Funny events in anti-woke world

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,676
6,874
118
Remember Hilary's emails? Cause I don't think anyone will after this.
Oh, they absolutely will remember Hilary's emails, because:

1) The Hilary emails form a stock "but both sides!" excuse for any security problem by the Republicans. Even if the Trump administration were directly texting US military secrets to Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin, the Republicans would defend them doing so with reference to Hilary's emails.

2) The sort of people who are still that hugely bothered by Clinton's emails won't even be reading the news of Hesgeth's indiscretions. The media they access won't tell them, or if they do, the media will bury the problem with a mass "but it's okay really" explanations. Thus those people will continue to believe that the Hilary emails were a particular scandal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,843
5,176
118
Plano, TX
Country
United States
Gender
Male
"I'm not gonna stand here, present some egghead scientific argument based on fact. I'm just a regular dude; I like to drink beer, y'know? I love my family; 'rock, flag, and eagle,' right, Charlie? You see, Charlie? These liberals are trying to assassinate my character. I can't change their mind; I won't change my mind, because I don't have to! Because I'm an American. I won't change my mind on anything, regardless of the facts that are set out before me. I'm dug in, and I'll never change."

Ronald McDonald (aka: "Mac"), It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia, S8:Ep.10, c. 2012
I know The Simpsons is famous for predicting shit well before it comes to fruition, but hats off to IASIP in this case. This was written as satire in 2012, satirizing a ridiculously moronic, ignorant, and stubborn mindset, but sadly, this might as well be the very real and unironic rantings of any MAGA cultist today, 13 years later.
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
17,290
10,036
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
I know The Simpsons is famous for predicting shit well before it comes to fruition, but hats off to IASIP in this case. This was written as satire in 2012, satirizing a ridiculously moronic, ignorant, and stubborn mindset, but sadly, this might as well be the very real and unironic rantings of any MAGA cultist today, 13 years later.
"The world will change to suit me, because I'm armed and ignorant" is a long-standing American mindset.

"It's shameful that they're using their show to attack half of America, when they should be using it to attack the other half of America."
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,445
5,270
118
"I'm not gonna stand here, present some egghead scientific argument based on fact. I'm just a regular dude; I like to drink beer, y'know? I love my family; 'rock, flag, and eagle,' right, Charlie? You see, Charlie? These liberals are trying to assassinate my character. I can't change their mind; I won't change my mind, because I don't have to! Because I'm an American. I won't change my mind on anything, regardless of the facts that are set out before me. I'm dug in, and I'll never change."

Ronald McDonald (aka: "Mac"), It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia, S8:Ep.10, c. 2012
I know The Simpsons is famous for predicting shit well before it comes to fruition, but hats off to IASIP in this case. This was written as satire in 2012, satirizing a ridiculously moronic, ignorant, and stubborn mindset, but sadly, this might as well be the very real and unironic rantings of any MAGA cultist today, 13 years later.
Well, being a snake oil salesmen in politics is about as old as politics (or snake oil), so it's not too hard to predict. Community did a similar thing in its poiltics episode, and that was in like 2011.



What happened with Trump getting elected (again) is as old as dirt, but we all thought people were reasonable enough now to not let it happen again. The early 00's sentiment that bigotry, and racism, and ant-semitism was pretty much over and relegated to only the far fringes of society really did a number on people. And now we're stuck with all the assholes who greedily took advantage of that in the highest positions of power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
17,290
10,036
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
The Lieutenant Governor of Indiana, officially the stupidest place on Earth, states that DEI is worse than the "Three-Fifths Compromise" which he argues "is not a pro-discrimination compromise".


He went on to argue that the Compromise was "designed to make sure that justice was equal for all people and equality really meant equality for all." Because, y'know, deciding that people of a particular skin color were only worth three-fifths as much as people of a different skin color is totally about equality.
 

Kwak

Elite Member
Sep 11, 2014
2,417
2,015
118
Country
4
1000202383.png

Since the memo was issued, CBS News reports the Trump administration has signed 456 agreements with local police departments, letting them act as immigration officers — turning traffic stops and routine patrols into immigration raids.


Ryan Shapiro, executive director of Property of the People, put it bluntly: “The documents reveal the Trump administration has authorized every single law enforcement officer in the country, including traffic cops, to engage in immigrant roundups explicitly outside due process.”

