It doesn't matter. I said it as a throwaway to illustrate just how slapdash you'd been with numbers. But then you challenged it, so I had to explain the basic maths.What does it matter that 4 million is 15 x 230K? I did the math and the number hardly changes when you go from 74 million to 70 million, and you're complaining about that for some reason.
...so just an appeal to incredulity, then. They literally did have 3,600 severe, acute covid cases reported from 63 hospitals. That happened.I'm just saying that even if you took only from the 63 biggest hospitals, you're not going to get to 3,600 cases of severe covid in adolescents.
This entire paragraph is devoid of substance. Its just a recycled list of claims, about things that have already been addressed. You said "immunity doesn't wane for normal people". There is zero substantiation for that.Just stop with the fucking bullshit. [REST SNIPPED]
For goodness sake. Because the benefit against the cost is relatively minimal, so its not seen as necessary.Oh, I thought the 0.0005% was just the chance. If this is as tiny and negligible as you say, why have doctors from countries recommended to not recommend the vaccines/boosters to this group?
Its nonsense of course but Trump being a ''secret informant'' would explain why one of the security agencies directly intervened in 2016 to boost his chances days before the election. Though that was of course the CIA rather than the FBI."Uh, actually guys, he was super-secret undercover the whole time, and we're only claiming this now, because, uh, special reasons."
House Speaker Mike Johnson has revealed that President Donald Trump was once an 'FBI informant' in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's illegal activities.
Johnson made the stunning comments in the halls of Congress on Friday after being pressed by CNN's Manu Raju about Trump routinely calling the Epstein files controversy a Democrat-invented 'hoax'.
'What Trump is referring to is the hoax that the Democrats are using to try to attack him,' Johnson said. 'I’ve talked to him about this many times, many times. He is horrified. It’s been misrepresented. He’s not saying that what Epstein did is a hoax. It’s a terrible, unspeakable evil. He believes that himself.'
'When he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago. He was an FBI informant to try to take this stuff down,' added Johnson, which now raises new questions about Trump's relationship with Epstein.
"I'm gonna make these people stop making fun of me for running away on January 6th!"Here is a Republican in Missouri trying to get rid of free speech on the Internet and make things even more conservative.
Bluesky
bsky.app

The first video, you know Lee Harvey Oswald also went to then Soviet Union Russia only to be disappointed and came back to the US.White south Africans moving to America only to be sorely shocked by having to work shit jobs for shit pay, now beaten by white radicalised American conservatives moving to Russia only to find out it's shit too lmao. wonder what could be the shared problem there, hmmmmmmm....
you could've said any other name, even Sylvester Stallone or Santa Claus, and it'd be passable, but you had to go with that one dude instead lol - he has a lot shady shenanigans surrounding his life that make it hard to take anything he claimed seriously at face value - something an old friend could IlluminateThe first video, you know Lee Harvey Oswald also went to then Soviet Union Russia only to be disappointed and came back to the US.
Robert sits down with Garrison and Margaret to talk about Kerry Thornley, who would go on to help resurrect the Illuminati.
(to be clear, they are in no way pro Illuminati conspiracy theory, but more about the people responsible for pushing the conspiracy theory throughout history, which just so happens so include an old bud of Lee Harvey Oswald)We continue our discussion of Kerry Thornley, friend of Lee Harvey Oswald and resurrector of the Illuminati.
Robert is joined again by Margaret Killjoy and Garrison Davis for part five of our series, in which the story of the Illuminati takes a dark turn.
The Epic story of the Illuminati concludes with some, admittedly, messed up stuff.
Like the ACLU defending the 1st Amendment rights of the KKK. Which is how a lot of the edges of 1A rights regarding protest were drawn.I think they would be inclined to resist any restraint, if for no other reason than it would start a slippery slope and set a precedent that could be expanded.
...and this is why people shouldn't attack loli, even if it's distasteful. The underlying core argument for CSAM being illegal beyond it being gross is that it's creation necessarily victimizes children and it's distribution and...err...let's call it "use" victimizes those children further and it's distribution and sale creates motive for more to be produced causing victimization of further children. Drawings don't have a victim, unless a victim was used as a model for the drawing. But banning drawings of any stripe opens the door for expansion, while the goal should be to keep any limits on expression as narrowly defined and with as firm edges as possible.![]()
Could a new Texas law make some types of anime illegal? Fans worry it’s possible under SB 20
Senate Bill 20 was designed to crack down on AI-generated child pornography in Texas. But now that it’s on the books, some are wondering: Did Texas just open the door to making anime illegal?www.tpr.org
Yet some people don't get this or only start crying when the things they love, get taken away too. Which is why it's so important to fight all this crap, and all the bull, Visa and Mastercard are trying to pull. They're going after things that aren't even porn related and have a massive hate boner for anything that's not conservative nor related to Trump. Hypocritical bitches where among many of them: accusation is a confession. All of the sake for "DA CHILDREN!".But banning drawings of any stripe opens the door for expansion, while the goal should be to keep any limits on expression as narrowly defined and with as firm edges as possible.
Well, that's not the whole or sole argument. There's also an argument that production/consumption of such material acts as a gateway to other more directly harmful actions, or that they normalise such relationships or make them appear harmless....and this is why people shouldn't attack loli, even if it's distasteful. The underlying core argument for CSAM being illegal beyond it being gross is that it's creation necessarily victimizes children and it's distribution and...err...let's call it "use" victimizes those children further and it's distribution and sale creates motive for more to be produced causing victimization of further children. Drawings don't have a victim, unless a victim was used as a model for the drawing.