Funny events in anti-woke world

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,675
6,874
118
Remember Hilary's emails? Cause I don't think anyone will after this.
Oh, they absolutely will remember Hilary's emails, because:

1) The Hilary emails form a stock "but both sides!" excuse for any security problem by the Republicans. Even if the Trump administration were directly texting US military secrets to Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin, the Republicans would defend them doing so with reference to Hilary's emails.

2) The sort of people who are still that hugely bothered by Clinton's emails won't even be reading the news of Hesgeth's indiscretions. The media they access won't tell them, or if they do, the media will bury the problem with a mass "but it's okay really" explanations. Thus those people will continue to believe that the Hilary emails were a particular scandal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,843
5,175
118
Plano, TX
Country
United States
Gender
Male
"I'm not gonna stand here, present some egghead scientific argument based on fact. I'm just a regular dude; I like to drink beer, y'know? I love my family; 'rock, flag, and eagle,' right, Charlie? You see, Charlie? These liberals are trying to assassinate my character. I can't change their mind; I won't change my mind, because I don't have to! Because I'm an American. I won't change my mind on anything, regardless of the facts that are set out before me. I'm dug in, and I'll never change."

Ronald McDonald (aka: "Mac"), It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia, S8:Ep.10, c. 2012
I know The Simpsons is famous for predicting shit well before it comes to fruition, but hats off to IASIP in this case. This was written as satire in 2012, satirizing a ridiculously moronic, ignorant, and stubborn mindset, but sadly, this might as well be the very real and unironic rantings of any MAGA cultist today, 13 years later.
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
17,288
10,033
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
I know The Simpsons is famous for predicting shit well before it comes to fruition, but hats off to IASIP in this case. This was written as satire in 2012, satirizing a ridiculously moronic, ignorant, and stubborn mindset, but sadly, this might as well be the very real and unironic rantings of any MAGA cultist today, 13 years later.
"The world will change to suit me, because I'm armed and ignorant" is a long-standing American mindset.

"It's shameful that they're using their show to attack half of America, when they should be using it to attack the other half of America."
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,443
5,269
118
"I'm not gonna stand here, present some egghead scientific argument based on fact. I'm just a regular dude; I like to drink beer, y'know? I love my family; 'rock, flag, and eagle,' right, Charlie? You see, Charlie? These liberals are trying to assassinate my character. I can't change their mind; I won't change my mind, because I don't have to! Because I'm an American. I won't change my mind on anything, regardless of the facts that are set out before me. I'm dug in, and I'll never change."

Ronald McDonald (aka: "Mac"), It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia, S8:Ep.10, c. 2012
I know The Simpsons is famous for predicting shit well before it comes to fruition, but hats off to IASIP in this case. This was written as satire in 2012, satirizing a ridiculously moronic, ignorant, and stubborn mindset, but sadly, this might as well be the very real and unironic rantings of any MAGA cultist today, 13 years later.
Well, being a snake oil salesmen in politics is about as old as politics (or snake oil), so it's not too hard to predict. Community did a similar thing in its poiltics episode, and that was in like 2011.



What happened with Trump getting elected (again) is as old as dirt, but we all thought people were reasonable enough now to not let it happen again. The early 00's sentiment that bigotry, and racism, and ant-semitism was pretty much over and relegated to only the far fringes of society really did a number on people. And now we're stuck with all the assholes who greedily took advantage of that in the highest positions of power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
17,288
10,033
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
The Lieutenant Governor of Indiana, officially the stupidest place on Earth, states that DEI is worse than the "Three-Fifths Compromise" which he argues "is not a pro-discrimination compromise".


He went on to argue that the Compromise was "designed to make sure that justice was equal for all people and equality really meant equality for all." Because, y'know, deciding that people of a particular skin color were only worth three-fifths as much as people of a different skin color is totally about equality.
 

Kwak

Elite Member
Sep 11, 2014
2,417
2,015
118
Country
4
1000202383.png

Since the memo was issued, CBS News reports the Trump administration has signed 456 agreements with local police departments, letting them act as immigration officers — turning traffic stops and routine patrols into immigration raids.


Ryan Shapiro, executive director of Property of the People, put it bluntly: “The documents reveal the Trump administration has authorized every single law enforcement officer in the country, including traffic cops, to engage in immigrant roundups explicitly outside due process.”

 

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,675
6,874
118
Well, they don't want a Poland in the future as well.
It might be less bad than it appears.

A huge number of Poles (>1 million) reside and work abroad in other European nations (same is true of the Baltic states). These tend to be younger, and also have children abroad but will eventually return, which means there will be a signification proportion of Polish children than probably don't show up on Poland's birth rate figures. It's not going to be a huge amount, but could be up to 10%.
 

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,527
977
118
Country
USA
The Lieutenant Governor of Indiana, officially the stupidest place on Earth, states that DEI is worse than the "Three-Fifths Compromise" which he argues "is not a pro-discrimination compromise".


He went on to argue that the Compromise was "designed to make sure that justice was equal for all people and equality really meant equality for all." Because, y'know, deciding that people of a particular skin color were only worth three-fifths as much as people of a different skin color is totally about equality.
Maybe you don't know the history, but he's 100% correct. The abolitionist side of the argument was the one trying to count slaves as less of a person.

In the constitutional convention in 1787, the one where they made the Constitution that actually stuck, they made the rule that representation in Congress would be proportional to the population of the state. They did not, however, tell all the states how their voting would work, with most states using property ownership as the main qualification (explicit limitations about race and sex came later, as owning property de facto accomplished that in the 1700s). The combination of representation by total population and actual voting by only landowners lead to an unfortunate conclusion: landowners in a state could increase their political power by importing more slaves. By 1800, some southern states had populations where nearly half were enslaved, which would give landowners there effectively double the voting power of northerners in states where slavery was either banned or on its way out. The northerners argued that if slaves didn't qualify for the rights of a citizen, they shouldn't be counted towards federal representation, and people shouldn't get political benefits by owning slaves. Counting as three-fifths was the compromise between.