 

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,676
6,874
118
Well, they don't want a Poland in the future as well.
It might be less bad than it appears.

A huge number of Poles (>1 million) reside and work abroad in other European nations (same is true of the Baltic states). These tend to be younger, and also have children abroad but will eventually return, which means there will be a signification proportion of Polish children than probably don't show up on Poland's birth rate figures. It's not going to be a huge amount, but could be up to 10%.
 

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,530
978
118
Country
USA
The Lieutenant Governor of Indiana, officially the stupidest place on Earth, states that DEI is worse than the "Three-Fifths Compromise" which he argues "is not a pro-discrimination compromise".


He went on to argue that the Compromise was "designed to make sure that justice was equal for all people and equality really meant equality for all." Because, y'know, deciding that people of a particular skin color were only worth three-fifths as much as people of a different skin color is totally about equality.
Maybe you don't know the history, but he's 100% correct. The abolitionist side of the argument was the one trying to count slaves as less of a person.

In the constitutional convention in 1787, the one where they made the Constitution that actually stuck, they made the rule that representation in Congress would be proportional to the population of the state. They did not, however, tell all the states how their voting would work, with most states using property ownership as the main qualification (explicit limitations about race and sex came later, as owning property de facto accomplished that in the 1700s). The combination of representation by total population and actual voting by only landowners lead to an unfortunate conclusion: landowners in a state could increase their political power by importing more slaves. By 1800, some southern states had populations where nearly half were enslaved, which would give landowners there effectively double the voting power of northerners in states where slavery was either banned or on its way out. The northerners argued that if slaves didn't qualify for the rights of a citizen, they shouldn't be counted towards federal representation, and people shouldn't get political benefits by owning slaves. Counting as three-fifths was the compromise between.

So as much as "racists said blacks were only 3/5ths of a person" makes for a good punchline, the reality is that nobody thought anything like that, they were arguing for counting them as a whole person on one side or none at all on the other, and the side arguing for none at all were actually the abolitionists fighting for equality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phoenixmgs

Hades

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2013
2,558
1,964
118
Country
The Netherlands
Well, being a snake oil salesmen in politics is about as old as politics (or snake oil), so it's not too hard to predict. Community did a similar thing in its poiltics episode, and that was in like 2011.
Honestly Harris should have said ''I hope you all get black mold poisoning'' after the American electorate was dumb and malicious enough to support Trump,
Since the memo was issued, CBS News reports the Trump administration has signed 456 agreements with local police departments, letting them act as immigration officers — turning traffic stops and routine patrols into immigration raids.


Ryan Shapiro, executive director of Property of the People, put it bluntly: “The documents reveal the Trump administration has authorized every single law enforcement officer in the country, including traffic cops, to engage in immigrant roundups explicitly outside due process.”
People should start document ICE activity very intensely so the whole rotten institution can be purged the moment the US has a real government again.
 

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,676
6,874
118
Maybe you don't know the history, but he's 100% correct. The abolitionist side of the argument was the one trying to count slaves as less of a person.

In the constitutional convention in 1787, the one where they made the Constitution that actually stuck, they made the rule that representation in Congress would be proportional to the population of the state. They did not, however, tell all the states how their voting would work, with most states using property ownership as the main qualification (explicit limitations about race and sex came later, as owning property de facto accomplished that in the 1700s). The combination of representation by total population and actual voting by only landowners lead to an unfortunate conclusion: landowners in a state could increase their political power by importing more slaves. By 1800, some southern states had populations where nearly half were enslaved, which would give landowners there effectively double the voting power of northerners in states where slavery was either banned or on its way out. The northerners argued that if slaves didn't qualify for the rights of a citizen, they shouldn't be counted towards federal representation, and people shouldn't get political benefits by owning slaves. Counting as three-fifths was the compromise between.

So as much as "racists said blacks were only 3/5ths of a person" makes for a good punchline, the reality is that nobody thought anything like that, they were arguing for counting them as a whole person on one side or none at all on the other, and the side arguing for none at all were actually the abolitionists fighting for equality.
And once again, someone from the US right twists logic to present equality as racism and racism as equality.
 

