Some very Putin-esque logic there. Someone might conceivably annex them --> we must stop that happening by annexing them.Yeah, have to annex Greenland to stop people from...annexing Canada?
To add the context....I thought it was even worse than that - he literally was in the kremlin at the time meeting with Putin.
[h2]Elon Takes a Swing, Assassin's Creed Swings Back Hard[/h2]
That's when Elon Musk jumped in. In two separate posts, Musk called Hasan a "fraud" and said he was promoting a "terrible game just for the money." Harsh words, especially from someone with over 200 million followers.
But then, the Assassin's Creed social media team fired back, and they didn't miss. Replying directly to Musk, they wrote:
"Is that what the guy playing your Path of Exile 2 account told you?"
The post quickly exploded, racking up nearly a hundred thousand likes and over two million views (at the time of writing) in just two hours. Many people online saw it as a brutal and hilarious jab at Musk, calling out the idea that he might not actually play the games he talks about.
AD
Image: X
Later, when Grummz posted a screenshot from an article claiming Assassin's Creed Shadows isn't the hit Ubisoft "desperately needs," the account replied again: "Our game is out."
AD
Short and cold, just the way internet clapbacks usually hit hardest. This whole thing follows recent headlines showing Assassin's Creed Shadows had a strong launch, with 2 million players in two days after launch. While some analysts say it's not tracking as high as Valhalla or other major releases, the online conversation seems to be just as focused on the people arguing about the game as the game itself.
The jab about Path of Exile 2 isn't random either, it's a reference to Elon Musk's earlier controversy where he admitted to using account boosting services to stay competitive in games like Path of Exile 2 and Diablo IV.
Image: X
AD
After initially denying the claims, Musk later said it was necessary to keep up with hardcore players, especially those in Asia. So when the Assassin's Creed account asked if it was "the guy playing your Path of Exile 2 account" who told him the game was bad, it was a cheeky nod to that drama, and a pretty deep cut.
I can't wait for them to start yelling to prosecute him. In the shitshow of a senate hearing they were asked directly if the journalist would face legal issues if he released everything they sent him. Glad he called their bluff.So. We have a new article, and new details.
Tulsi Gabbard, under oath: ""I can attest to the fact that there were not classified or intelligence equities that were included in that chat group at any time."
Michael Waltz on social media: "No locations. No sources & methods. NO WAR PLANS".
Pete Hegseth yesterday: "Nobody was texting war plans”.
And now we have this....
View attachment 12998
So. They definitively, provably lied about the content. Gabbard did so under oath.
Or, the effort to organise murder via an app that destroys the messages/evidence, rather than leaving a paper trail of these things as the law requires. Or the spectacularly cavalier attitude towards said murder.the problem is not the conspiracy to commit murder, it's the leak about the conspiracy to commit murder
Personally I consider the problem how they use the situation to vent their sheer hatred of Europe while one one those total freaks is literally in the government building of the country they plan to team up with to do us harm.the problem is not the conspiracy to commit murder, it's the leak about the conspiracy to commit murder
So 12 people out of 748 called Obama a dictator?
Don't even fucking go there, the US is no where fucking close to Nazi Germany even if you remove the Holocaust and taking over of other countries. Stop using such hyperbole, this is why your side keeps losing people to the other side.As for Adolf. I suspect your view might be colored by a rather juvenile view of Hitler as some sort of demonic entity that magically came to power in 1940 to start a war, rather than a real life politician with real life policies that had a real life effect on the country he was leading. When people make the Adolf argument they don't typically refer to the idea Trump might invade Poland and round up all the jews. They likely refer more to the transformation from Weimar to the facist hellhole of Nazi Germany. And if Trump deliberately decided to run as a demagogue with an anti democratic message he has only himself to blame when people notice similarities with other anti democratic demagogues.
The FBI investigated him for like 3 years and arrested him for nothing. What evidence? He wasn't guilty of anything.Oh, right. So someone who was arrested and charged with a misdemeanour (for which there is video evidence of trespass), held for 1 night and then released on 1k bail. And you believe that's worse than someone being arrested and detained for two weeks without charge or accusation of any misdemeanour or crime, solely because the former is a US citizen?
* Zero evidence that they were 'illegals';
* I then provided you with three more examples of legal residents detained, including for 12 days.