So as much as "racists said blacks were only 3/5ths of a person" makes for a good punchline, the reality is that nobody thought anything like that, they were arguing for counting them as a whole person on one side or none at all on the other, and the side arguing for none at all were actually the abolitionists fighting for equality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phoenixmgs

Hades

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2013
2,557
1,964
118
Country
The Netherlands
Well, being a snake oil salesmen in politics is about as old as politics (or snake oil), so it's not too hard to predict. Community did a similar thing in its poiltics episode, and that was in like 2011.
Honestly Harris should have said ''I hope you all get black mold poisoning'' after the American electorate was dumb and malicious enough to support Trump,
Since the memo was issued, CBS News reports the Trump administration has signed 456 agreements with local police departments, letting them act as immigration officers — turning traffic stops and routine patrols into immigration raids.


Ryan Shapiro, executive director of Property of the People, put it bluntly: “The documents reveal the Trump administration has authorized every single law enforcement officer in the country, including traffic cops, to engage in immigrant roundups explicitly outside due process.”
People should start document ICE activity very intensely so the whole rotten institution can be purged the moment the US has a real government again.
 

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,675
6,874
118
Maybe you don't know the history, but he's 100% correct. The abolitionist side of the argument was the one trying to count slaves as less of a person.

In the constitutional convention in 1787, the one where they made the Constitution that actually stuck, they made the rule that representation in Congress would be proportional to the population of the state. They did not, however, tell all the states how their voting would work, with most states using property ownership as the main qualification (explicit limitations about race and sex came later, as owning property de facto accomplished that in the 1700s). The combination of representation by total population and actual voting by only landowners lead to an unfortunate conclusion: landowners in a state could increase their political power by importing more slaves. By 1800, some southern states had populations where nearly half were enslaved, which would give landowners there effectively double the voting power of northerners in states where slavery was either banned or on its way out. The northerners argued that if slaves didn't qualify for the rights of a citizen, they shouldn't be counted towards federal representation, and people shouldn't get political benefits by owning slaves. Counting as three-fifths was the compromise between.

So as much as "racists said blacks were only 3/5ths of a person" makes for a good punchline, the reality is that nobody thought anything like that, they were arguing for counting them as a whole person on one side or none at all on the other, and the side arguing for none at all were actually the abolitionists fighting for equality.
And once again, someone from the US right twists logic to present equality as racism and racism as equality.
 

XsjadoBlayde

~ just another dread messenger ~
Apr 29, 2020
3,623
3,743
118
don't really understand the ppl who only seem to care when kids are involved, but hey they're still getting involved even when they have metastatic cancer without meditation or medical consultation


Trump Has Now Deported Multiple U.S. Citizen Children With Cancer
Two families — among them three U.S. citizens aged two, four, and seven — were abruptly deported under "troubling circumstances," says the ACLU of Louisiana

April 26, 2025
President Donald Trump talks to reporters after inspecting the North Lawn with members of the White House grounds crew to look for a place to put a 100-foot-tall flag pole on April 23, 2025. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

As part of Donald Trump‘s immigration crackdown, three U.S. citizen children were deported with their mothers by the New Orleans Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Friday morning. One of the children was undergoing cancer treatment and one of the mothers is pregnant.

Both families had lived in the country for years and had ties to their communities, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Louisiana, which warns that the circumstances of their sudden deportations raises grave due process concerns. The civil rights organization says that the first family was detained on Tuesday and the second family on Thursday, and that one of the mothers was given less than one minute on the phone before the call was abruptly dropped, after her spouse attempted to provide a phone number to legal counsel.

Among the children deported with their mothers, says the ACLU, are three U.S. citizens aged two, four, and seven. One of the children is a U.S. citizen child suffering from a rare form of metastatic cancer and was deported out of the country without medication or consultation with their treating physicians — despite ICE being notified in advance of the child’s medical needs. The civil rights organization says that one of the mothers is pregnant, and was deported without ensuring any continuity of prenatal care or proper medical care.

“Once again, the government has used deceptive tactics to deny people their rights. These outrageous actions must be condemned. We as a nation are better than this,” said Alanah Odoms, the Executive Director of the ACLU of Louisiana. “These families deserve better. They must be returned.”

The two-year-old child’s deportation was covered widely Friday evening by media outlets, after the judge in the case demanded a hearing and wrote in a court filing that it appeared the Trump administration had “just deported a U.S. citizen with no meaningful process.”

According to ACLU, both the families were reportedly isolated during key moment when decisions were made over the health, safety, and legal rights of the children involved, as they were not able to consult with legal representatives. ICE’s own written directives mandate coordination for the care of minor children with willing caretakers during detainment.

“A government agency that sequesters and deports vulnerable mothers with their US citizen children without due process must be defunded, not rewarded with an additional 45 billion dollars to continue at taxpayers’ expense,” said Mich P. Gonzalez, founding partner of Sanctuary of the South. “These families were lawfully complying with ICE’s orders and for this they suffered cruel and traumatic separation. If this is what the Trump administration is orchestrating just three months in, we should all be terrified of what the next four years will bring.”

This is at least the second time the Trump administration has deported a child suffering from cancer. Last month, a U.S. citizen and 10-year-old child with brain cancer was deported from Texas to Mexico with her undocumented parents.
clearly these were also domestic abuser gang members too