XsjadoBlayde

~ just another dread messenger ~
Apr 29, 2020
3,625
3,746
118
don't really understand the ppl who only seem to care when kids are involved, but hey they're still getting involved even when they have metastatic cancer without meditation or medical consultation


1000013621.jpg


ICE Deports 3 U.S. Citizen Children Held Incommunicado Prior to the Deportation
Families disappeared and isolated without legal access; one child with cancer deported without medication and pregnant mother deported as well

New Orleans, LA - Today, in the early hours of the morning, the New Orleans Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Field Office deported at least two families, including two mothers and their minor children – three of whom are U.S. citizen children aged 2, 4, and 7. One of the mothers is currently pregnant. The families, who had lived in the United States for years and had deep ties to their communities, were deported from the U.S. under deeply troubling circumstances that raise serious due process concerns.

ICE detained the first family on Tuesday, April 22, and the second family on Thursday, April 24. In both cases, ICE held the families incommunicado, refusing or failing to respond to multiple attempts by attorneys and family members to contact them. In one instance, a mother was granted less than one minute on the phone before the call was abruptly terminated when her spouse tried to provide legal counsel’s phone number.

As a result, the families were completely isolated during critical moments when decisions were being made about the welfare of their minor children. This included decisions with serious implications for the health, safety, and legal rights of the children involved–without any opportunity to coordinate with caretakers or consult with legal representatives.

These actions stand in direct violation of ICE’s own written and informal directives, which mandate coordination for the care of minor children with willing caretakers–regardless of immigration status–when deportations are being carried out.

Both families have possible immigration relief, but because ICE denied them access to their attorneys, legal counsel was unable to assist and advise them in time. With one family, government attorneys had assured legal counsel that a legal call would be arranged within 24-48 hours, as well as a call with a family member. Instead, just after close of business and after courts closed for the day, ICE suddenly reversed course and informed counsel that the family would be deported at 6am the next morning–before the court reopened.

That family filed a habeas corpus petition and motion for a temporary restraining order, which was never ruled on because of their rapid early-morning deportation.

In the case of the other family, a U.S. citizen child suffering from a rare form of metastatic cancer was deported without medication or the ability to consult with their treating physicians–despite ICE being notified in advance of the child’s urgent medical needs. In addition, one of the mothers who was deported is pregnant, and ICE proceeded with her deportation without ensuring any continuity of prenatal care or medical oversight.

These actions represent a shocking – although increasingly common–abuse of power. NOLA ICE has inflicted harm and jeopardized the lives and health of vulnerable children and a pregnant woman. The cruelty and deliberate denial of legal and medical access are not only unlawful, but inhumane.
Teresa Reyes-Flores, Southeast Dignity not Detention Coalition (SEDND) - “ICE’s actions show a blatant violation of due process and basic human rights. The families were disappeared, cut off from their lawyers and loved ones, and rushed to be deported, stripping their parents of the chance to protect their U.S. citizen children.”

Gracie Willis, National Immigration Project - ”What we saw from ICE over the last several days is horrifying and baffling. Families have been ripped apart unnecessarily. These mothers had no opportunity to speak with their co-parents to make the kinds of choices that parents are entitled to make for their children, the kinds of decisions that millions of parents make every day: “what is best for our child?” We should be gravely concerned that ICE has been given tacit approval to both detain and deport U.S. citizen children despite the availability and willingness of U.S.-based caregivers who, only because of ICE’s own actions, cannot find or contact them.”

Alanah Odoms, Executive Director of the ACLU of Louisiana - “Once again, the government has used deceptive tactics to deny people their rights. These outrageous actions must be condemned. We as a nation are better than this. These families deserve better. They must be returned.”

Fatima Khan, Louisiana Organization for Refugees and Immigrants (LORI) - “ICE’s actions today go far past the typical inhumanity of their detention operations in Louisiana. They ignored their own protocols on legal access and protecting children’s rights to enact an expedient deportation they know to be unlawful. Not only that, they disappeared these families before any U.S. Court could stand up for its children. We should all be mortified.”

Erin Hebert, Ware Immigration - “Deporting U.S. citizen children is illegal, unconstitutional, and immoral. The speed, brutality, and clandestine manner in which these children were deported is beyond unconscionable, and every official responsible for it should be held accountable.”