Uh-huh, but I'm not using the terms "fascist" or "dictator", so stop waffling about this nonsense. I've directly addressed your questions. Yes, ICE targets people who aren't illegal immigrants. Yes, multiple people who're fully legal residents, without any suspected crime or misdemeanour, have been targeted by law enforcement for lengthy detention. Those are the things you asked about and I've directly addressed them.
Nobody I know actually has it but here's a link to it on BGG:Was there an actual Trump promo card? What came with the Kickstarter fancy wooden box set was a set of decals to convert your game from Secret Hitler to Secret Trump.
Now you're making me wish I could play Secret Hitler more often, but it takes a lot of people to have a decent game. 10 player Secret Hitler is fun though.
I'm merely explaining the thought process, and point out that Trump knowingly invites such comparisons. Personally I would rather compare him with Putin and Orban because they are closer to Trump on the spectrum. But all of them knowingly operate on a spectrum on which the extreme ends sits Adolf. They share a spectrum with him by choice, and thus lose the right to get offended by such comparisons.Don't even fucking go there, the US is no where fucking close to Nazi Germany even if you remove the Holocaust and taking over of other countries. Stop using such hyperbole, this is why your side keeps losing people to the other side.
you don't need to tell me that you are a shallow and unserious person easily managed by those in power.Personally I consider the problem how they use the situation to vent their sheer hatred of Europe while one one those total freaks is literally in the government building of the country they plan to team up with to do us harm.
Fighting pirates itself much less so, though the civilian casulties we know a Trump administration would do nothing to avoid certainly are a problem.
most of the mainstream criticism in the US has focused on the fact of the leak itself.Or, the effort to organise murder via an app that destroys the messages/evidence, rather than leaving a paper trail of these things as the law requires. Or the spectacularly cavalier attitude towards said murder.
And how did your shallow and seriousness conduct help the situation? Seems to me those in power expertly managed you into supporting an outcome directly opposing everything you claim to stand for.you don't need to tell me that you are a shallow and unserious person easily managed by those in power.
Why is the number important? Again, Trump is not the first president to face such accusations.So 12 people out of 748 called Obama a dictator?
Sounds like Trump and his cronies getting a taste of their own medicine to me. If they can throw around any wild accusation against their opposition, their opposition should be allowed to do the same.When the president of the US says democracy is under threat, it's much more than just some kooks saying it. Plus, it was a main message of the democratic party during the election. It's no different than when Trump said the election was rigged.
He was on tape trespassing. They released him after 1 night. How is this worse than 2 weeks with no reason given whatsoever, no charge, no nothing?The FBI investigated him for like 3 years and arrested him for nothing. What evidence? He wasn't guilty of anything.
Being detained is not evidence of crime. That's completely obtuse.ICE took them away, that's pretty high probability right there.
Cool, then maybe don't keep hurling that shite in responses to me.Then you can consider yourself as someone that I'm not referring to when I say something like 'ya'll keep using fascist and dictator for no reason'.
Everyone is on the same spectrum and thus all sit on the spectrum on the extreme end that sits Adolf and the extreme left as well.I'm merely explaining the thought process, and point out that Trump knowingly invites such comparisons. Personally I would rather compare him with Putin and Orban because they are closer to Trump on the spectrum. But all of them knowingly operate on a spectrum on which the extreme ends sits Adolf. They share a spectrum with him by choice, and thus lose the right to get offended by such comparisons.
Why is it suddenly the fault of everyone else that Trump knowingly runs as an anti democratic demagogue?
Because I'm talking about when a rather large group throw such claims around and it's common for the average person to say such things.Why is the number important? Again, Trump is not the first president to face such accusations.
Sounds like Trump and his cronies getting a taste of their own medicine to me. If they can throw around any wild accusation against their opposition, their opposition should be allowed to do the same.
They why wasn't he found guilty? The Biden administration specifically target individuals that oppose their party.He was on tape trespassing. They released him after 1 night. How is this worse than 2 weeks with no reason given whatsoever, no charge, no nothing?
Being detained is not evidence of crime. That's completely obtuse.
Cool, then maybe don't keep hurling that shite in responses to me.
Well, we know they're all psychopaths so it's to be expected.Or, the effort to organise murder via an app that destroys the messages/evidence, rather than leaving a paper trail of these things as the law requires. Or the spectacularly cavalier attitude towards said murder.
That's the only lie here, read the fucking wiki detailing all the evidence.Then, you can't claim your side is better because you didn't take the high road. Also, Trump didn't start it, he was hounded for 3 years over made up bullshit, RussiaGate, that was a massive lie.