyone could honestly hear the "grab by the p*ssy" comment any other way.
Then of course, we have all the rest of the context, from his long and ignoble history of misogyny, bravado, and sexualisation. It would be entirely in keeping with that for him to call her a b****. That's how he sees women.
Because he's a giant piece of shit who spread the message about how awesome it is to be a giant piece of shit - something which appears very en vogue with the spiteful male internet generation.
Now bet you how many of those dumb ass young men and men are gonna actually go out and do what he just said and try to justify it not being gay? Tate is all talk and a whiny shit?
Can you finish prosecuting this guy already Romania and be done with it? There's literally nothing left at this point.
What to Know About the Accusations Against Andrew Tate
The antagonistic online influencer, who is facing charges in two separate cases, was placed under house arrest. His home was raided in August over more accusations.
*snort* I realize you meant it metaphorically but I at first read it literally:
"Why isn't he starved?"
"Because he does not go to the toilet that often, letting the waste remain in his system, thereby filling out his body and not feeling as much hunger."
I'm quite certain he says worse things more often than he does about women. I think if asked for an example of him being rude to women as a class of people, that tape would be the only example to immediately come to mind.
The incel crowd will throw a lot of money at someone who tells them how downtrodden they are by "evil modern civilization" rather than give them the truth (that they are absolutely horrible people by their own choice and women avoid them because of it).