Homero López, Jr., Immigration Services and Legal Advocacy (ISLA) - “These deplorable actions demonstrate ICE's increasing willingness to violate all protections for immigrants as well as those of their children. These types of disappearances are reminiscent of the darkest eras in our country's history and put everyone, regardless of immigration status, at risk.”

Mich P. Gonzalez, Sanctuary of the South - “A government agency that sequesters and deports vulnerable mothers with their US citizen children without due process must be defunded, not rewarded with an additional 45 billion dollars to continue at taxpayers’ expense. These families were lawfully complying with ICE’s orders and for this they suffered cruel and traumatic separation. If this is what the Trump administration is orchestrating just three months in, we should all be terrified of what the next four years will bring.”
Trump Has Now Deported Multiple U.S. Citizen Children With Cancer
Two families — among them three U.S. citizens aged two, four, and seven — were abruptly deported under "troubling circumstances," says the ACLU of Louisiana

April 26, 2025
President Donald Trump talks to reporters after inspecting the North Lawn with members of the White House grounds crew to look for a place to put a 100-foot-tall flag pole on April 23, 2025. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

As part of Donald Trump‘s immigration crackdown, three U.S. citizen children were deported with their mothers by the New Orleans Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Friday morning. One of the children was undergoing cancer treatment and one of the mothers is pregnant.

Both families had lived in the country for years and had ties to their communities, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Louisiana, which warns that the circumstances of their sudden deportations raises grave due process concerns. The civil rights organization says that the first family was detained on Tuesday and the second family on Thursday, and that one of the mothers was given less than one minute on the phone before the call was abruptly dropped, after her spouse attempted to provide a phone number to legal counsel.

Among the children deported with their mothers, says the ACLU, are three U.S. citizens aged two, four, and seven. One of the children is a U.S. citizen child suffering from a rare form of metastatic cancer and was deported out of the country without medication or consultation with their treating physicians — despite ICE being notified in advance of the child’s medical needs. The civil rights organization says that one of the mothers is pregnant, and was deported without ensuring any continuity of prenatal care or proper medical care.

“Once again, the government has used deceptive tactics to deny people their rights. These outrageous actions must be condemned. We as a nation are better than this,” said Alanah Odoms, the Executive Director of the ACLU of Louisiana. “These families deserve better. They must be returned.”

The two-year-old child’s deportation was covered widely Friday evening by media outlets, after the judge in the case demanded a hearing and wrote in a court filing that it appeared the Trump administration had “just deported a U.S. citizen with no meaningful process.”

According to ACLU, both the families were reportedly isolated during key moment when decisions were made over the health, safety, and legal rights of the children involved, as they were not able to consult with legal representatives. ICE’s own written directives mandate coordination for the care of minor children with willing caretakers during detainment.

“A government agency that sequesters and deports vulnerable mothers with their US citizen children without due process must be defunded, not rewarded with an additional 45 billion dollars to continue at taxpayers’ expense,” said Mich P. Gonzalez, founding partner of Sanctuary of the South. “These families were lawfully complying with ICE’s orders and for this they suffered cruel and traumatic separation. If this is what the Trump administration is orchestrating just three months in, we should all be terrified of what the next four years will bring.”

This is at least the second time the Trump administration has deported a child suffering from cancer. Last month, a U.S. citizen and 10-year-old child with brain cancer was deported from Texas to Mexico with her undocumented parents.
clearly these were also domestic abuser gang members too

something to with aid for Palestinians if anyone interested, should've added link in previous post with relevant video;
 
Last edited:

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,530
978
118
Country
USA
Then tell me any part of what I said that was inaccurate.

Or is the thing I "just don't get" that accuracy and honesty really just don't matter so long as you feel like you have an opportunity to shame the other side? Nah, I understand that, I also understand that if you're going to make snide comments about simple history lessons being twisted, you come out kind of looking like a lunatic.
 

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
9,271
3,113
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
Then tell me any part of what I said that was inaccurate.

Or is the thing I "just don't get" that accuracy and honesty really just don't matter so long as you feel like you have an opportunity to shame the other side? Nah, I understand that, I also understand that if you're going to make snide comments about simple history lessons being twisted, you come out kind of looking like a lunatic.
We all saw what happened when DEI was removed. Very incompetent white people got jobs they should never have had access to because they are talentless hacks

Trump wasn't worried about DEI being racist. He was worried about POC being more talented than some white people and that was unfair